could we influence you to stop posting?Enzzenmachine wrote:
US do influence europe.
Poll
Which country is the biggest pain in the arse
| China-butchering Tibetan monks is so 1950's | 23% | 23% - 54 | ||||
| Iran-fomenting conflict on multiple fronts | 23% | 23% - 53 | ||||
| Russia-crushing dissent and causing general mayhem | 11% | 11% - 26 | ||||
| Venezuela-Hugo Chavez supports FARC, nuff said | 3% | 3% - 8 | ||||
| America-- pimple on the ass of the world | 38% | 38% - 88 | ||||
| Total: 229 | ||||||
heh, i loledGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
could we influence you to stop posting?Enzzenmachine wrote:
US do influence europe.
Its got a name and it is a country, proper or not if that relates to size, its still a nation.Braddock wrote:
The Israelis won't let them have a proper nation so they can't make the list!M.O.A.B wrote:
Don't forget PalestineBraddock wrote:
Also, if Iran are worthy of the list despite any credible ability to cause damage outside their own backyard then Israel should make the list too.
those ingrateful brits, whose asses have been saved by the americans but who still hate us because of their obscene jealousy.
Being a chinese with German nationality, I do think that China is making alot of ''troubles'' recently. Human rights aren't that important compared to other countries like Germany, which is, what other countries think, a con for China. But tbh, the title of the thread must be more precise: We need to know, who is making trouble for WHOM?
I voted iran.
As much trouble as the US causes, they aren't even in the same league as half the middle eastern countries.
As much trouble as the US causes, they aren't even in the same league as half the middle eastern countries.
It's hard to cause trouble on a large scale when you can't even move freely within your own land.M.O.A.B wrote:
Its got a name and it is a country, proper or not if that relates to size, its still a nation.Braddock wrote:
The Israelis won't let them have a proper nation so they can't make the list!M.O.A.B wrote:
Don't forget Palestine
French Resistance in WW2Braddock wrote:
It's hard to cause trouble on a large scale when you can't even move freely within your own land.M.O.A.B wrote:
Its got a name and it is a country, proper or not if that relates to size, its still a nation.Braddock wrote:
The Israelis won't let them have a proper nation so they can't make the list!
Did the French resistance cause much trouble outside France? I always think that term is such an oxymoron... French resistance.M.O.A.B wrote:
French Resistance in WW2Braddock wrote:
It's hard to cause trouble on a large scale when you can't even move freely within your own land.M.O.A.B wrote:
Its got a name and it is a country, proper or not if that relates to size, its still a nation.
No they didn't but then again they still caused large scale trouble within France,Braddock wrote:
Did the French resistance cause much trouble outside France? I always think that term is such an oxymoron... French resistance.M.O.A.B wrote:
French Resistance in WW2Braddock wrote:
It's hard to cause trouble on a large scale when you can't even move freely within your own land.
Lol, it's still America. Whatever though, we have the best military. Freedom. We're the most bad ass country there is.
Suckers.
Suckers.
It does help when you've got the Allied forces on your side. I like the way you've compared the Palestinian cause to the heroism of the French resistance and their battle with the Nazis though!M.O.A.B wrote:
No they didn't but then again they still caused large scale trouble within France,Braddock wrote:
Did the French resistance cause much trouble outside France? I always think that term is such an oxymoron... French resistance.M.O.A.B wrote:
French Resistance in WW2
Actually was more of the comparison between causing trouble and not being able to move freely.Braddock wrote:
It does help when you've got the Allied forces on your side. I like the way you've compared the Palestinian cause to the heroism of the French resistance and their battle with the Nazis though!M.O.A.B wrote:
No they didn't but then again they still caused large scale trouble within France,Braddock wrote:
Did the French resistance cause much trouble outside France? I always think that term is such an oxymoron... French resistance.
Pal cause is still fail in how its carried out which in no way can be compared to the French Resistance as in no way can the Nazis and waht they did but compared with how the Israelis handle thigns. But this isn't an Israel thread (god forbid another) so I'm just gonna leave it at that.
Name 2 times.G3|Genius wrote:
those ingrateful brits, whose asses have been saved by the americans but who still hate us because of their obscene jealousy.
oh... wait.
Anyway, i stand by my choice of vote as USA.
Next time there's a poll like this. Put Europe up there.
Try to post something a bit smart, it should influence me.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
could we influence you to stop posting?Enzzenmachine wrote:
US do influence europe.
no. just stop posting.
Hint: "nation".ThaReaper wrote:
Next time there's a poll like this. Put Europe up there.
the EU doesnt count? You could only speak about one united Europe when we arent being critical? I see.
that was pretty low. I'd think you'd have said something more characteristic of your blatent arrogance. lemme lmao.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
no. just stop posting.
if you think thats low...Enzzenmachine wrote:
that was pretty low. I'd think you'd have said something more characteristic of your blatent arrogance. lemme lmao.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
no. just stop posting.
Well, lets have a look...GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
the EU doesnt count?
China: country.
Iran: country.
Russia: country.
Venezuela: country.
America: country.
EU: political and economic community of twenty-seven member states.
No, the EU doesn't count.
blablablahGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
if you think thats low...Enzzenmachine wrote:
that was pretty low. I'd think you'd have said something more characteristic of your blatent arrogance. lemme lmao.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
no. just stop posting.
Fucking Russia are a pain in the ass.
thats lowEnzzenmachine wrote:
blablablahGunSlinger OIF II wrote:
if you think thats low...Enzzenmachine wrote:
that was pretty low. I'd think you'd have said something more characteristic of your blatent arrogance. lemme lmao.