Cuil- Best Search Engine Evar.

2008-07-28 08:28:25

#1

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6739

Anyone heard of / using this? It really deserves some recognition to be honest- the best (new) search engine around in my opinion.

It's made by former Google staff, and pretty much does all the basics of a search-engine, only in a slicker and more 'intelligent' way. Some of the features are really cool, and unlike a lot of other new 'concept' sites and search engines- I actually find them useful and good to use. It's recently been featured on BBC News as a possible 'rival' to Google - the next big thing so to speak - although I think it'll probably experience the same problem as every other good new website: lack of awareness and advertising over the current giants.

Check it out anyway, I myself intend to substitute all my usual Google searches for Cuil searches .

http://www.cuil.com/

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-07-28 08:30:25

#2

S.Lythberg: Mastermind; +429|6715|Chicago, IL

I searched my last name and I didn't come up

2008-07-28 08:32:02

#3

Sydney: 2λчиэλ; +783|7112|Reykjavík, Iceland.

I searched a bunch of porn stars and nothing came up

2008-07-28 08:37:27

#4

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6959|Devon, England

How do you pronounce that?

"Kyoo-ill"?

2008-07-28 08:41:49

#5

{uscm}Jyden: You likey leaky?; +433|6947|In You Endo- Stoke

FFLink13 wrote:
How do you pronounce that?

"Kyoo-ill"?

Cool...

Its on the bbc today...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/7528503.stm

2008-07-28 08:42:25

#6

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6959|Devon, England

It's also painfully slow for me.

2008-07-28 08:46:10

#7

chittydog: less busy; +586|7104|Kubra, Damn it!

FFLink13 wrote:
It's also painfully slow for me.

2008-07-28 08:47:18

#8

henno13: A generally unremarkable member; +230|6617|Belfast

chittydog wrote:
FFLink13 wrote:
It's also painfully slow for me.

https://img217.imageshack.us/img217/7903/outrage4yvdj3bf67oqxx5.jpg

2008-07-28 08:57:51

#9

Ender2309: has joined the GOP; +470|6839|USA

i don't know why, but the way that word is spelled really makes me angry.

2008-07-28 09:33:27

#10

_j5689_: Dreads & Bergers; +364|6985|Riva, MD

I found my distant cousin's page related to her singing career and I found my uncle's prior work information related to his company: The Red Buffalo

As well as my XFire page of course. All that from my last name.

http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Tilert

2008-07-28 09:40:45

#11

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6466|Winland

5 out of 9 hits on the first page when searching for me are me, so I'm happy

http://www.cuil.com/search?q=Freezer7Pro

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-07-28 09:44:55

#12

Brasso: member; +1,549|6899

It couldn't find anything with my first and last name, and it's slow. I prefer Google.

"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"

2008-07-28 09:45:48

#13

The#1Spot: Member; +105|6808|byah

Why should I use it when google has never let me down as of yet.

2008-07-28 09:46:10

#14

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6975|67.222.138.85

Guil wrote:
We didn’t find any results for “no u”

2008-07-28 10:09:27

#15

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6739

The#1Spot wrote:
Why should I use it when google has never let me down as of yet.

There are a few cool features that Google doesn't have, and when the server's aren't being spammed with traffic brought in from the BBC coverage, the entire search engine feels more 'fluid' and fast. The problem that the search engine will encounter has already been demonstrated here... of course it won't have the range of features, speed or sheer number of search results as Google. People have to be reasonable and not always compare a new engine with the paragon of search engines. Google has been archiving and indexing for years. But all of Google's employees are the brightest in the business- and the most inventive- so I'm sure this will have a good future .

It's only a search engine, I know! Google doesn't let us down... can't argue with that point, but I'm all for variation and competition. Microsoft/Google owning and running everything on the Internet isn't the brightest of E-Futures .

Last edited by Uzique (2008-07-28 10:10:21)

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2008-07-28 10:47:53

#16

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6869|132 and Bush

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id … _article=1

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-07-28 10:50:57

#17

aimless: Member; +166|6393|Texas

Searched "Battlefield 2", haven't found the actual EA site yet....found it, page 5.

2008-07-28 10:59:07

#18

firebolt5: Member; +114|6424

Sydney wrote:
I searched a bunch of porn stars and nothing came up

Safe search off?

2008-07-28 11:18:42

#19

SamTheMan:D: Banned; +856|6243|England

google ftw

2008-07-28 12:15:26

#20

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6869|132 and Bush

Owneded.

We’ll be back soon...

Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity.

Thanks for your patience.

.. and what's up with the trend of emphasizing "i" in everything now? (iGoogle included).

Gawd that's getting gay.

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2008-07-28 13:08:09

#21

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6975|67.222.138.85

Kmarion wrote:
Owneded.

We’ll be back soon...

Due to overwhelming interest, our Cuil servers are running a bit hot right now. The search engine is momentarily unavailable as we add more capacity.

Thanks for your patience.
.. and what's up with the trend of emphasizing "i" in everything now? (iGoogle included).
http://i34.tinypic.com/24n1oj6.png

Gawd that's getting gay.

It makes the l look like a lighter shade of gray compared to the c and u in this case as well, making that logo look like shit.

2008-07-28 13:20:31