Poll

Are things getting better?

Yes. The future looks bright.41%41% - 46
No. The future looks worse than it is now.34%34% - 38
Neither. It looks like more of the same.24%24% - 27
Total: 111
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85

Spearhead wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

That doesn't mean I'm going to roll over to give them a chance to express their views.
You don't think people should be able to express their views? 

:\
No, I'm not going to be responsible for giving them a chance to express their views on a silver platter. I want them to work for it.

Example, look how many times in DAST that one side of the political spectrum strongly enforces their view in the first five posts, and then nine times out of ten that side is on the attack, and the other is on defense. I think that is awesome, and fun to watch.

Besides, it's not like it's always lopsided, the two switch offense/defense all the time depending who is on. Dead even or lopsided is a lot less fun to watch than slightly leaning one way.

ATG that's what I meant to say, that's not what I meant to mean.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
Int
eresting

Last edited by ATG (2008-02-23 09:31:54)

Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7056|Tampa Bay Florida

ATG wrote:

Int
eresting
rofl
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6967|132 and Bush

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

My posts all come from the same brain, there can be no difference in maturity between them. The only difference is how much you agree with them or not.
It's called inconsistency. Everyone has it from time to time. Even the most elite here.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Mentioning the Nazis is pretty much bad debate form across the board. There are a slew of other examples that could have been chosen, but you chose that one. I tend to think you were just a little riled up at me from my previous post and it was a reactionary example.
You tend to think wrong then. I have now told you three times that I simply picked a situation. I'd rather you just call me a liar than continue along this pretentious path of seeing into a persons true soul.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Happier if I do what? Stop analyzing the people I meet? Stop looking for their bias so I can play to it? Stop trying to determine who is competent and can be trusted, and who is an incompetent fool? The things I have learned and the benefits I have reaped from it are some of the most important things in my life.
Happier when you stop letting another persons feeling impact you so much that it pisses you off. Getting angry at someone who expresses their emotions is not the same as being level headed in sizing up a persons competence level.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I don't like liars and fakes. These people that I am talking about, who I said, "Nothing pisses me off more than when someone hears a story about a brutal murder or rape and acts all sad about it." about, are liars and fakes. They say "Oh that is so sad, I feel so sorry for that person," bullshit. They don't feel sorry for that person at all, if they actually did they would do something, anything to rectify the situation, or at least it would still be on their mind an hour later. It isn't even important enough for them to keep it in their thoughts, but, like Pavlov's dog, they have been trained to cry at every socially-defined heartbreaking story they see. There are some cases where people do feel truly bad for the wronged party, but they are in the minority.
Nice, so your presume they are lying and being fake about their personal feelings. People relate when they hear these stories. It doesn't mean it will affect their lives, but they imagine how it must feel to be in the situation and it generates emotion for them.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I am young, yes. However I have been told a whole slew of things would change when I become a teenager (awkward years my ass), and very, very few of their projections were realized. I have had it beaten into head by my parents, by the media, by my friends, and by just about every older person I meet that doesn't meet me through some sort of screening. They all seemed to be so sure they knew about my priorities, my political leanings, my interests, my responsibilities, and how these aspects would change in five years. It was about 90% a load of crap, and because of that I consider the 10% of stuff they were right about to be a coincidence as a result. So you'll have to excuse me when I don't think you will ever be able to tell what will make me happy or not as I "mature".
Although you can tell when everyone else should be happy or sad.

No I'm not sure that you will change, I never claimed to. Unlike you I am aware that individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I have no problems amusing myself.

Kmarion wrote:

You said it not me. <insert tremendous winking yellow face>
Lighten up, impossible to resist.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

No, I'm not going to be responsible for giving them a chance to express their views on a silver platter. I want them to work for it.

Example, look how many times in DAST that one side of the political spectrum strongly enforces their view in the first five posts, and then nine times out of ten that side is on the attack, and the other is on defense. I think that is awesome, and fun to watch.

Besides, it's not like it's always lopsided, the two switch offense/defense all the time depending who is one. Dead even or lopsided is a lot less fun to watch than slightly leaning one way.

ATG that's what I meant to say, that's not what I meant to mean.
Arguing for the sake of arguing. How very troll like of you
Xbone Stormsurgezz
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
Here guys...

toss
toss
toss
toss


https://www.popcornindiana.com/images/movie-theater-popcorn.jpg
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7056|Tampa Bay Florida

ATG wrote:

Here guys...

toss
toss
toss
toss


http://www.popcornindiana.com/images/mo … opcorn.jpg
*catches*

Why thank you ATG

*leans back in chair and put feets up on table*
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

My posts all come from the same brain, there can be no difference in maturity between them. The only difference is how much you agree with them or not.
It's called inconsistency. Everyone has it from time to time. Even the most elite here.


In my opinion inconsistency on the part of the poster only comes from differing emotions, I only post in DAST when I'm in a good mood. All the posts I have ever made in this section came from the same individual, and they can all be unified under the same thought-process, even these. I have never made contradictory posts to what I have posted on this thread, and if you asked my opinion on this subject when I happened to be posting less "abnormally shallow" posts I would have replied the same. My opinions on different subjects are just different facets on a beautiful diamond, no flaws here. You just happened to turn the diamond over to a side you didn't find as appealing.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Mentioning the Nazis is pretty much bad debate form across the board. There are a slew of other examples that could have been chosen, but you chose that one. I tend to think you were just a little riled up at me from my previous post and it was a reactionary example.
You tend to think wrong then. I have now told you three times that I simply picked a situation. I'd rather you just call me a liar than continue along this pretentious path of seeing into a persons true soul.
You "simply pick" some really extremist examples then. The laws of physics break down past the speed of light, political ideas break down in extremism.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Happier if I do what? Stop analyzing the people I meet? Stop looking for their bias so I can play to it? Stop trying to determine who is competent and can be trusted, and who is an incompetent fool? The things I have learned and the benefits I have reaped from it are some of the most important things in my life.
Happier when you stop letting another persons feeling impact you so much that it pisses you off. Getting angry at someone who expresses their emotions is not the same as being level headed in sizing up a persons competence level.
It takes either a lot of people or a lot of stupidity to really get me riled up. I don't get nearly as angry as quickly as I think you're saying I do, but facetious people are one of my pet peeves.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I don't like liars and fakes. These people that I am talking about, who I said, "Nothing pisses me off more than when someone hears a story about a brutal murder or rape and acts all sad about it." about, are liars and fakes. They say "Oh that is so sad, I feel so sorry for that person," bullshit. They don't feel sorry for that person at all, if they actually did they would do something, anything to rectify the situation, or at least it would still be on their mind an hour later. It isn't even important enough for them to keep it in their thoughts, but, like Pavlov's dog, they have been trained to cry at every socially-defined heartbreaking story they see. There are some cases where people do feel truly bad for the wronged party, but they are in the minority.
Nice, so your presume they are lying and being fake about their personal feelings. People relate when they hear these stories. It doesn't mean it will affect their lives, but they imagine how it must feel to be in the situation and it generates emotion for them.
Yes, no, to some degree.

Do you think a single person in my well-off suburban neighborhood can relate to starvation? You think they can relate to being raped and abused? They cannot personally relate to any of these people halfway across the world in circumstances that are many times worse than anything they have ever experienced, and to say they can only insults the people in despair.

Will it stir up some emotions? Of course, at some level every normal human being has natural instincts kick in when it sees other humans in terrible circumstances, but there is no substance behind them. They are as meaningful as a knee-jerk reflex.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I am young, yes. However I have been told a whole slew of things would change when I become a teenager (awkward years my ass), and very, very few of their projections were realized. I have had it beaten into head by my parents, by the media, by my friends, and by just about every older person I meet that doesn't meet me through some sort of screening. They all seemed to be so sure they knew about my priorities, my political leanings, my interests, my responsibilities, and how these aspects would change in five years. It was about 90% a load of crap, and because of that I consider the 10% of stuff they were right about to be a coincidence as a result. So you'll have to excuse me when I don't think you will ever be able to tell what will make me happy or not as I "mature".
Although you can tell when everyone else should be happy or sad.

No I'm not sure that you will change, I never claimed to. Unlike you I am aware that individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life.
You didn't claim I would change, you claimed I would be better for it, implying I should change. I disagree.

You are aware individuals follow their own path and react differently to things in life, but I should do x action to make myself happier?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

I have no problems amusing myself.

Kmarion wrote:

You said it not me. <insert tremendous winking yellow face>
Lighten up, impossible to resist.
Getting confused where you're going with this?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

No, I'm not going to be responsible for giving them a chance to express their views on a silver platter. I want them to work for it.

Example, look how many times in DAST that one side of the political spectrum strongly enforces their view in the first five posts, and then nine times out of ten that side is on the attack, and the other is on defense. I think that is awesome, and fun to watch.

Besides, it's not like it's always lopsided, the two switch offense/defense all the time depending who is one. Dead even or lopsided is a lot less fun to watch than slightly leaning one way.

ATG that's what I meant to say, that's not what I meant to mean.
Arguing for the sake of arguing. How very troll like of you
You contest DAST is anything else, or that there is anything wrong with that?

And you cheat, you don't respond to all the points.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
Epic

https://img293.imageshack.us/img293/7331/ridinghorseal2.gif
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85
ATG is having way too much fun in this thread.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7056|Tampa Bay Florida

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

ATG is having way too much fun in this thread.
I also like how even though I started it (debate with you), Kmarion took over for me  

You're outnumbered but still fighting on, FM.  Good for you.

Last edited by Spearhead (2008-02-23 12:32:16)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6967|132 and Bush

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

In my opinion inconsistency on the part of the poster only comes from differing emotions, I only post in DAST when I'm in a good mood. All the posts I have ever made in this section came from the same individual, and they can all be unified under the same thought-process, even these. I have never made contradictory posts to what I have posted on this thread, and if you asked my opinion on this subject when I happened to be posting less "abnormally shallow" posts I would have replied the same. My opinions on different subjects are just different facets on a beautiful diamond, no flaws here. awsm You just happened to turn the diamond over to a side you didn't find as appealing.
Don't flatter yourself. It's not the content of your opinion that I deemed shallow. I see what I feel to be flaws in other people opinion also. Yet they remain consistent to what I feel is normal in their general line of thought.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You "simply pick" some really extremist examples then. The laws of physics break down past the speed of light, political ideas break down in extremism.
I did it for clarity. You are grasping and straws here.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

It takes either a lot of people or a lot of stupidity to really get me riled up. I don't get nearly as angry as quickly as I think you're saying I do, but facetious people are one of my pet peeves.
Someone being sad at a rape or murder isn't exactly abnormal. I didn't say it pissed you off, you did.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Do you think a single person in my well-off suburban neighborhood can relate to starvation? You think they can relate to being raped and abused? They cannot personally relate to any of these people halfway across the world in circumstances that are many times worse than anything they have ever experienced, and to say they can only insults the people in despair.

Will it stir up some emotions? Of course, at some level every normal human being has natural instincts kick in when it sees other humans in terrible circumstances, but there is no substance behind them. They are as meaningful as a knee-jerk reflex.
It triggers emotions whether you have experienced it or not. It's a natural human instinct. My girlfriend cried after watching the movie Titanic. Somehow I managed to walk out of the theater without being pissed off at her even though she wasn't on board the ship. People imagine what it must feel like. It is a normal response. If it motivates someone to change the world for the better it most certainly is meaningful.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You didn't claim I would change, you claimed I would be better for it, implying I should change. I disagree.

You are aware individuals follow their own path and react differently to things in life, but I should do x action to make myself happier?
You have a real problem with making presumptions. When I said "Unlike you I am aware that individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life." that is precisely what I meant. If you want to pursue your all knowing, get pissed off at other peoples feelings attitude go for it. Capiche?


Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Getting confused where you're going with this?
I was kidding with you Mr.rolleyes. That's it.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You contest DAST is anything else, or that there is anything wrong with that?

And you cheat, you don't respond to all the points.
Actually I do. I can agree or reinforce a point without stirring up the water for the hell of it.

Big surprise, you made another presumption (that I cheated and ignored a point). It couldn't at all be possible that in the mess of quoting you seven times that I incidentally missed something you said?

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

ATG is having way too much fun in this thread.
He is just happy that he gets a chance to use some smilies.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
https://img341.imageshack.us/img341/4830/actorhx5.gif I think this thread demonstrates that mod arehttps://i18.tinypic.com/35lgd9u.gif people too.

It https://i1.tinypic.com/81gxpvp.gifalso negates my previously stated contention that sometimes mods hang their balls at the door ( in regards to stating opinions about issues ).https://i16.tinypic.com/35i18ic.gif


I will, with TLC to both parties refrain from smirking at the https://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2901/beatingsn5.gif debate.
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

In my opinion inconsistency on the part of the poster only comes from differing emotions, I only post in DAST when I'm in a good mood. All the posts I have ever made in this section came from the same individual, and they can all be unified under the same thought-process, even these. I have never made contradictory posts to what I have posted on this thread, and if you asked my opinion on this subject when I happened to be posting less "abnormally shallow" posts I would have replied the same. My opinions on different subjects are just different facets on a beautiful diamond, no flaws here. awsm You just happened to turn the diamond over to a side you didn't find as appealing.
Don't flatter yourself. It's not the content of your opinion that I deemed shallow. I see what I feel to be flaws in other people opinion also. Yet they remain consistent to what I feel is normal in their general line of thought.
Flatter myself? But my mind is a beautiful diamond.

You cannot find flaws in someone's opinion standing on its own, you can only find flaws between what you thought their opinion is and what their opinion actually is. At worst this is unexpected, but this is perfectly in line with the rest of my ideals. Thinking you know what someone's general line of thought is being quite presumptuous yourself.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You "simply pick" some really extremist examples then. The laws of physics break down past the speed of light, political ideas break down in extremism.
I did it for clarity. You are grasping and straws here.
Extremes give way to clarity? In my experience they twist the truth.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

It takes either a lot of people or a lot of stupidity to really get me riled up. I don't get nearly as angry as quickly as I think you're saying I do, but facetious people are one of my pet peeves.
Someone being sad at a rape or murder isn't exactly abnormal. I didn't say it pissed you off, you did.
Yes, these specific incidences get me riled up, but everyone has particular subjects they get all touchy over.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Do you think a single person in my well-off suburban neighborhood can relate to starvation? You think they can relate to being raped and abused? They cannot personally relate to any of these people halfway across the world in circumstances that are many times worse than anything they have ever experienced, and to say they can only insults the people in despair.

Will it stir up some emotions? Of course, at some level every normal human being has natural instincts kick in when it sees other humans in terrible circumstances, but there is no substance behind them. They are as meaningful as a knee-jerk reflex.
It triggers emotions whether you have experienced it or not. It's a natural human instinct. My girlfriend cried after watching the movie Titanic. Somehow I managed to walk out of the theater without being pissed off at her even though she wasn't on board the ship. People imagine what it must feel like. It is a normal response. If it motivates someone to change the world for the better it most certainly is meaningful.
As I said it does trigger emotions, but to be so blatant as to say you can relate to the situation is truly degrading. Unchecked emotional responses are utterly meaningless in a rational world, so you better actually mean what you say when you open your trap about caring for someone.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You didn't claim I would change, you claimed I would be better for it, implying I should change. I disagree.

You are aware individuals follow their own path and react differently to things in life, but I should do x action to make myself happier?
You have a real problem with making presumptions. When I said "Unlike you I am aware that individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life." that is precisely what I meant. If you want to pursue your all knowing, get pissed off at other peoples feelings attitude go for it. Capiche?
But if I do pursue that path I won't be as happy as if I pursued your life path, right?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Getting confused where you're going with this?
I was kidding with you Mr.rolleyes. That's it.
Thought so, you kind of lost me with that last one.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

You contest DAST is anything else, or that there is anything wrong with that?
Actually I do. I can agree or reinforce a point without stirring up the water for the hell of it.
But as a whole, DAST is only controlled arguing, I don't see any action being taken. Nothing is wrong with just agreeing with someone or expanding on their ideas, but as a whole DAST is a news service and arguing for the sake of arguing. Not that I think there is anything wrong with that, obviously.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

And you cheat, you don't respond to all the points.
Big surprise, you made another presumption (that I cheated and ignored a point). It couldn't at all be possible that in the mess of quoting you seven times that I incidentally missed something you said?
Oh pish posh, we all know you're above a minor clerical error.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

ATG is having way too much fun in this thread.
He is just happy that he gets a chance to use some smilies.
Aye, I can see him at home now, with his  smilies scepter, controlling his .gif army.

Edit: And I just saw the above post
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|7105|The Hague, Netherlands

now THIS is a debate

/takes 10 minutes off (mod duties and starts reading)
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7083

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Situations don't change, headlines do. If you can't find anything wrong with the world you aren't looking hard enough.
If you look hard enough you can see anything you wan't...
Love is the answer
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Situations don't change, headlines do. If you can't find anything wrong with the world you aren't looking hard enough.
If you look hard enough you can see anything you wan't...
I agree, but even if you have to look harder for something, it doesn't mean it wasn't there when you weren't looking for it. An environment doesn't change depending on how much information you have about it, the amount of information you have only effects how you respond to that environment.
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7056|Tampa Bay Florida
Ok, Flaming, I just want to say one more thing before Kmarion can deliver a knock out punch (hopefully)

You and I are both hypocrites.  We both know it.  We both know messed up shit is going on somewhere in this world, everyday, all the time. 

Do you ever wonder why veterans and victims of traumatic events have PTSD?  It's because they lived their life in a shell, to put it frankly.  Me and you, we have never known what it's like to be shot at, or to be in Manhattan on 9/11.  We live in a shell that society puts us in.  I think, if you truly realized how fucked up the world is, you would be insane.  Veterans of combat have seen what it's like.  They know we are, in the cosmic sense, pieces of meat walking around on this pointless Earth.  Our lives could be over without us even realizing it. 

So, in my opinion, there is only one way of maintaining your sanity -- deep down inside, you HAVE to hope things will get better.  Maniac, I think deep down inside, you hope things can get better too, like me.  But you think it's such a ridiculous possibility, you might as well not admit it to other people.  Because in your mind it's dumb.  But deep down, you think the same way I do.  Because if you didn't, if you TRULY knew how fucked up the world was, and there was no hope for change, you would've killed yourself already.  You wouldn't be here on these forums, chatting to people online while thousands and sometimes millions of people are dying in countries and lands we might've never even heard of.

Ever seen the movie or read the book "Children of Men"?  It's about the human race not being able to reproduce.  That is what the world would be like, if people truly knew, and not just aknowledged, how fucked up the world is.  They would commercially sell products which helped you commit suicide.

Although we're both hypocrites, maniac, we are not the lowest of the low.  People here in DST might have some pretty radical ideas, left and right, but NO ONE who posts at DST is as bad as the lowest form of life. 

You know what I'm talking about.  The people who don't vote.  The people who don't care about the world around them.  They are the lowest fucking scum on this earth.  Like the Iraq war or not, I sure as hell don't, I acknowledge that the Americans who died over there died in the name of my freedom to disagree wth the war.  So I'm going to vote, and try to make my world better.  Republicans do the same. 

That's all I gotta say.  I don't think anyone with an ounce of intelligence thinks this world is good, or even not bad.  This world fucking sucks.  All I did was point out a few subtle, maybe meaningless, hints that matter to me. 

Ok, Kmarion.  Let em have it.

Last edited by Spearhead (2008-02-23 13:51:21)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,988|6998|949

ATG wrote:

http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/4830/actorhx5.gif I think this thread demonstrates that mod arehttp://i18.tinypic.com/35lgd9u.gif people too.

It http://i1.tinypic.com/81gxpvp.gifalso negates my previously stated contention that sometimes mods hang their balls at the door ( in regards to stating opinions about issues ).http://i16.tinypic.com/35i18ic.gif


I will, with TLC to both parties refrain from smirking at the http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2901/beatingsn5.gif debate.
o.O

And LOL at Kmarion and FlamingManiac.  What I find amusing (and makes me LOL) is the ideas both of you are propagating/debating - the pointlessness of hope, inherent human morality/human nature, apathy towards the human condition, the idea of Dunbar's number and the implications, etc - are philosophical ideas I understand best when talked about in that context (as an idea/thought).

Elitism isn't that you believe your ideals to be right, it's the idea that you are better than someone because they don't agree with you.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

There is the same chance of human rights violations around the world, there is the same chance of a genocide around the world, there is the same chance that there is an oppressed group of people around the world. If we both take a 1000 year slice of history, you believe (not to put words in your mouth) that there are ups and downs in that time period, I believe that every bad event had the same likelihood of happening as a good event at that period, it is just a matter of a roll of the dice. Nothing fundamentally changes about the dice just because different numbers come up at different times.
I don't really think you can equate human nature to a roll of dice, or make a general comparative analyzation of the past 1000 years.  The idea of a global community (which we are moving towards and have been for at least 100 years) is evidence that what would happen 1000 years ago wouldn't necessarily be able to happen now.  As long as we as humans analyze and learn from history, we can positively create change in the global community.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-02-23 15:37:04)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
Ahem...4 karmas from four mods in 24 hours.

Some sorta site record there. Thanks gents.https://i18.tinypic.com/7xxoumq.gif
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|7056|Tampa Bay Florida

ATG wrote:

Ahem...4 karmas from four mods in 24 hours.

Some sorta site record there. Thanks gents.http://i18.tinypic.com/7xxoumq.gif
Its probably cuz their happy someone is finally using all the emoticons they uploaded to the forums (or nvm, I guess you're linking them to another site?  Didnt know you could do that)

Last edited by Spearhead (2008-02-23 14:08:55)

ATG
Banned
+5,233|6896|Global Command
It's me own private collection.
0akleaves
Member
+183|6980|Newcastle UK
from what you mentioned great but none of it really effects me, the things in matter to me have gone worse or things have came to my attention are bad news not good.
You have to learn the rules of the game and then you have to play better than anyone else.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6967|132 and Bush

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Flatter myself? But my mind is a beautiful diamond. sad

You cannot find flaws in someone's opinion standing on its own, you can only find flaws between what you thought their opinion is and what their opinion actually is. At worst this is unexpected, but this is perfectly in line with the rest of my ideals. Thinking you know what someone's general line of thought is being quite presumptuous yourself.
Just because you are hard headed it doesn't mean you have a diamond in there. When people show a trend of expressing themselves in the same manner then you can get an idea of their general line of thought. Passing judgment on their emotions is entirely different.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Extremes give way to clarity? In my experience they twist the truth.
It is what I said it was. Somehow this made you get defensive.


Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Yes, these specific incidences get me riled up, but everyone has particular subjects they get all touchy over.
Obviously.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

As I said it does trigger emotions, but to be so blatant as to say you can relate to the situation is truly degrading. Unchecked emotional responses are utterly meaningless in a rational world, so you better actually mean what you say when you open your trap about caring for someone.
Some people do relate. Some people just understand. One does not excluded the other. There is nothing degrading or insulting about expressing sympathy.

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

But if I do pursue that path I won't be as happy as if I pursued your life path, right?
Nice try, it's your path to choose. "... individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life."

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

But as a whole, DAST is only controlled arguing, I don't see any action being taken. Nothing is wrong with just agreeing with someone or expanding on their ideas, but as a whole DAST is a news service and arguing for the sake of arguing. Not that I think there is anything wrong with that, obviously.
Despite popular belief disagreement is not a mandate for discussion here. Although it appears some people, like yourself, believe it is. There are topics where we have had a consensus.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

Oh pish posh, we all know you're above a minor clerical error.
Only one of us here pretends to be impervious to flaws... Diamond boy..lol .

PS: lol'ing @ all the guys here that are like: "oooh this is a debate" or "you don't see this side of Kmarion". I'm sitting here typing all these reply's with a smile on my face... Drama queens..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Flaming_Maniac
prince of insufficient light
+2,490|7073|67.222.138.85

Spearhead wrote:

Ok, Flaming, I just want to say one more thing before Kmarion can deliver a knock out punch (hopefully)

You and I are both hypocrites.  We both know it.  We both know messed up shit is going on somewhere in this world, everyday, all the time.
Really? I know there is messed up shit going on, but my point is I don't care. I can't care.

Spearhead wrote:

Do you ever wonder why veterans and victims of traumatic events have PTSD?  It's because they lived their life in a shell, to put it frankly.  Me and you, we have never known what it's like to be shot at, or to be in Manhattan on 9/11.  We live in a shell that society puts us in.  I think, if you truly realized how fucked up the world is, you would be insane.  Veterans of combat have seen what it's like.  They know we are, in the cosmic sense, pieces of meat walking around on this pointless Earth.  Our lives could be over without us even realizing it. 

So, in my opinion, there is only one way of maintaining your sanity -- deep down inside, you HAVE to hope things will get better.  Maniac, I think deep down inside, you hope things can get better too, like me.  But you think it's such a ridiculous possibility, you might as well not admit it to other people.  Because in your mind it's dumb.  But deep down, you think the same way I do.  Because if you didn't, if you TRULY knew how
fucked up the world was, and there was no hope for change, you would've killed yourself already.  You wouldn't be here on these forums, chatting to people online while thousands and sometimes millions of people are dying in countries and lands we might've never even heard of.
I only maintain that I can make the world better, if for no one else but myself. I hold no hope that someone else is going to make life better for me or anyone else out without any ulterior motives.

I can't say on an emotional level I feel the pain of everyone in the world or some crap like that, but I think I have a pretty good feel of it on an abstract level. One of my strengths (or weaknesses) is to step back and look at the big picture, and when you do that a whole lot of stuff gets pointless real quick.

As it is though, the difference between you and me is the reason you don't go bat crazy is because you hope that some day things won't suck, and I just don't care that things suck because they don't suck for me. My outlook is very selfish, but if you look at the human race as a whole, and it's history, I just can't look at it any other way. The past just doesn't give any reasonable signs that things will get better for the human race as a whole. With that in mind, I just can't feel responsible for every bad thing that happens in the world, and if I can't do something about every single of them I'm not going to do it for any of them. I will work for what directly effects me, my family, the competent people in my life, and my country, and after that no one is getting any of me. It's just different ways of going about life, that's all there is to it.

Spearhead wrote:

Ever seen the movie or read the book "Children of Men"?  It's about the human race not being able to reproduce.  That is what the world would be like, if people truly knew, and not just aknowledged, how fucked up the world is.  They would commercially sell products which helped you commit suicide.
Advocate of assisted suicide.

Spearhead wrote:

Although we're both hypocrites, maniac, we are not the lowest of the low.  People here in DST might have some pretty radical ideas, left and right, but NO ONE who posts at DST is as bad as the lowest form of life. 

You know what I'm talking about.  The people who don't vote.  The people who don't care about the world around them.  They are the lowest fucking scum on this earth.  Like the Iraq war or not, I sure as hell don't, I acknowledge that the Americans who died over there died in the name of my freedom to disagree wth the war.  So I'm going to vote, and try to make my world better.  Republicans do the same.
Agreed, especially on the voting part.

Spearhead wrote:

That's all I gotta say.  I don't think anyone with an ounce of intelligence thinks this world is good, or even not bad.
I think people are neither good nor bad, that in a societal sense they are evil. They will always look out for themselves and no one else, unless helping someone else helps them.

Spearhead wrote:

This world fucking sucks.  All I did was point out a few subtle, maybe meaningless, hints that matter to me.
Sorry to rain on your parade.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

And LOL at Kmarion and FlamingManiac.  What I find amusing (and makes me LOL) is the ideas both of you are propagating/debating - the pointlessness of hope, inherent human morality/human nature, apathy towards the human condition, the idea of Dunbar's number and the implications, etc - are philosophical ideas I understand best when talked about in that context (as an idea/thought).
I'm confused, what is "that context"?

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

There is the same chance of human rights violations around the world, there is the same chance of a genocide around the world, there is the same chance that there is an oppressed group of people around the world. If we both take a 1000 year slice of history, you believe (not to put words in your mouth) that there are ups and downs in that time period, I believe that every bad event had the same likelihood of happening as a good event at that period, it is just a matter of a roll of the dice. Nothing fundamentally changes about the dice just because different numbers come up at different times.
I don't really think you can equate human nature to a roll of dice, or make a general comparative analyzation of the past 1000 years.  The idea of a global community (which we are moving towards and have been for at least 100 years) is evidence that what would happen 1000 years ago wouldn't necessarily be able to happen now.  As long as we as humans analyze and learn from history, we can positively create change in the global community.
Ah you're right, we could kill people wayyyyyy better in the 20th century than we could in preceding centuries.

We are making leaps and bounds in concerns to technological advances, infrastructure advances, and advances in societal structure, but the basic building block, the human, has changed very little. There will always be people trying to pull humanity up, and those trying to tear it down, there is no getting away from that fact. I mean, do you really think there will never be a horrific event bigger than the Holocaust?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Flatter myself? But my mind is a beautiful diamond. sad

You cannot find flaws in someone's opinion standing on its own, you can only find flaws between what you thought their opinion is and what their opinion actually is. At worst this is unexpected, but this is perfectly in line with the rest of my ideals. Thinking you know what someone's general line of thought is being quite presumptuous yourself.
Just because you are hard headed it doesn't mean you have a diamond in there. When people show a trend of expressing themselves in the same manner then you can get an idea of their general line of thought. Passing judgment on their emotions is entirely different.
An idea of the general line of thought, but to assume posts that you deem out of character are inconsistent (short of CyrusTheVirus style posts) is silly. One of the many reasons party lines are abominable.

I don't pass judgments on emotions, I pass judgments on actions.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Extremes give way to clarity? In my experience they twist the truth.
It is what I said it was. Somehow this made you get defensive.
Then yes, from the perspective of all of humanity, the Holocaust was an unavoidable, logical outcome. It was going to happen to somebody, somewhere, and it happened to be the Jews in Germany.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

Yes, these specific incidences get me riled up, but everyone has particular subjects they get all touchy over.
Obviously.
You don't have any?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

As I said it does trigger emotions, but to be so blatant as to say you can relate to the situation is truly degrading. Unchecked emotional responses are utterly meaningless in a rational world, so you better actually mean what you say when you open your trap about caring for someone.
Some people do relate. Some people just understand. One does not excluded the other. There is nothing degrading or insulting about expressing sympathy.
There is in expressing fake sympathy. I will only concede some people are better at faking being able to relate and understand that they believe it themselves.

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

But if I do pursue that path I won't be as happy as if I pursued your life path, right?
Nice try, it's your path to choose. "... individuals follow their own paths and react differently to things in life."

Kmarion wrote:

I actually made a conscious effort to change that behavior in my life. Yes, it will make you happier.
So it's my path to choose, but yours is better?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac wrote:

But as a whole, DAST is only controlled arguing, I don't see any action being taken. Nothing is wrong with just agreeing with someone or expanding on their ideas, but as a whole DAST is a news service and arguing for the sake of arguing. Not that I think there is anything wrong with that, obviously.
Despite popular belief disagreement is not a mandate for discussion here. Although it appears some people, like yourself, believe it is. There are topics where we have had a consensus.
But what is there to talk about when everyone agrees? I can't think of any actual debate threads that are completely one sided, only some news threads, and I highly doubt any of them are particularly interesting past the OP.

Really, what is the point when you truly agree with everyone else? You just sit around, patting each other on the back?

Kmarion wrote:

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

Oh pish posh, we all know you're above a minor clerical error.
Only one of us here pretends to be impervious to flaws... Diamond boy..lol .
https://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g44/Flaming_Maniac/diamond.jpg

Edit:

Kmarion wrote:

PS: lol'ing @ all the guys here that are like: "oooh this is a debate" or "you don't see this side of Kmarion". I'm sitting here typing all these reply's with a smile on my face... Drama queens..lol
Agreed, this is fun, and in good humor. I know of a couple pairs of members who could take that to heart...

And well damn these posts are getting long, I'm going to start double posting.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6967|132 and Bush

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

I don't pass judgments on emotions, I pass judgments on actions.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

Nothing pisses me off more than when someone hears a story about a brutal murder or rape and acts all sad about it.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

An idea of the general line of thought, but to assume posts that you deem out of character are inconsistent (short of CyrusTheVirus style posts) is silly. One of the many reasons party lines are abominable.
I don't label people on party lines. I get impressions from an individuals post history. Clearly you are arguing for the sake of arguing now... and that's the only silly thing here.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

Then yes, from the perspective of all of humanity, the Holocaust was an unavoidable, logical outcome. It was going to happen to somebody, somewhere, and it happened to be the Jews in Germany.
Point? Your contention was that because I picked the holocaust as an example because I was trying label you antisemitic.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

You don't have any?
Of course I do. Like the people who presume to know how a person truly feels about a situation.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

There is in expressing fake sympathy. I will only concede some people are better at faking being able to relate and understand that they believe it themselves.
True, especially in politics. But your claim isn't that people are faking, at least not originally. You are now desperately twisting the discussion and back tracking. You said that people shouldn't feel better because there are some kids starving in Darfur. Just because someone isn't looking for things to be depressed about it doesn't make them a fake.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

So it's my path to choose, but yours is better?
lol@ your feeble attempts to set me up. I've answered this.

Flaming_Maniac  wrote:

But what is there to talk about when everyone agrees? I can't think of any actual debate threads that are completely one sided, only some news threads, and I highly doubt any of them are particularly interesting past the OP.

Really, what is the point when you truly agree with everyone else? You just sit around, patting each other on the back?
An open discussion about an event does not have to be confrontational. If it comes down to just a bunch of kids making a debate for the hell of it (probably so they can pat themselves on the back) I usually abstain. It's boring to be honest. Kinda like the way I am feeling now.
Xbone Stormsurgezz

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard