http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202 … 00.html.dk
interesting.
caught this today
McCain is getting swiftboated. Irony.
interesting.
caught this today
McCain is getting swiftboated. Irony.
Last edited by God Save the Queen (2008-09-15 19:58:03)
I am sure he is not biased much.Phillip Butler wrote:
After his repatriation in 1973 he earned a Ph.D. in sociology from the University of California at San Diego and became a Navy Organizational Effectiveness consultant. He completed his Navy career in 1981 as a professor of management at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California. He is now a peace and justice activist with Veterans for Peace.
That and 22 years in the Senate. But don't bother with those pesky facts.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
McCain's whole career is based off "I was tortured".
Last edited by Braddock (2008-09-16 05:25:40)
Yeah, he is as bad as those drivers in Iraq that hit an IED.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
What else did MCCain do besides get shot down and tortured? Oh yeah, won his senate seat for 26 years. Because he was shot down and tortured.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Yeah, he is as bad as those drivers in Iraq that hit an IED.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
You are a fucking idiot.
Liberals really hate people that serve with distinction and honor. He should have been a community organizer FTW.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
What else did MCCain do besides get shot down and tortured? Oh yeah, won his senate seat for 26 years. Because he was shot down and tortured.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Yeah, he is as bad as those drivers in Iraq that hit an IED.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
You are a fucking idiot.
If you vote for him based on his campaign so far, you sir are the fucking idiot.
How about he is a republican and a sell out to his country because he won't do anything about illegal immigration, the exporting of US jobs, and the corrupt banking system.m3thod wrote:
...how about he's shit and he's republican and he's old and he's gay and he's dumb and he's not fit for the job?
Yep. Served with distinction and honor. Has no idea how the economy works and needs his VP to change his diaper.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Liberals really hate people that serve with distinction and honor. He should have been a community organizer FTW.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
What else did MCCain do besides get shot down and tortured? Oh yeah, won his senate seat for 26 years. Because he was shot down and tortured.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Yeah, he is as bad as those drivers in Iraq that hit an IED.
You are a fucking idiot.
If you vote for him based on his campaign so far, you sir are the fucking idiot.
Kerry, the man who go others to throw their medals over the wall and wasn't willing to do it himself? The man who personally went after an unarmed civilian boy and gunned him down just to say he got a kill and then returned home to call US soldiers baby killers in congress? John Fucking Kerry the guy who was so obcessed with John Fucking Kennedy that he changed his middle name and went became a swift boater to live the dream. John the swift boat captain that put himself in for purple heart after purple heart for noncombat related toe stubbing injuries?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Yep. Served with distinction and honor. Has no idea how the economy works and needs his VP to change his diaper.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Liberals really hate people that serve with distinction and honor. He should have been a community organizer FTW.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
What else did MCCain do besides get shot down and tortured? Oh yeah, won his senate seat for 26 years. Because he was shot down and tortured.
If you vote for him based on his campaign so far, you sir are the fucking idiot.
Kerry served with distinction and honor. But he didn't get tortured so you know. Fair game.
Last edited by Lotta_Drool (2008-09-16 08:05:55)
Liberals have a sense of humor. And a brain.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Kerry, the man who go others to throw their medals over the wall and wasn't willing to do it himself? The man who personally went after an unarmed civilian boy and gunned him down just to say he got a kill and then returned home to call US soldiers baby killers in congress? John Fucking Kerry the guy who was so obcessed with John Fucking Kennedy that he changed his middle name and went became a swift boater to live the dream. John the swift boat captain that put himself in for purple heart after purple heart for noncombat related toe stubbing injuries?Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
Yep. Served with distinction and honor. Has no idea how the economy works and needs his VP to change his diaper.Lotta_Drool wrote:
Liberals really hate people that serve with distinction and honor. He should have been a community organizer FTW.
Kerry served with distinction and honor. But he didn't get tortured so you know. Fair game.
Liberals say some funny shit. I think I know what kind of an officer Kerry was because I trained and worked with plenty of officers.
Thats pretty ballsy for a fucking ginger kid. Who are you to deem him as a failure? Now whether or not you even have the sack to put yourself in a situation like the one he was in is speculation because I don't know you, but until you actually do it try to refrain. You sit there in your comfort zone and criticize a man who risked his life for someone other than himself. Whether you believe in the cause or not it is irrelevant because it is still admirable. I don't particularly care for the man's politics myself but I wil be fucking damned if I have to sit here and listen to a spoiled little bitch call a man a failure because he gave it his best and was shot down. I have a Purple Heart myself Braddock, am I a failure? Fuck you.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
His service is admirable. Along with 600 other unnamed POW's. Too bad his return wasn't admirable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Thats pretty ballsy for a fucking ginger kid. Who are you to deem him as a failure? Now whether or not you even have the sack to put yourself in a situation like the one he was in is speculation because I don't know you, but until you actually do it try to refrain. You sit there in your comfort zone and criticize a man who risked his life for someone other than himself. Whether you believe in the cause or not it is irrelevant because it is still admirable. I don't particularly care for the man's politics myself but I wil be fucking damned if I have to sit here and listen to a spoiled little bitch call a man a failure because he gave it his best and was shot down. I have a Purple Heart myself Braddock, am I a failure? Fuck you.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
And I am not taking anything away from any of the other POW's. I think anyone whom is captured and subjected to torture has displayed a great level of fortitude and loyalty. But thats just it though, all of them including McCain. My problem is with Braddock so brilliantly announcing that they are failures. Now in fairness to him he only said McCain was but that is only because he doesn't like him. By stating a man who is shot down or over powered in combat is a failure, or has come short of his objection is fucking rude.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
His service is admirable. Along with 600 other unnamed POW's. Too bad his return wasn't admirable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Thats pretty ballsy for a fucking ginger kid. Who are you to deem him as a failure? Now whether or not you even have the sack to put yourself in a situation like the one he was in is speculation because I don't know you, but until you actually do it try to refrain. You sit there in your comfort zone and criticize a man who risked his life for someone other than himself. Whether you believe in the cause or not it is irrelevant because it is still admirable. I don't particularly care for the man's politics myself but I wil be fucking damned if I have to sit here and listen to a spoiled little bitch call a man a failure because he gave it his best and was shot down. I have a Purple Heart myself Braddock, am I a failure? Fuck you.Braddock wrote:
If I were an American I'd prefer a candidate who could make it through a war without getting shot down, captured, tortured or injured... you know, an actual war hero.
Not some guy who couldn't get the job done and subsequently decided to embark on a political career off of the back of his military failures.
"Fuck you bitch, I want the rich chick."
Understood. My problem with McCain isn't his service. It's the free pass the Republicans think he is deemed because he was a tortured POW.deeznutz1245 wrote:
And I am not taking anything away from any of the other POW's. I think anyone whom is captured and subjected to torture has displayed a great level of fortitude and loyalty. But thats just it though, all of them including McCain. My problem is with Braddock so brilliantly announcing that they are failures. Now in fairness to him he only said McCain was but that is only because he doesn't like him. By stating a man who is shot down or over powered in combat is a failure, or has come short of his objection is fucking rude.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
His service is admirable. Along with 600 other unnamed POW's. Too bad his return wasn't admirable.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Thats pretty ballsy for a fucking ginger kid. Who are you to deem him as a failure? Now whether or not you even have the sack to put yourself in a situation like the one he was in is speculation because I don't know you, but until you actually do it try to refrain. You sit there in your comfort zone and criticize a man who risked his life for someone other than himself. Whether you believe in the cause or not it is irrelevant because it is still admirable. I don't particularly care for the man's politics myself but I wil be fucking damned if I have to sit here and listen to a spoiled little bitch call a man a failure because he gave it his best and was shot down. I have a Purple Heart myself Braddock, am I a failure? Fuck you.
"Fuck you bitch, I want the rich chick."