Eizo or Samsung monitor

2008-08-26 17:12:58

#1

tupla_s: .; +455|6626|Finland

I can't decide which one to get, and don't know much about monitors. So maybe you techy guys can help me deside.

EIZO FlexScan S2201WSE
* 1680 × 1050 native resolution
* 1000:1 contrast ratio
* 300 cd/m2 brightness
* 178° viewing angles
* Digital/analog inputs
* Built in Speakers
* BrightRegulator
* EzUp stand with 90° Pivot
289€
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Samsung 2253bw
* Screen Size 22" Widescreen
* Resolution 1680 x 1050
* Brightness 300cd/m²
* Contrast Ratio DC 8000:1 (1000:1)
* Response time 2ms
* Viewing Angle (Horizontal/Vertical) 170˚/160˚
* Colour supported 16.7M
310€

2008-08-26 17:14:58

#2

tobz102: Member; +11|5973|UK

my mate's got the samsung and its the sex

2008-08-26 17:16:01

#3

Brasso: member; +1,549|6665

as a general rule, Samsung for LCDs. i havent even heard of eizo.

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-08-26 17:16:43

#4

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6473|King Of The Islands

BW is now the LW btw. Only difference is the advertised size (22" vs. 21.6"). GET.

And who or what is Eizo?

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2008-08-26 17:19:15

#5

tobz102: Member; +11|5973|UK

Cheez wrote:
BW is now the LW btw. Only difference is the advertised size (22" vs. 21.6"). GET.

And who or what is Eizo?

Eizo?? i think i've got a cream for it

2008-08-26 17:24:37

#6

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6488|The Twilight Zone

Voted Samsung. I don't like built in speakers.

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-08-26 17:36:04

#7

Gooners: Wiki Contributor; +2,700|6666

Samsung.I Have the same model. I Love it. Buy It. Do Not Think.

2008-08-26 17:39:36

#8

Mutantbear: Semi Constructive Criticism; +1,431|5999|London, England

haffeysucks wrote:
as a general rule, Samsung for LCDs. i havent even heard of eizo.

Don't you ahve an EIZO tv?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

2008-08-26 17:40:29

#9

Brasso: member; +1,549|6665

Mutantsteak wrote:
haffeysucks wrote:
as a general rule, Samsung for LCDs. i havent even heard of eizo.
Don't you ahve an EIZO tv?

Vizio, where are you

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-08-26 18:40:56

#10

coke: Aye up duck!; +440|6743|England. Stoke

haffeysucks wrote:
as a general rule, Samsung for LCDs. i havent even heard of eizo.

2008-08-26 18:42:14

#11

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6473|King Of The Islands

This seems prutty unanimous.

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2008-08-26 19:15:40

#12

ceslayer23: IN YOUR MIRROR; +142|6395|CLOSER THAN I APPEAR

tupla_s wrote:
I can't decide which one to get, and don't know much about monitors. So maybe you techy guys can help me deside.

EIZO FlexScan S2201WSE
* 1680 × 1050 native resolution
* 1000:1 contrast ratio
* 300 cd/m2 brightness
* 178° viewing angles
* Digital/analog inputs
* Built in Speakers
* BrightRegulator
* EzUp stand with 90° Pivot
289€
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Samsung 2253bw
* Screen Size 22" Widescreen
* Resolution 1680 x 1050
* Brightness 300cd/m²
* Contrast Ratio DC 8000:1 (1000:1)
* Response time 2ms
* Viewing Angle (Horizontal/Vertical) 170˚/160˚
* Colour supported 16.7M
310€

i like the color of your wordz

2008-08-27 00:46:34

#13

Mint Sauce: Frighteningly average; +780|6320|eng

Go with the Eizo.

#rekt

2008-08-27 11:55:27

#14

Snorkelfarsan: Soup Boy; +32|6641|Stockholm, Sweden

Eizo are pretty good, but not as famous as Samsung. Google after some reviews and get filled in, then decide. Also, after all the bullshit with different panel qualities for the Samsung 226BW, I kind of lost my will to buy a Samsung monitor.

2008-08-27 12:04:13

#15

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|6806|PNW

Samsung. If you want to consider the Eizo, go look up some reviews on Google, if you can find any.

2008-08-27 12:20:36

#16

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|6877|Reykjavík, Iceland.

TBH, for flat screens

Samsung > Dell > Anything else.

2008-08-27 12:26:46

#17

wah1188: You orrible caaaaaaan't; +321|6494|UK

I'd say Samsung that extra 21 Euros goes a long way.

2008-08-27 12:36:11

#18

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6527|N. Ireland

Eizo are über, but I only have experience with their older line (ie when 15" 1024x768 was today's 24")

Last edited by kylef (2008-08-27 12:37:47)

2008-08-27 12:56:38

#19

Nessie09: I "fix" things; +107|6704|The Netherlands

Eizo, for the Pivot function. I have a HP monitor and love that function

2008-08-27 13:12:19

#20

Defiance: Member; +438|6705

Nessie09 wrote:
Eizo, for the Pivot function. I have a HP monitor and love that function

So go ahead and ignore the actual monitor then.

2008-08-27 15:13:55

#21

tupla_s: .; +455|6626|Finland

unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Samsung. If you want to consider the Eizo, go look up some reviews on Google, if you can find any.

I've read about the EIZO on a Finnish forum and they had only good things to say about it. Can't find any actual reviews but it won a test/comparison in MicroPC magazine, I just can't find the article anywhere so I could read it. Here's the list of monitors they tested and the EIZO got the best score.

Dell Ultrasharp 2208WFP
Eizo Flexscan S2201WSE
NEC Multisync LCD225WXM
Samsung Syncmaster 2243WM
Viewsonic VX2255wmb
Dell Ultrasharp 3008WFP
Eizo Flexscan SX3031W-H
NEC Multisync LCD3090WQXi
Samsung Syncmaster 305T

wah1188 wrote:
I'd say Samsung that extra 21 Euros goes a long way.

Actually I could get the Samsung for 275€ from other site, but I've heard some bad experiences from their delivery and warranty. And the site I was going to order has pixel warranty, so if there's even 1 dead pixel when I get it or if one dies during the warranty period (*) I can get it replaced.

* Samsung warranty 3years; EIZO warranty 5 years

Nessie09 wrote:
Eizo, for the Pivot function. I have a HP monitor and love that function

Yeah that pivot would be nice to have, but it isn't that important to me

Last edited by tupla_s (2008-08-27 15:27:36)

2008-08-27 15:20:39

#22

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6488|The Twilight Zone

Samsung 2253bw still rapes it in games.

2008-08-27 16:34:27

#23

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6473|King Of The Islands

Uh, Samsung cover the warranty, not the shop.

And the Samsung does indeed have 3 years zero-dead-pixel. Shows you how much faith they have in their panel if they one-for-one swap the bastard after three years.

Unless Finland's whack.

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

2008-08-27 16:41:50

#24

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6488|The Twilight Zone

Cheez wrote:
And the Samsung does indeed have 3 years zero-dead-pixel.

They do?

2008-08-27 17:13:43

#25

Cheez: Herman is a warmaphrodite; +1,027|6473|King Of The Islands

Well they cover dead pixel for the entire warranty, and the warranty is 3 years.

samsung.com/au/ wrote:
3 Years
LCD Televisions
TFT LCD display
Business print solution
Monitors
Hard disc drive

samsung.com/au/ wrote:
19/21/24" LCD monitors:

Outside the 14 days of purchase if you have 1 or more dead pixels anywhere on the screen we will replace it for you under warranty.

(within 14 days, the shop has to swap it).

I looked into it when I bought the bastard myself.

My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.

Eizo	5%	5% - 2
Samsung	94%	94% - 37
Other (specify)	0%	0% - 0
Total: 39

BF2S Forums Eizo or Samsung monitor

Poll

Cheez wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

Mutantsteak wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

haffeysucks wrote:

tupla_s wrote:

Nessie09 wrote:

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

wah1188 wrote:

Nessie09 wrote:

Cheez wrote:

samsung.com/au/ wrote:

samsung.com/au/ wrote:

Board footer