CTS-V posted a lap time of 7:59.32 around Germany's famous Nordschleife
http://www.roadandtrack.com/article.asp … le_id=6847
Sure does. I'll take one in black please.i g wrote:
fucking nice. looks soooo badddd (that's a good thing)
oh yesStingray24 wrote:
Sure does. I'll take one in black please.i g wrote:
fucking nice. looks soooo badddd (that's a good thing)
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance.Poseidon wrote:
Meh
S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
"Agressive stance"? lolStingray24 wrote:
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance.Poseidon wrote:
Meh
S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
http://image.motortrend.com/f/features/ … rgring.jpg
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/10686-2 … z-S550.jpg
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focusFatherTed wrote:
S550 lol hands down.
Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.
And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
American cars are definitely getting better nowadays in terms of performance (see ZO6), but in terms of quality (par for par with counterpart euro version) they're miles behind.Poseidon wrote:
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focusFatherTed wrote:
S550 lol hands down.
Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.
And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
There's plenty of American cars which are nice luxury-wise...but yes, European/Asian cars excel in that.FatherTed wrote:
American cars are definitely getting better nowadays in terms of performance (see ZO6), but in terms of quality (par for par with counterpart euro version) they're miles behind.Poseidon wrote:
Especially when one car has massage rollers in it as well as seats that hug your sides as you turn so your weight doesn't shift focusFatherTed wrote:
S550 lol hands down.
Cars like this aren't for speed - they're for comfort.
And i know which car i'd rather be driving around in.
Yeah, with an engine from a V12 LMR producing 750 hp ...The#1Spot wrote:
Not really hard to get when the cars within 10sec have a 100+hp handicap. I was looking at all the cars that ran and I found that a BMW X5 beats the Cadillac by 9 sec. Yea a SUV.
It excels at being ugly like most other Mercedes do. I prefer BMWs myself tbh.Poseidon wrote:
"Agressive stance"? lolStingray24 wrote:
Only 382 hp for the S550 and the CTS-V has a more aggressive stance.Poseidon wrote:
Meh
S550 = best sedan for under 100k tbh
http://image.motortrend.com/f/features/ … rgring.jpg
http://www.dragtimes.com/images/10686-2 … z-S550.jpg
I'm talking in terms of general looks. My dad owns an S550 and in person...it's freaking beautiful. Maybe in terms of speed the CTS-V wins, but in everything else, the S550 excels in.
it's always europe vs us. stfu with that bulllshit kidMint Sauce wrote:
Lol just because it got a good 'Ring time doesn't mean it's that great, on the road it will get raped by much less expensive metal, and it's own kind, Audi RS4, M3, C63, IS-F, R26R, Evo X; I could go on and on.
Americans don't know how to make a decent handling car, especially Cadillac.
Last edited by i g (2008-07-24 13:21:48)
This isn't your father's Cadillac ... this one can do 0-60 in 3.5 seconds and the quarter mile in 12 seconds flat. A car that doesn't handle well couldn't lap the 'Ring with a time like the CTS-V set. The cars you listed are great cars, give the CTS-V the props it's due, too.Mint Sauce wrote:
Lol just because it got a good 'Ring time doesn't mean it's that great, on the road it will get raped by much less expensive metal, and it's own kind, Audi RS4, M3, C63, IS-F, R26R, Evo X; I could go on and on.
Americans don't know how to make a decent handling car, especially Cadillac.
Jeez, I want to drive to the store, not orbit the fucking moon...