Why not just leave the country then and stop wasting troops/lives there?usmarine2 wrote:
We ran over Iraq twice in a matter of weeks. kthx.Megalomaniac wrote:
if you guys think Iran is such an easy country to take down why the fuck cant you handle Iraq and Afghanistan properly?
Stop poking into shit that doesn't concern you USA.
so we wont have to do it a 3rd time.Megalomaniac wrote:
Why not just leave the country then and stop wasting troops/lives there?usmarine2 wrote:
We ran over Iraq twice in a matter of weeks. kthx.Megalomaniac wrote:
if you guys think Iran is such an easy country to take down why the fuck cant you handle Iraq and Afghanistan properly?
Stop poking into shit that doesn't concern you USA.
kthx.
Not up to me. And I agree. We have a history of rebuilding nations. F that. Wam bam thank you ma'am.Megalomaniac wrote:
Why not just leave the country then and stop wasting troops/lives there?usmarine2 wrote:
We ran over Iraq twice in a matter of weeks. kthx.Megalomaniac wrote:
if you guys think Iran is such an easy country to take down why the fuck cant you handle Iraq and Afghanistan properly?
Stop poking into shit that doesn't concern you USA.
kthx.
Yea, Iraq was none of your concern either, why cant you just leave other countries alone ?usmarine2 wrote:
Not up to me. And I agree. We have a history of rebuilding nations. F that. Wam bam thank you ma'am.Megalomaniac wrote:
Why not just leave the country then and stop wasting troops/lives there?usmarine2 wrote:
We ran over Iraq twice in a matter of weeks. kthx.
kthx.
kthx
lol....retard.Megalomaniac wrote:
You cant really call it rebuilding, you destroy the country and the least you can do is clean up your own mess.
usmarine2 wrote:
lol....retard.Megalomaniac wrote:
You cant really call it rebuilding, you destroy the country and the least you can do is clean up your own mess.
9/11 was an inside job, just an excuse to attack countries with "Weapons of mass destruction"usmarine2 wrote:
yes saddam never did anything to provoke a war at all. damn americans.
9/11? are you a mental midget or just bored?Megalomaniac wrote:
9/11 was an inside job, just an excuse to attack countries with "Weapons of mass destruction"usmarine2 wrote:
yes saddam never did anything to provoke a war at all. damn americans.
(This should get things started)
Bored, but srsly US should just stay out of this, let the Jews pay the price of attacking insane Iraniansusmarine2 wrote:
9/11? are you a mental midget or just bored?Megalomaniac wrote:
9/11 was an inside job, just an excuse to attack countries with "Weapons of mass destruction"usmarine2 wrote:
yes saddam never did anything to provoke a war at all. damn americans.
(This should get things started)
Oh, I see. When Iran rattles the sabers, it's "statements of intent of self defense" but when anyone else does, it's "warmongering" and "threats".PureFodder wrote:
They aren't threats, they are statements of intent of self defence. They make absolutely no mention of doing anything to any Americans who aren't attacking Iran.FEOS wrote:
For those of you wondering...THOSE are threats. Offering to help Iran develop peaceful nuclear power is NOT. Just to clarify.
No, when a country is threatened and responds in kind its a statement of intent of self-defense.When Iran rattles the sabers, it's "statements of intent of self defense" but when anyone else does, it's "warmongering" and "threats".
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-06-26 01:13:19)
Iran says, if you attack us we will defend ourselves. The US says, if you do something we don't like we will attack you. Big difference.FEOS wrote:
Oh, I see. When Iran rattles the sabers, it's "statements of intent of self defense" but when anyone else does, it's "warmongering" and "threats".PureFodder wrote:
They aren't threats, they are statements of intent of self defence. They make absolutely no mention of doing anything to any Americans who aren't attacking Iran.FEOS wrote:
For those of you wondering...THOSE are threats. Offering to help Iran develop peaceful nuclear power is NOT. Just to clarify.
Got it.
Thanks for the clarification.
Umm. . . . .PureFodder wrote:
I'm sure the US military just collectively wet themselves at this realistic threat.
Last edited by fadedsteve (2008-06-26 01:45:55)
Apparently your sarcasm-o-meter hasn't warmed up yet today.fadedsteve wrote:
Umm. . . . .PureFodder wrote:
I'm sure the US military just collectively wet themselves at this realistic threat.
The US military is perfectly equipped with dealing with these assholes! The only thing our military is doing is waiting for the call so we can shut up these shitheads once and for all!
Wetting ourselves. . . . lol! Hardly pal! The US, Britain, and Israel will demolish these arrogants pricks in the blink of an eye!
Wait till we completely dismantle their anti air capability (in about a day) and can take "pot shots" at every military installation inside their country for weeks on end!!!! The Iranians have no fucking clue who and what they are messing with!
Sanctions arent gonna work. . . . . .talking aint gonna work. . . . . Its obvious what these pricks are up to, and the EU needs to grow some testicles and support a unified strike on ALL military/nuclear facilities NOW inside Iran. Iran is a fanatical, intollerant, racist regime that is not a model member of the world community. A regime that ACTIVELY supports and outsources terrorism worldwide, as well as harbors terrorist within its borders. They claim they are taking the worlds most dangerous element and simply harvesting it for engergy only?? THEY DONT NEED ENERGY, THEY ARE ONE OF THE WORLDS BIGGEST OIL DISTRIBUTERS IN THE WORLD!! They have energy coming out their fucking ears!! THEY WANT THE BOMB!!!! And any responsible, right minded individual can see that. . . . its time to fucking tap that ass!
Fixed.America is a fanatical, intolerant, racist regime that is not a model member of the world community.
Has it occurred to you maybe they have a plan slightly longer than the next fiscal quarter?THEY DONT NEED ENERGY, THEY ARE ONE OF THE WORLDS BIGGEST OIL DISTRIBUTERS IN THE WORLD!!
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-06-26 02:38:12)
Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.PureFodder wrote:
Iran says, if you attack us we will defend ourselves. The US says, if you do something we don't like we will attack you. Big difference.FEOS wrote:
Oh, I see. When Iran rattles the sabers, it's "statements of intent of self defense" but when anyone else does, it's "warmongering" and "threats".PureFodder wrote:
They aren't threats, they are statements of intent of self defence. They make absolutely no mention of doing anything to any Americans who aren't attacking Iran.
Got it.
Thanks for the clarification.
It's the difference between saying 'if you illegally enter my house I'll shoot you' and 'If you piss me off, I'm coming round to your house to kill you'.
The US is constantly saying 'The military option is on the table'.Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.
No. It's not.Dilbert_X wrote:
The US is constantly saying 'The military option is on the table'.Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.
Bush said it.
McCain said it.
Obama said it.
Jesus H Clinton said it.
Thats a threat of an attack, plain and simple, exactly mirroring the rhetoric against Iraq.
No it's not, but the US didn't announce that they have soldiers. They said that military options are on the table if Iran doesn't do what the US wants.FEOS wrote:
No. It's not.Dilbert_X wrote:
The US is constantly saying 'The military option is on the table'.Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.
Bush said it.
McCain said it.
Obama said it.
Jesus H Clinton said it.
Thats a threat of an attack, plain and simple, exactly mirroring the rhetoric against Iraq.
I have a gun in my house.
Was that threat?
So you would agree Agmdinnerjadawhatever miss quoted threat to "wipe Israel off the map" is the same?FEOS wrote:
No. It's not.Dilbert_X wrote:
The US is constantly saying 'The military option is on the table'.Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.
Bush said it.
McCain said it.
Obama said it.
Jesus H Clinton said it.
Thats a threat of an attack, plain and simple, exactly mirroring the rhetoric against Iraq.
I have a gun in my house.
Was that threat?
In most countries you would go to prison for saying that. You'd certainly forfeit your gun license.Feos wrote:
I have a gun in my house.
Was that threat?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-06-26 06:28:39)
Course they have. Israel has said even more. And anything Israel says goes, can't be going against the will of the big G now can you. Course the Iranians will say it's big Al that's telling 'em to get rid of Israel, both sides are too stupid to realise they're the same personFEOS wrote:
Since the US hasn't threatened Iran with attack, I guess Iran is threatening us.
He didn't even say that, he said Israel should be wiped from the pages of history.So you would agree Agmdinnerjadawhatever miss quoted threat to "wipe Israel off the map" is the same?
Last edited by Dilbert_X (2008-06-26 06:32:06)
