Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6927|London, England
Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
So I'm guessing all that hard labour they did and physical and psychological damage they received wasn't enough.

> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
Right. Like I said before, I guess they just sat on their arse all day doing fuck all and got all of that for free like you said. Oh, how lucky they were.

A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
Except, it didn't, because they were slaves and were given peanuts (metaphorically)
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6649|tropical regions of london

Nu7 wrote:

100% facts




> SOURCES
> US CENSUS

> www.usdoj.gov
> www.fbi.gov
> www.crime.org

> US Population 300 million
> 36 Million blacks
> 220 Million Whites

> blacks do 46% of all Crime
> Whites do 33% of all crime

> blacks  graduate high school 56% of the time
> Whites graduate high school 76% of the time

> There are 36 million whites under the poverty line
> There are 9 million blacks  under the poverty line

> Now, explain why blacks  do more crime? Answer without idiot PC spin.
> ANSWER WITH FACT
> They aren't doing it because they are poor, if being poor made you a
> criminal, then
> whites would do 75% of the crime. Of course 89% of all crime done by
> whites is done
> by people under the poverty line. Why are blacks  such criminals?

> Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
> easy work(most blacks  were house help), and free healthcare. They were
> basically on
> welfare whereas the poor whites of that era lived in shit and had to work
> for everything
> they had. When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their
> masters because they
> had it a lot better than the whites that were free. A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
> dollars, would you abuse something you invested so much money in? 99% of
> whites did not own slaves.
> There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even
> blacks  owned blacks  slaves.
> There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and
> they were treated worse because
> they were given freedom after 7 years.
ban this peice of shit
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6267|Washington DC
The whole "they had food and clothing" argument was a classic used by supporters of slavery. Ya know, the New South folks.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6649|tropical regions of london
loot at his karma and the posts he got it for.
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6267|Washington DC
he could at least give some sources to his claims, rather than ambiguous links to government pages
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6861

Nu7 wrote:

100% facts




> SOURCES
> US CENSUS

> www.usdoj.gov
> www.fbi.gov
> www.crime.org

> US Population 300 million
> 36 Million blacks
> 220 Million Whites

> blacks do 46% of all Crime
> Whites do 33% of all crime

> blacks  graduate high school 56% of the time
> Whites graduate high school 76% of the time

> There are 36 million whites under the poverty line
> There are 9 million blacks  under the poverty line

> Now, explain why blacks  do more crime? Answer without idiot PC spin.
> ANSWER WITH FACT
> They aren't doing it because they are poor, if being poor made you a
> criminal, then
> whites would do 75% of the crime. Of course 89% of all crime done by
> whites is done
> by people under the poverty line. Why are blacks  such criminals?

> Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
> easy work(most blacks  were house help), and free healthcare. They were
> basically on
> welfare whereas the poor whites of that era lived in shit and had to work
> for everything
> they had. When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their
> masters because they
> had it a lot better than the whites that were free. A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
> dollars, would you abuse something you invested so much money in? 99% of
> whites did not own slaves.
> There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even
> blacks  owned blacks  slaves.
> There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and
> they were treated worse because
> they were given freedom after 7 years.
Stupid cunt much? Banjo player much?
Roc18
`
+655|6096|PROLLLY PROLLLY PROLLLY

God Save the Queen wrote:

loot at his karma and the posts he got it for.
He's a Redneck.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6649|tropical regions of london
he's a racist peice of shit
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6596|Éire

Nu7 wrote:

100% facts




> SOURCES
> US CENSUS

> www.usdoj.gov
> www.fbi.gov
> www.crime.org

> US Population 300 million
> 36 Million blacks
> 220 Million Whites

> blacks do 46% of all Crime
> Whites do 33% of all crime

> blacks  graduate high school 56% of the time
> Whites graduate high school 76% of the time

> There are 36 million whites under the poverty line
> There are 9 million blacks  under the poverty line

> Now, explain why blacks  do more crime? Answer without idiot PC spin.
> ANSWER WITH FACT
> They aren't doing it because they are poor, if being poor made you a
> criminal, then
> whites would do 75% of the crime. Of course 89% of all crime done by
> whites is done
> by people under the poverty line. Why are blacks  such criminals?

> Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
> easy work(most blacks  were house help), and free healthcare. They were
> basically on
> welfare whereas the poor whites of that era lived in shit and had to work
> for everything
> they had. When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their
> masters because they
> had it a lot better than the whites that were free. A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
> dollars, would you abuse something you invested so much money in? 99% of
> whites did not own slaves.
> There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even
> blacks  owned blacks  slaves.
> There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and
> they were treated worse because
> they were given freedom after 7 years.
What a wank stain. Can't even fucking type properly.

There's two 100% facts for you.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6596|Éire

God Save the Queen wrote:

loot at his karma and the posts he got it for.
I hope lowing is proud of the people he shares beliefs with.
Thorax
Banned
+77|6109

Braddock wrote:

Nu7 wrote:

100% facts




> SOURCES
> US CENSUS

> www.usdoj.gov
> www.fbi.gov
> www.crime.org

> US Population 300 million
> 36 Million blacks
> 220 Million Whites

> blacks do 46% of all Crime
> Whites do 33% of all crime

> blacks  graduate high school 56% of the time
> Whites graduate high school 76% of the time

> There are 36 million whites under the poverty line
> There are 9 million blacks  under the poverty line

> Now, explain why blacks  do more crime? Answer without idiot PC spin.
> ANSWER WITH FACT
> They aren't doing it because they are poor, if being poor made you a
> criminal, then
> whites would do 75% of the crime. Of course 89% of all crime done by
> whites is done
> by people under the poverty line. Why are blacks  such criminals?

> Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
> easy work(most blacks  were house help), and free healthcare. They were
> basically on
> welfare whereas the poor whites of that era lived in shit and had to work
> for everything
> they had. When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their
> masters because they
> had it a lot better than the whites that were free. A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
> dollars, would you abuse something you invested so much money in? 99% of
> whites did not own slaves.
> There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even
> blacks  owned blacks  slaves.
> There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and
> they were treated worse because
> they were given freedom after 7 years.
What a wank stain. Can't even fucking type properly.

There's two 100% facts for you.
Please state the historical inaccuracies in this please.
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6649|tropical regions of london
please find a source that isnt an email
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6927|London, England

Thorax wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Nu7 wrote:

*stupid long post*
What a wank stain. Can't even fucking type properly.

There's two 100% facts for you.
Please state the historical inaccuracies in this please.
What about my post at the top of this page
HurricaИe
Banned
+877|6267|Washington DC
I also like how people use statistics for a racist agenda. In my topic about crime I used them to make a point, but I made that topic as a "why does this happen and how can we try to change it".
FallenMorgan
Member
+53|6220|Glendale, CA

Nu7 wrote:

100% facts




> SOURCES
> US CENSUS

> www.usdoj.gov
> www.fbi.gov
> www.crime.org

> US Population 300 million
> 36 Million blacks
> 220 Million Whites

> blacks do 46% of all Crime
> Whites do 33% of all crime

> blacks  graduate high school 56% of the time
> Whites graduate high school 76% of the time

> There are 36 million whites under the poverty line
> There are 9 million blacks  under the poverty line

> Now, explain why blacks  do more crime? Answer without idiot PC spin.
> ANSWER WITH FACT
> They aren't doing it because they are poor, if being poor made you a
> criminal, then
> whites would do 75% of the crime. Of course 89% of all crime done by
> whites is done
> by people under the poverty line. Why are blacks  such criminals?

> Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
> easy work(most blacks  were house help), and free healthcare. They were
> basically on
> welfare whereas the poor whites of that era lived in shit and had to work
> for everything
> they had. When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their
> masters because they
> had it a lot better than the whites that were free. A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
> dollars, would you abuse something you invested so much money in? 99% of
> whites did not own slaves.
> There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even
> blacks  owned blacks  slaves.
> There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and
> they were treated worse because
> they were given freedom after 7 years.
Shut up.

If only 9 million blacks are under the poverty line as opposed to 36 million whites, isn't that counterproductive to your point?  Go back to your klan meeting.
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6752|Chicago, IL
the commercial claims blacks are better dancers than whites?

thats a fact, not racism...
God Save the Queen
Banned
+628|6649|tropical regions of london
I dont like the fact that people think Im good at baseball because Im half Dominican.
Thorax
Banned
+77|6109

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
So I'm guessing all that hard labour they did and physical and psychological damage they received wasn't enough.

> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
Right. Like I said before, I guess they just sat on their arse all day doing fuck all and got all of that for free like you said. Oh, how lucky they were.

A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
Except, it didn't, because they were slaves and were given peanuts (metaphorically)

God Save the Queen wrote:

ban this peice of shit

CameronPoe wrote:

Stupid cunt much? Banjo player much?

Braddock wrote:

What a wank stain. Can't even fucking type properly.

There's two 100% facts for you.

FallenMorgan wrote:

Shut up.

If only 9 million blacks are under the poverty line as opposed to 36 million whites, isn't that counterproductive to your point?  Go back to your klan meeting.
Still waiting to see evidence to the contrary instead of metaphorical points of view and 3rd grade insults.   I think most of you would be surprised to find that most (most, not all) of the points made in that shoddy email are in fact true.
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6596|Éire

Nu7 wrote:

Racist nonsense...Racist nonsense...Racist nonsense

Thorax wrote:

Please state the historical inaccuracies in this please.

Nu7 wrote:

Slavery was great for blacks. Free food, free home, free clothes,
Are there reliable records documenting the quality of food, clothing and accommodation given to slaves during this period? If so, I'd love to see them...I can't imagine too many objective statistics bodies back in that era. Also I wouldn't describe my 'owner' being allowed to beat me as "great" in any scenario.

Nu7 wrote:

Easy work(most blacks  were house help)
That's pure subjective opinion, not fact and therefore not considerable as 'accurate'. Also "most" isn't exactly an accurate amount.

Nu7 wrote:

When slavery ended, most blacks didn't want to leave their masters because they had it a lot better than the whites that were free.
Unless he can provide accurate historical information and statistics on this it is again opinion. Again, "most" isn't exactly an accurate amount.

Nu7 wrote:

There were only a few slave owners and all of them were rich men, even blacks owned blacks slaves.
"A few" isn't a very accurate amount. He claims only "a few" (yet another accurate amount!) people owned slaves and yet according to an 1860 census roughly 1 in 4 families in the Southern States had slaves...and how come he doesn't provide statistics for how many free blacks owned slaves? Is it perchance because there was nowhere near as many black slave owners as white or because many historians, such as James Oakes, claim that a lot of black slave ownership was done out of benevolence in the same way that Oscar Schindler recruited Jews to save them from labour camps and extermination?

Nu7 wrote:

There were also millions of WHITE SLAVES during that period as well and they were treated worse because they were given freedom after 7 years.
Again opinion and not fact. Why would a slave have it worse because he gets freedom after 7 years? That's like saying a prisoner with a 7 year sentance is worse off than someone serving life...utter nonsense.

And anyone who would choose to side with someone like this in an argument about race is obviously a toothless, banjo picking, redneck, simpleton.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6861

Thorax wrote:

Mek-Stizzle wrote:

Slavery ended 140 years ago. blacks  didn't deserve freedom, they didn't
> earn it,
So I'm guessing all that hard labour they did and physical and psychological damage they received wasn't enough.

> it was given to them. Slavery was great for blacks . Free food, free home,
> free clothes,
Right. Like I said before, I guess they just sat on their arse all day doing fuck all and got all of that for free like you said. Oh, how lucky they were.

A black slave costed
> about $150,000 in today's
Except, it didn't, because they were slaves and were given peanuts (metaphorically)

God Save the Queen wrote:

ban this peice of shit

CameronPoe wrote:

Stupid cunt much? Banjo player much?

Braddock wrote:

What a wank stain. Can't even fucking type properly.

There's two 100% facts for you.

FallenMorgan wrote:

Shut up.

If only 9 million blacks are under the poverty line as opposed to 36 million whites, isn't that counterproductive to your point?  Go back to your klan meeting.
Still waiting to see evidence to the contrary instead of metaphorical points of view and 3rd grade insults.   I think most of you would be surprised to find that most (most, not all) of the points made in that shoddy email are in fact true.
Cougar - half the thread was opinion ffs. Even you can realise that much. The point the guy made had nothing to do with the statistics he quoted. He's just a racist piece of shit. I'm sure if the shoe had been on the other foot he'd be singing a very different song. He advocated slavery, ergo he's a vacuous moron - no arguments required.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-07-03 16:37:35)

usmarine2
Banned
+233|6097|Dublin, Ohio
lol...srs section
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6596|Éire

Nu7 wrote:

http://www.civilwarhistory.com/slavetrade/blackslavery.htm
Get fucking real mate. That website looks like it was designed by a fucking child.

EDIT: And it goes against your argument, what's your story? A confused redneck?

Last edited by Braddock (2008-07-03 16:38:44)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6861
I find it very difficult to believe people like Nu7 actually still exist in the modern world. Troll?

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard