Getting better
Heres an update, still not finished
FULL VIEW
Heres an update, still not finished
FULL VIEW
http://s492.photobucket.com/albums/rr28 … adow-1.png
all finished for now, until I decide to make a background for it
all finished for now, until I decide to make a background for it
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2008-10-17 08:04:24)
Done, 20 hrs later!
Last edited by dont_be_ss (2008-10-16 17:22:59)
I dont like his legs, too furry imo
_______________________________________________________________________________________________ 
That was the way i wanted them and i like the furry legsMutantsteak wrote:
I dont like his legs, too furry imo
Thanks for comment though
More Apophysis. Just gotta get some AA on there.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
Sweet stuff guys, here's some of mine.
Might post some more later haha
x
Might post some more later haha
x
Awesome work, you're really good!}<enzai wrote:
Sweet stuff guys, here's some of mine.
http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m104 … _/ELS2.jpg
http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m104/_Howie_/015.jpg
http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m104 … 001900.jpg
Might post some more later haha
x
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
You really are a perfectionist, talking about how some of the things aren't good, when they actually look awesome.
I guess it's from seeing thousands of paintings, images and superior art that is indeed flawless that I cannot let my standards go down. One mistake and it's trash. Specially when working in this medium. You only really have one chance to make a flawless painting before it dries. Painting over mistakes dosen't really work because it stands out like crazy. Just drives me nuts. But I'm sure glad people overlook it
Should have used a smooth surface when I was shading in the top to avoid the texture but nvm .
http://img368.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mefshaic3.png
http://img368.imageshack.us/my.php?image=mefshaic3.png
Nice. Hayabusa pl0x
Updated version of my pic, shaded and coloured versions .
http://s492.photobucket.com/albums/rr28 … MEFSha.png
http://s492.photobucket.com/albums/rr28 … nt=me1.png
http://s492.photobucket.com/albums/rr28 … MEFSha.png
http://s492.photobucket.com/albums/rr28 … nt=me1.png
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2008-11-14 09:56:50)
Holy crapz! Noice, wolves ftwdont_be_ss wrote:
Put it full speed
http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?jj4pko12caa0
some good stuff here, keep it up!
my first real colouring effort using only gimp. Pictures were hand drawn first then coloured/burned etc
Is that Solid Snake?
By the way, in general, I've noticed that some people posting here have excellent shading, but very sucky line-art; while others (including myself) find line art easier, yet suck at shading. Perhaps we should make a team, have one half do the lineart and the other do the colouring and shading
By the way, in general, I've noticed that some people posting here have excellent shading, but very sucky line-art; while others (including myself) find line art easier, yet suck at shading. Perhaps we should make a team, have one half do the lineart and the other do the colouring and shading
Based from Snake, bandana version is thoughLai wrote:
Is that Solid Snake?
By the way, in general, I've noticed that some people posting here have excellent shading, but very sucky line-art; while others (including myself) find line art easier, yet suck at shading. Perhaps we should make a team, have one half do the lineart and the other do the colouring and shading
a weird issue occured when i tried to do a background colour, it mixed with colours near the edges and then change patches so it screwed the outline a little unfortunately
That's because you've hand drawn the lineart. Unless you scan at pure black and white (compared to colour or grayscale), even hard lines are never perfectly digitalized. Instead each line get progressively more white towards the edges, creating a large variety of greytones between what you see as the hard black line and the white paper. When you then use this image without processing it first, when you add a background, the various greytones will overlap and give the line edges a distinctive glow. When you do scan in pure black and white, you don't have the greytones but you do have seemingly random black pixels clouded around your lines.M.O.A.B wrote:
a weird issue occured when i tried to do a background colour, it mixed with colours near the edges and then change patches so it screwed the outline a little unfortunately
Pentablet is your best bet. You don't have to use it for your lineart; you can use it to smoothtrack your scanned lineart and use the result for colouring
Some picture i took...
First drawing in a long time:
