Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6443|The Land of Scott Walker
https://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/image/2008/W21/5232008191624.jpg

CTS-V posted a lap time of 7:59.32 around Germany's famous Nordschleife

http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp … le_id=6847

i g
Banned
+876|5862|GA

fucking nice. looks soooo badddd (that's a good thing)
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6535|Long Island, New York
Meh

S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6443|The Land of Scott Walker

i g wrote:

fucking nice. looks soooo badddd (that's a good thing)
Sure does.  I'll take one in black please.
i g
Banned
+876|5862|GA

Stingray24 wrote:

i g wrote:

fucking nice. looks soooo badddd (that's a good thing)
Sure does.  I'll take one in black please.
oh yes
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6443|The Land of Scott Walker

Poseidon wrote:

Meh

S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance. 

https://image.motortrend.com/f/features/auto_news/2008/9843420/112_0805_02z+2009_cadillac_CTS-V+nurburgring.jpg
https://www.dragtimes.com/images/10686-2007-Mercedes-Benz-S550.jpg
The#1Spot
Member
+105|6537|byah
Not really hard to get when the cars within 10sec have a 100+hp handicap. I was looking at all the cars that ran and I found that a BMW X5 beats the Cadillac by 9 sec. Yea a SUV.
Nappy
Apprentice
+151|6227|NSW, Australia

lol
and SUV is such a gay word
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6535|Long Island, New York

Stingray24 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Meh

S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance. 

http://image.motortrend.com/f/features/ … rgring.jpg
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/10686-2 … z-S550.jpg
"Agressive stance"? lol

I'm talking in terms of general looks. My dad owns an S550 and in person...it's freaking beautiful. Maybe in terms of speed the CTS-V wins, but in everything else, the S550 excels in.
chaosdragon001
Whee
+53|6506|Los Angeles, California
Always been a fan of the S550, but the CTS-V just looks plain awesome. I mean c'mon, a CTS with a Vette engine?
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6647

That's a decent time. The Nordschleife produces some funny times sometimes though. For instance, a BMW X5 has posted a 4 second faster time than an AMG spec CLK. And it's an SUV.
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6498|so randum
S550 lol hands down.

Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.


And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6535|Long Island, New York

FatherTed wrote:

S550 lol hands down.

Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.


And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focus
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6498|so randum

Poseidon wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

S550 lol hands down.

Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.


And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focus
American cars are definitely getting better nowadays in terms of performance (see ZO6), but in terms of quality (par for par with counterpart euro version) they're miles behind.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6730|St. Andrews / Oslo

It's fucking ugly.


S-class > that..... thing.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
Poseidon
Fudgepack DeQueef
+3,253|6535|Long Island, New York

FatherTed wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

S550 lol hands down.

Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.


And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focus
American cars are definitely getting better nowadays in terms of performance (see ZO6), but in terms of quality (par for par with counterpart euro version) they're miles behind.
There's plenty of American cars which are nice luxury-wise...but yes, European/Asian cars excel in that.

Seriously, I love my dad's S550...he's got some Mercedes fetish (we had an S500 from like 2001-2004 and he now has an ML550 that my stepmom drives) and I don't mind it at all.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6341|tropical regions of london
my next car purchase
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6443|The Land of Scott Walker

The#1Spot wrote:

Not really hard to get when the cars within 10sec have a 100+hp handicap. I was looking at all the cars that ran and I found that a BMW X5 beats the Cadillac by 9 sec. Yea a SUV.
Yeah, with an engine from a V12 LMR producing 750 hp ...
_j5689_
Dreads & Bergers
+364|6715|Riva, MD

Poseidon wrote:

Stingray24 wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Meh

S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance. 

http://image.motortrend.com/f/features/ … rgring.jpg
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/10686-2 … z-S550.jpg
"Agressive stance"? lol

I'm talking in terms of general looks. My dad owns an S550 and in person...it's freaking beautiful. Maybe in terms of speed the CTS-V wins, but in everything else, the S550 excels in.
It excels at being ugly like most other Mercedes do.  I prefer BMWs myself tbh.
Mint Sauce
Frighteningly average
+780|6284|eng
Lol just because it got a good 'Ring time doesn't mean it's that great, on the road it will get raped by much less expensive metal, and it's own kind, Audi RS4, M3, C63, IS-F, R26R, Evo X; I could go on and on.

Americans don't know how to make a decent handling car, especially Cadillac.
#rekt
i g
Banned
+876|5862|GA

Mint Sauce wrote:

Lol just because it got a good 'Ring time doesn't mean it's that great, on the road it will get raped by much less expensive metal, and it's own kind, Audi RS4, M3, C63, IS-F, R26R, Evo X; I could go on and on.

Americans don't know how to make a decent handling car, especially Cadillac.
it's always europe vs us. stfu with that bulllshit kid

i actually read your post. do you even have a clue as to what you're talking about? do you even know what nurburgring is? obviously not...

Last edited by i g (2008-07-24 13:21:48)

Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6443|The Land of Scott Walker

Mint Sauce wrote:

Lol just because it got a good 'Ring time doesn't mean it's that great, on the road it will get raped by much less expensive metal, and it's own kind, Audi RS4, M3, C63, IS-F, R26R, Evo X; I could go on and on.

Americans don't know how to make a decent handling car, especially Cadillac.
This isn't your father's Cadillac ... this one can do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and the quarter mile in 12 seconds flat.  A car that doesn't handle well couldn't lap the 'Ring with a time like the CTS-V set.  The cars you listed are great cars, give the CTS-V the props it's due, too.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6341|tropical regions of london
what a machine
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6598|132 and Bush

https://i33.tinypic.com/33dfif6.jpg
vroom
Xbone Stormsurgezz
stryyker
bad touch
+1,682|6718|California

Jeez, I want to drive to the store, not orbit the fucking moon...

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard