Britain Pwned By Islam

2008-07-03 20:31:42

#1

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6920|Global Command

Q: what are you thinking?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article … judge.html

Lord Chief Justice Lord Phillips said that Islamic legal principles could be employed to deal with family and marital arguments and to regulate finance.

He declared: 'Those entering into a contractual agreement can agree that the agreement shall be governed by a law other than English law.'

I think some of that wig material worked it's way into his brain.

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2008/07/03/article-0-01D69EEE00000578-749_233x381.jpg

2008-07-03 20:40:31

#2

deeznutz1245: Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.; +483|6884|Connecticut

My question is this: if it is a contractual agrement other than British law, how would either party expect it to be governed by British law when one or both parties faults?

Malloy must go

2008-07-03 20:59:45

#3

Stingray24: Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy; +1,060|6836|The Land of Scott Walker

My question is the same as deeznutz.

2008-07-03 21:01:53

#4

HurricaИe: Banned; +877|6352|Washington DC

So first various middle eastern countries were a colony of Britain... now it's going the other way around

2008-07-03 21:01:54

#5

Parker: isteal; +1,452|6785|The Gem Saloon

that guy has a kick ass necklace.

2008-07-03 21:42:29

#6

Scorpion0x17: can detect anyone's visible post count...; +691|7157|Cambridge (UK)

deeznutz1245 wrote:
My question is this: if it is a contractual agrement other than British law, how would either party expect it to be governed by British law when one or both parties faults?

They don't.

As long as punishments don't contravene British law, then I don't really see any problem with this - it's like having a gentleman's agreement - it's not legally binding, but is informally binding - only in this case, any agreement entered into under Sharia law wouldn't be binding by British law, but may be by Sharia law.

2008-07-03 22:30:58

#7

M.O.A.B: 'Light 'em up!'; +1,220|6614|Escea

Parker wrote:
that guy has a kick ass necklace.

That be his medallion

2008-07-04 01:18:45

#8

CC-Marley: Member; +407|7220

Does that mean dear old dad could kill his wife/daughter for honor of the family?

2008-07-04 01:26:38

#9

PureFodder: Member; +225|6676

CC-Marley wrote:
Does that mean dear old dad could kill his wife/daughter for honor of the family?

No as that would go against a British law.

2008-07-04 01:31:14

#10

zeidmaan: Member; +234|6806|Vienna

CC-Marley wrote:
Does that mean dear old dad could kill his wife/daughter for honor of the family?

Aw cmon you know as well as I do that that wouldnt become legal man. Sharia courts for family and bussiness afairs, aswell as Jewish courts for the same things exist in many countries. They work within the paramaters of the native law and just take off a burden from the standard courts.
Sharia court even operates in Israel.

2008-07-04 01:39:42

#11

B.Schuss: I'm back, baby... ( sort of ); +664|7232|Cologne, Germany

I don't know what the big deal is. As the Lord Chief Justice said, as long as people enter into that contract voluntarily, what's the problem. No one is forcing them to follow sharia law if they don't want to.

2008-07-04 01:55:12

#12

BVC: Member; +325|7086

Sharia can go fuck itself.

2008-07-04 02:01:49

#13

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6946

"...mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution". Same as the Jewish courts they have over there in the UK.

PS The Iraqi constitution, the one supervised by the US, states that all law must come from Sharia.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-07-04 02:02:49)

2008-07-04 02:08:49

#14

JahManRed: wank; +646|7019|IRELAND

They already use it unofficially to sort out disputes. As Poe said. There is already Jewish courts. Are the hoards of Jews coming over the hills to ruin our way of life?

It will be superseded by UK law anyway.

We appease the Christians here in N.I, with a higher age of consent and no abortion which differs from UK law. And we are part of the uk.

Last edited by JahManRed (2008-07-04 02:11:07)

2008-07-04 02:39:01

#15

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6884|N. Ireland

"Should be" but realistically will it be?

I never understood those wigs.

2008-07-04 02:50:26

#16

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7062|UK

dont fuck with the wigs.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2008-07-04 02:50:28

#17

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6681|Éire

It's not a big deal, it sounds scarier than it actually is. As stated by others in this thread it's no different to the Jewish courts in the UK that no one ever seems to complain about.

2008-07-04 02:51:36

#18

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6884|N. Ireland

bye bye andrex dog then!

2008-07-04 02:54:20

#19

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6681|Éire

kylef wrote:
"Should be" but realistically will it be?

I never understood those wigs.

I think it goes back to the old days when the plague and other such nice diseases were around. I think the wigs were either to protect the hair from harbouring nasty molecules and germs or because they were all bald because of lice and wanted the illusion of hair...can't remember exactly, not sure if that's even correct but when I worked in the central criminal court my boss told me something along those lines.

Also, the crazy cloaks with the weird inside out pockets were to allow the barristers to take the cash from their clients without touching their filthy diseased hands.

2008-07-04 02:59:30

#20

JahManRed: wank; +646|7019|IRELAND

Braddock wrote:
kylef wrote:
"Should be" but realistically will it be?

I never understood those wigs.
I think it goes back to the old days when the plague and other such nice diseases were around. I think the wigs were either to protect the hair from harbouring nasty molecules and germs or because they were all bald because of lice and wanted the illusion of hair...can't remember exactly, not sure if that's even correct but when I worked was on trial in the central criminal court my bossSolicitor told me something along those lines.

Fixed that for you. Evil!!

2008-07-04 03:04:46

#21

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6681|Éire

JahManRed wrote:
Braddock wrote:
kylef wrote:
"Should be" but realistically will it be?

I never understood those wigs.
I think it goes back to the old days when the plague and other such nice diseases were around. I think the wigs were either to protect the hair from harbouring nasty molecules and germs or because they were all bald because of lice and wanted the illusion of hair...can't remember exactly, not sure if that's even correct but when I worked was on trial in the central criminal court my bossSolicitor told me something along those lines.
Fixed that for you. Evil!!

Lol...I actually had a real Larry David moment once when I was working there. I bumped into a guy I knew that I hadn't seen in years and got chatting - the usual mindless chit chat. Without thinking I foolishly asked if he was working there in the four courts to which he just replied "no"...I knew as soon as I had asked him that I shouldn't have, turns out his brother was on trial for something and he was in for the trial.

There was an awkward silence after that I can tell you!

2008-07-04 03:10:26

#22

FatherTed: xD; +3,936|6891|so randum

MSN wrote:
The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, emphatically ruled out the possibility of sharia courts sitting in this country or deciding penalties.

MSN wrote:
he said there was no reason why sharia principles could not be used in "mediation or other forms of alternative dispute resolution".

MSN wrote:
He added: "There can be no question of such courts sitting in this country, or such sanctions being applied here. So far as the law is concerned, those who live in this country are governed by English and Welsh law and subject to the jurisdiction of the English and Welsh courts."

Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

2008-07-04 03:38:36

#23

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7062|UK

This pleases me.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2008-07-04 04:21:18

#24

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|7012|London, England

Muslims are only like, 6% of the population. And they're not exactly influential in any form either. Don't need none of this shit.

Last edited by Mek-Stizzle (2008-07-04 04:21:51)

2008-07-04 04:25:20

#25

Switch: Knee Deep In Clunge; +489|6854|Tyne & Wear, England

Mek-Stizzle wrote:
Muslims are only like, 6% of the population. And they're not exactly influential in any form either. Don't need none of this shit.

2.8%

Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.

BF2S Forums Britain Pwned By Islam

deeznutz1245 wrote:

Parker wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

CC-Marley wrote:

kylef wrote:

Braddock wrote:

kylef wrote:

JahManRed wrote:

Braddock wrote:

kylef wrote:

MSN wrote:

MSN wrote:

MSN wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Board footer