Ok this really got through with me, after I graduate I'm getting some of these babies
Thanks for letting me know
Thanks for letting me know
I'm talking about the byproducts of making those photovoltaic materials (and batteries and such). It's not an emissions problem, it's a pollutant problem.B.Schuss wrote:
well, obviously the idea is to make the whole production and distribution chain totally emission-free at some point in the future.FEOS wrote:
It's not just CO2...there are much nastier things that are the byproducts of production.Burwhale the Avenger wrote:
Hey Schuss , I have applied to get a 1kW/hr array on my roof. It will cost a total of $1500 Australian if the deal is accepted ( that is after rebates etc). With your system, does the power get fed into the grid directly, or does it charge up batteries that you use to run lights, appliances etc.
Obviously my veiw is that it is a great thing, and will reduce my power costs, along with a significant reduction in Greenhouse gases, so its all win.
FEOS makes a good point that the production of the panels will produce pollutants, however most panels have a life expectancy of 25 years or so, therefore can more than account for the CO2 emitted during production.
And since solar energy can power anything, from machinery, to production plants, to tranport vehicles, I wouldn't know why this shouldn't be possible.
I mean, think about it. Why would a company as big as GM or Volkswagen want to pay someone else for the energy they use, if they could just as well produce that energy themselves, for free ? I mean, they have literally got acres of roof space to use here...
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2008-03-12 07:02:35)
The problem is that the same can be said for nuclear power. Nobody seems to look at the impact, both in terms of fossil fuels used and environmental impact of mining uranium to be used in these plants. In Southern Utah we have a super fund site that sits right on Colorado River, which came from uranium mining.FEOS wrote:
I'm talking about the byproducts of making those photovoltaic materials (and batteries and such). It's not an emissions problem, it's a pollutant problem.B.Schuss wrote:
well, obviously the idea is to make the whole production and distribution chain totally emission-free at some point in the future.FEOS wrote:
It's not just CO2...there are much nastier things that are the byproducts of production.
And since solar energy can power anything, from machinery, to production plants, to tranport vehicles, I wouldn't know why this shouldn't be possible.
I mean, think about it. Why would a company as big as GM or Volkswagen want to pay someone else for the energy they use, if they could just as well produce that energy themselves, for free ? I mean, they have literally got acres of roof space to use here...
It could be a wash, but it might not be. The problem is nobody is looking at that aspect of the technologies.
as I said, around 20.000 € for the whole system. It brings in 180,00 € per month from the power company, for the energy that I put into the grid.mtb0minime wrote:
How much did those solar panels cost? While they might save you money in the long run, and in some cases could get the power company to buy power from you, solar cells are extremely inefficient (only between 10 and 30 % I think) and expensive to install.
at the moment, no. It is not yet allowed to store your own energy, because the technology ain't there yet for average consumers to handle safely...teddy..jimmy wrote:
Sounds likes an excellent idea tbh. The only challenge I'd have in Norway would be the lack of sunlight available for the conversion of energy. Does it have the capability of storing the energy once converted?
http://www.news.com/8301-11128_3-9889848-54.html?FEOS wrote:
I wonder what kind of a pollutant footprint the production of those PV arrays made...
Not that I am against solar power or alternate energy (I am just graduating 7 years of electrical engineering) but you have to hand it to the Chinese, they will go above and beyond to make a fast buck. Their situation, well each village has very little money, but if they rape the environment they can prosper in the globalized economy (Don't get me wrong - NA/EU/RU etc. have already raped their environments and often continue to do so).The newspaper describes green fields in the nation's eastern central Henan Province that have turned snow white from the powdery waste of silicon tetrachloride, four tons of which result from every ton of polysilicon created. Toxic hydrogen chloride gas and acids waft from the waste.
The waste is allegedly coming from Chinese polysilicon maker Luoyang Zhonggui High-Technology, a supplier of rising solar power star Suntech Power, according to the Washington Post.
"In China, polysilicon plants are the new dot-coms," writes Ariana Eunjung Cha, reporting that new factories there are set to produce more than twice the amount of polysilicon as is currently manufactured in the world. Silicon tetrachloride can be recycled. But manufacturers reportedly can make polysilicon about two-thirds more cheaply if they ignore environmental protections.
It was an energy conversion course in my undergraduate degree program (also EE) that brought the overall "pollution/energy budget" up. Quite eye-opening.[CANADA]_Zenmaster wrote:
(I am just graduating 7 years of electrical engineering)
andB.Schuss wrote:
Last year, I installed a photovoltaics array on the roof of my house. It's only a couple of square meters
2 m² solar panels, in not-always-so-sunny germany, makes you a net contributor to the power grid?B.Schuss wrote:
I won't have to pay a single dime to a power company for the rest of my life.
Instead, they are now paying me 180,00 € per month for the energy I send into their system.
Because saying stuff like, for example, 'RAID array' is much more cool than jotting down 'big stack of hard drives.'Tehremos wrote:
when you wrote "photovoltaics array" it sounded like you wanted it to sound "treky". Why didn't you just put solar panels?
How about a great big UPS?B.Schuss wrote:
Right now, we're not allowed to store our own energy, but that will come sooner or later.
You know nuclear power is basically 100% safe and in the long term probably less damaging than solar panels. Nuclear radiation is seriously not very harmful, especially with some of the new isotopes with ridiculously short half life.Burwhale the Avenger wrote:
I am sure there are other byproducts of solar panel production however I would bet that they would be a million times less than the by products associated with a coal fired power station or a nuclear power station.FEOS wrote:
It's not just CO2...there are much nastier things that are the byproducts of production.
Our local Building Control Authority, responsible for how you build your home, just finished 3 years of test with mind to force new homes to include some form of renewable cost efficient energy. At the end of the studies they couldn't actually find a renewable energy that was cost efficient. The install price plus the maintenance costs added to the life span of the products was less that just buying the electricity from the grid.IRONCHEF wrote:
But addressing the OP, I wish it would be mandatory by 5 or 10 years time for all suburban and urban residences to provide a renewable/alternative energy source for their own power...at the expense of government subsidy...something perfect for the government to fund.
when I said "a couple" I wasn't literally speaking of 2m². It's a bit more than that. We have got 25 modules with a total area of around 30m² up there.apollo_fi wrote:
andB.Schuss wrote:
Last year, I installed a photovoltaics array on the roof of my house. It's only a couple of square meters2 m² solar panels, in not-always-so-sunny germany, makes you a net contributor to the power grid?B.Schuss wrote:
I won't have to pay a single dime to a power company for the rest of my life.
Instead, they are now paying me 180,00 € per month for the energy I send into their system.
Kickass panels you've got, if this is indeed the case. What make are your PV cells?
OK, thanks, now it makes sense.B.Schuss wrote:
the electricity that we put into the grid is supported by the german government, that amounted to over 2.000,00 € in pay-off, way more than what we had to pay for electricity the same year. So it's a good deal, at least under the current circumstances.