Another .ahk to draw square on center of screen?

2008-08-18 12:46:49

#26

alexb: <3; +590|5950|Kentucky, USA

http://www.pbbans.com/mbi-viewban-4271adea-vb83969.html

See?

Also, default usersettings -

Code:

rem 
rem Settingsfile automatically saved by bf2
rem 
SettingsManager.boolSet GSClPunkBuster 1 
SettingsManager.floatSet GSDefaultLatencyCompensation 0.100000 
SettingsManager.boolSet GSExtrapolateFrame 0 
SettingsManager.U32Set GSExtrapolationTime 1200 
SettingsManager.U32Set GSInterpolationTime 100 
SettingsManager.U32Set GSPerfLogAtPlayerCount 30 
SettingsManager.stringSet GSPlayerName "=BB= alexbay13"
SettingsManager.boolSet GSShowNetGraph 0 
SettingsManager.boolSet GSUseObjectCache 1

SettingsManager.stringSet GSPlayerName "=BB= alexbay13" - "Enter your name here"

2008-08-18 12:54:36

#27

Zoeff: Member; +5|5812|The Netherlands

nice, so it's classified as a hack. Lovely.

Oh and thanks for those default values!

2008-08-18 16:22:22

#28

Adamshannon8: Member; +94|6195

Freezer7Pro wrote:
The usersettings.con bannination is because it can be exploited to show enemy nametags.

and you know this how?

2008-08-18 16:42:45

#29

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|6854|Reykjavík, Iceland.

Adamshannon8 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
The usersettings.con bannination is because it can be exploited to show enemy nametags.
and you know this how?

it's freezer, he has tried every single glitch, hack and exploit there is. (not to use them online though, just because he can)

2008-08-18 17:31:49

#30

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6208|Winland

Adamshannon8 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
The usersettings.con bannination is because it can be exploited to show enemy nametags.
and you know this how?

Because I used it until it got caught Was hella practical, not to mention fun. Troll harder, please. If something similar pops up I'll use it fo'sho. By the time, that was perfectly legit.

Also Sydney, I've tried every glitch and exploit, never a "real hack"

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-19 03:11:53

#31

GateKeeper{NL}: Member; +142|6380

its on clanbase though; someone admitted "tweakhacking?"

2008-08-19 03:15:27

#32

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6464|The Twilight Zone

Mint Sauce wrote:
Zoeff wrote:
From the Sights Sticky thread:

Jemme101 wrote:
Most Snipers in this game probably know that the center of screen doesnt match the center of the reticle of your scope. The center of the screen is what the game-engine uses for reference in determining if you are on target.
However the information on the discrepancy between center of screen and reticle was only taken from testing in a 1024 x 768 format. Recent testing done by ScoutStrike showed an entirely different story for 1280 x 1024. Check the pictures below for the differences ...

http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 6_1024.jpg http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 6_1280.jpg

http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 4_1024.jpg http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 4_1280.jpg

http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 5_1024.jpg http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 5_1280.jpg

http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … D_1024.jpg http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … D_1280.jpg

http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 8_1024.jpg http://www.xs4all.nl/~thoorens/bf2/Reti … 8_1280.jpg

The reason for choosing a square to depict the center of the screen is the following;
The coordinate system runs from x = 0-1023 and y = 0-767 (which gives 1024x768 pixels)
The center is actually located at x = 1023/2 = 511.5 and y = 767/2 = 383.5, but since there is no pixel at that exact coordinate, the best approximation would be to draw a square around x = 511-512 and y = 383-384. The hit point is the middle of the square.
The same goes for the 1280 x 1024 pictures.
Because of this, wouldn't it be easier to write another .ahk that draws a 2x2 (So a total of 4 pixels) square in the center of your screen or is that impossible?
I've thought of literally drawing a dot with some CD-Pen but having to look at it ALL THE TIME would probably get annoying after a while.

On a related note, it looks like PunkBuster has started kicking people for having a modified Usersettings.con file. God save us all...........
I know, even the WAIB server is doing it..

So far I noticed WAIB and NMK kicking for tweaks.

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-08-19 05:52:57

#33

~FuzZz~: .yag era uoy fi siht deaR; +422|6333|Orrstrayleea

OK, OBVIOUSLY, Im missing something.....

Why are people drawing squares in the center of their screens?
Why is PB banning people for mod'd usercons?
Whats with all the pics in OP?
They all look the same?

2008-08-19 06:06:57

#34

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6208|Winland

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:
OK, OBVIOUSLY, Im missing something.....

Why are people drawing squares in the center of their screens?

The crosshairs in BF2 are slightly off at other resolutions than 1024x768, so people think it matters.

Why is PB banning people for mod'd usercons?

'cause it can let you see enemy nametags.

Whats with all the pics in OP?
They all look the same?

The dot is slightly moved from the dead center in the 1280 pics

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-08-19 07:57:55

#35

HaawwK: Member; +31|5996|Bolton

Sydney wrote:
Adamshannon8 wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
The usersettings.con bannination is because it can be exploited to show enemy nametags.
and you know this how?
it's freezer, he has tried every single glitch, hack and exploit there is. (not to use them online though, just because he can)

it wasnt usersettings.con that you could put those commands in, it was profile.con

profile.con is like an autoexec, you can put your soundtweaks and usersettings tweaks into the profile.con and make the file read only, then you wont get kicked.... have fun

2008-08-19 08:09:44

#36

FatherTed: xD; +3,936|6511|so randum

I wish i was cool enough to give a shit about this bollocks.

Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

2008-08-20 08:04:57

#37

HaawwK: Member; +31|5996|Bolton

Aapje wrote:
HaawwK wrote:
Sydney wrote:

it's freezer, he has tried every single glitch, hack and exploit there is. (not to use them online though, just because he can)
it wasnt usersettings.con that you could put those commands in, it was profile.con

profile.con is like an autoexec, you can put your soundtweaks and usersettings tweaks into the profile.con and make the file read only, then you wont get kicked.... have fun
I thought they fixed that a long time ago? Way back I tried it out (nametags in profile.con) and I got kicked for it. But that was a long time ago though..

the nametag tweak is fixed yea

BF2S Forums Another .ahk to draw square on center of screen?

Code:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Adamshannon8 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Adamshannon8 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Mint Sauce wrote:

Zoeff wrote:

Jemme101 wrote:

Pea....Tear.....Griffen wrote:

Sydney wrote:

Adamshannon8 wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

Aapje wrote:

HaawwK wrote:

Sydney wrote:

Board footer