BF2S Forums Sarah Palin is not a muslim

FatherTed wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

you know what, I would just go to your house and take your weapons.  Afterwards I would put you in zip ties and take a gigantic shit in your mouth while your jewish family watched.

burn of the millennium

Nice one, Chief.


Gs while I understand your rage at what Spit was saying, you seem unaware of the The Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act.


Perhaps you out to look into that because as a citizen of the Gawd blessed U>S>A I felt rage at what you said about using AVs on civilians.

FEOS wrote:

I didn't put words in your mouth. Nowhere did I say you called Obama a messiah. I was referring to the generic, doe-eyed followers who refuse to think critically about any of his policies and just say "Change!" like fucking Moonies or something. 

And if you want to talk arrogance, how arrogant is you assuming that just because I disagree with you that I haven't read anything? How's that for fucking arrogance, Spearhead?

Okay then, why even bring it up in a post addressed to me?  You're associating me with someone I dont have a connection with, like I just did to you.  It goes both ways.

FEOS wrote:

But Obama's followers have been saying the experience isn't important...but now it is. That makes them hypocrites. See how that works?

Nope, not at all.  No one has ever said experience isn't important.  That's why picking Biden might look inconsistent to people who don't understand the situation.  TBH its all Hillarys fault.  Now the Repubs are capitalizing on the damage she's done to Obama.  No one ever said experience doesn't matter, it was Hillary Clinton and her people who claimed that experience alone is why Dems should pick her over Obama. 

I think the paragraph above is the most important so... I hope that clears things up.

FEOS wrote:

And you're entitled to your opinion. I'm also entitled to mine. I think that any rational person who reads about both of their experience will see that Obama is no more qualified for the top job than McCain's pick for the #2 job.

Thats perfectly fine, I honestly dont care what you think or who you vote for.  I'm just saying, from my view, it doesnt make sense. 

FEOS wrote:

You don't have the slightest clue what I think. Of course I care who the VP is, but much less than I care about who the President and Cabinet are. It's called understanding the likelihood of the President dying while in office...which is not very. That low likelihood makes the President and his advisory and policy-making body (the Cabinet) far more important.

Well, you were the one who asked the question "Why do you care who McCain picks for VP".  I think its relevant, so, imo at least, picking someone who has similar characteristics of your opponent, and with which you were attacking them for having, is just a tad hypocritical.  Maybe I'm wrong. 

FEOS wrote:

When did I ever call you a sheep? And your implication of the opposite of a card-carrying democrat is offensive, to say the least.

Obviously there was a misunderstanding.  You referred to Obama sheep, even though that has nothing to do with what we're talking about.  Both sides have tons of sheep, so to me its a little pointless to bring it up in a debate. 

I'm sorry if I offended you, I think I've done this before sometime, lol, but I misunderstood your tone I guess.  I was also being just a little sarcastic about the right wing whackjob/card carrying democrat thing.  They're polar opposites and everyone knows there's more than just two categories.

God Save the Queen wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

I'm independant and probably not voting for Obama.  What does that make me GS?

A wasted vote.

to be fair, he's voting in California.  Doesnt really matter who he picks, its a blue state.

Might as well not waste the gas then.

God Save the Queen wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

to be fair, he's voting in California.  Doesnt really matter who he picks, its a blue state.

Might as well not waste the gas then.

its the principle.

I don't quite get the whole vote or die thing. It may seem irresponsible, but what does it matter if you already know the results?

To me not voting is just as much of a statement as voting. I don't vote because I already know the results, not because I don't care.

God Save the Queen wrote:

Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:

God Save the Queen wrote:

its the principle.

I don't quite get the whole vote or die thing. It may seem irresponsible, but what does it matter if you already know the results?

To me not voting is just as much of a statement as voting. I don't vote because I already know the results, not because I don't care.

what state is minnesota going for, do you think?

Obama. Pretty close, but Obama. Had he chosen Pawlenty it would have most likely been McCain.

May lightning stike me down if I'm wrong.

Unlike most people in here, I'm ok with either canidate winning and will not be moving to Canada.

Uzique wrote:

America seems to demand a soap opera

That coming from a guy in the UK.

How're the royals doing?

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2008-09-02 18:13:45)

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

Uzique wrote:

America seems to demand a soap opera

That coming from a guy in the UK.

How're the royals doing?

I heard harry or whatever his name wore a swatstika at a party

Probably because our elections mean just a bit more than yours...

Uzique wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Probably because our elections mean just a bit more than yours...

A democratic process is equally important to every member of every society, I could argue.

You have a bigger influence on the world stage but that doesn't mean our mentality is "Fuck it, we won't vote for our Prime Minister because our country doesn't happen to have the largest number of nukes or the biggest military spending budget". People in dictatorial third-world countries don't stop urging for democracy due to a sudden overwhelming sense of inferiority .

Your statement is undeniably true... but doesn't it worry you even more then when the vast majority of your electorate and voting population wants to bitch and gossip over the VP's pregnant daughter? Or the religion written on Obama's official documents? It's irrelevant and has nothing to do with how they'll run your colossal superpower of a country!

Less than half our populace votes, if the news agencies pandered to the majority they wouldn't be looking at the people who vote. Honestly you're making a bigger deal about this than any voting American has on these forums.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Probably because our elections mean just a bit more than yours...

A democratic process is equally important to every member of every society, I could argue.

You have a bigger influence on the world stage but that doesn't mean our mentality is "Fuck it, we won't vote for our Prime Minister because our country doesn't happen to have the largest number of nukes or the biggest military spending budget". People in dictatorial third-world countries don't stop urging for democracy due to a sudden overwhelming sense of inferiority .

Your statement is undeniably true... but doesn't it worry you even more then when the vast majority of your electorate and voting population wants to bitch and gossip over the VP's pregnant daughter? Or the religion written on Obama's official documents? It's irrelevant and has nothing to do with how they'll run your colossal superpower of a country!

Less than half our populace votes, if the news agencies pandered to the majority they wouldn't be looking at the people who vote. Honestly you're making a bigger deal about this than any voting American has on these forums.

Because it worries me that the actively-voting and intelligent members of this Forum want to debate such topics more often than a candidate's fiscal policy or their foreign policy Of course these threads have been discussed and not altogether overlooked but in contrast it's quite surprising to see 10-threads in a day spring up about the Palin-pregnancy, with one reaching 20 pages!

And yes God the jeering and laughing in Parliament is pretty good. All 12 people that tune into those live casts probably get a good chuckle out of it. But for the most part (and I myself have sat in on Parliamentary debates in the public galleries of the Houses of Parliament and the Welsh Assembly) it's all boring dross.

God Save the Queen wrote:

now Ive seen plenty video of your parliament and a lot of what they do is insult, jeer and laugh.  not that thats a very bad thing, makes it entertaining to watch.

House of commons?

It's a right laugh.