War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6935|Purplicious Wisconsin
I think keeping the m24 as the sniper for sas is stupid, unreal, atleast put the l96 in it.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
sheggalism
Member
+16|6963|France
Right ! and the P90 instead of the MP5 too for AT.
Eckzack
The east-german Fuxxer
+37|7065|Germany / Saxony
That would be awesome...
https://bf3s.com/sigs/384f5f7318c23ecb5909f14b157d6d31e8b5a332.png

IRNV-Field 3... New School Shit...
Erwin_Rommel188
Member
+59|6906|Seattle
And it makes sense...
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6935|Purplicious Wisconsin

sheggalism wrote:

Right ! and the P90 instead of the MP5 too for AT.
Don't care about the P90, because british use the mp5 more than the p90 except for the royal air force which uses the p90, but the L96 is deffinently is in the british army.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6935|Purplicious Wisconsin
Perhaps the P90 could be added for the rebals except when they are facing the british.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Gooners
Wiki Contributor
+2,700|6853

War Man wrote:

Perhaps the P90 could be added for the rebals except when they are facing the british.
Nah i think it should be for the Sas team..... Cuz the mp5 sucks
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6935|Purplicious Wisconsin

Gooners wrote:

War Man wrote:

Perhaps the P90 could be added for the rebals except when they are facing the british.
Nah i think it should be for the Sas team..... Cuz the mp5 sucks
p90 is even crappier, its rate of fire is so crap I rather prefer the mp5.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
War Man
Australians are hermaphrodites.
+563|6935|Purplicious Wisconsin
The  ak47's  rate  of  fire  is a little  higher than p90.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,053|6993|PNW

My SAS stats: 05:56:39(H)      24(W)      1(L)      24.00(R)      125(BR)

Do we honestly need to give them even more of an advantage?

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-03-19 05:07:58)

dankassasin42o
Member
+68|6900|Reefersyde, CA
yes they do need to fix this i want my l96a1 in SF NOW DAMN IT!!!1
EvilMonkeySlayer
Member
+82|6873
I couldn't agree more, it makes no logical sense. The standard sniper rifle for the entire British armed forces is the L96A1. To my knowledge there are NO M24's whatsoever and frankly why would they?

War Man wrote:

Don't care about the P90, because british use the mp5 more than the p90 except for the royal air force which uses the p90, but the L96 is deffinently is in the british army.
I'm not sure on the P90 or MP5.. The SAS haven't been seen publically in a counter-terrorist operation in years, they may no longer use the MP5 in CQB. They were seen publically equipping up when the failed 21st July terrorists were arrested. So, whether they use the P90, MP5 or other is debatable.

As to their use ingame, all the submachine guns seem to universally suck. Although, the MP7 isn't all that bad at close quarters because of its high rof.
0mikr0n
Airborne Clan
+19|6917
The L96A1 is a weapon manufactured by "Accuracy International", a British company. They would more-than-likely use a weapon of their own make as opposed to an American-made Remington M24. I support the idea of a swap.

Last edited by 0mikr0n (2006-05-14 14:30:08)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard