doc. josh
Member
+48|6561

S.Lythberg wrote:

looks nice, and it will make things safer, not having tons of explosives on board.

too bad naval warfare is in its dying days...
Sweet Now the us can build an X-303 and go fight the Gou'ld lol
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6617|132 and Bush

Xbone Stormsurgezz
Vilham
Say wat!?
+580|6783|UK
Like normal, you wouldnt want to be hit by a 5 inch shell, however this one wont explode on the ship, thus hopefully saving many lives for the sailers onboard.
MAGUIRE93
High Angle Hell
+182|6211|Schofield Barracks
just imagine a huge ship with tons of those all fireing at onnce
they would turn enemy ships into metal cheese
Home
Section.80
+447|6864|Seattle, Washington, USA

Jumpstart the arms race.
GunSlinger OIF II
Banned.
+1,860|6660
when did it ever stop?
Skorpy-chan
Member
+127|6362|Twyford, UK

Vilham wrote:

Like normal, you wouldnt want to be hit by a 5 inch shell, however this one wont explode on the ship, thus hopefully saving many lives for the sailers onboard.
It won't explode on the ship it's FIRED from, but a carbon-coated metal slug at hypersonic speeds does a LOT of exploding on impact.

EDIT:

Sgt.Davi wrote:

If History taught you anything its that anything is possible despite the odds, such as, co incidentaly, Midway.
The odds were in favour of the US. Less ships, but better ones, and better aircraft, better intelligence, better strategy, and far better encryption. The Japanese had only won up until then because of surprise.

Last edited by Skorpy-chan (2008-02-01 21:30:38)

gene_pool
Banned
+519|6638|Gold coast, Aus.
lol humanity.
Locoloki
I got Mug 222 at Gritty's!!!!
+216|6657|Your moms bedroom
how accurate can a 7 lb projectile be from 200 miles out?
KuSTaV
noice
+947|6528|Gold Coast

Locoloki wrote:

how accurate can a 7 lb projectile be from 200 miles out?
Who cares. Its small, goes fast and far. Its awesome.
noice                                                                                                        https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/awsmsanta.png
David.P
Banned
+649|6290

KuSTaV wrote:

Locoloki wrote:

how accurate can a 7 lb projectile be from 200 miles out?
Who cares. Its small, goes fast and far. Its awesome.
And it can cause massive casualties ans maximum carnage in a lesser amount of time than anything else! God i want one.
henno13
A generally unremarkable member
+230|6365|Belfast

Kmarion wrote:

Damn!

rape rape rape rape rape rape
InfectiousShadow
BF2S Resident Bass Player
+45|6448|Washington State, USA
im just thinking mass effect with all those miniturized rail guns in little hand guns.
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6124|Birmingham, UK

HurricaИe wrote:

Suck on that China/Russia/Iran
Yeah you go girl.

Anyways, i agree with that guy that said naval warfare is dying, modern day warfare is about stealth, and, hiding an aircraft carrier behind a rock won't do the trick.

RAF ftw.
Ruckel
Ruckel for all!
+43|6192|sverige

GunSlinger OIF II wrote:

now russia is gonna make one
and a better one.
some_random_panda
Flamesuit essential
+454|6407

HurricaИe wrote:

Suck on that China/Russia/Iran
You really think China and Russia aren't going to make one as well?
SEREVENT
MASSIVE G STAR
+605|6124|Birmingham, UK

some_random_panda wrote:

HurricaИe wrote:

Suck on that China/Russia/Iran
You really think China and Russia aren't going to make one as well?
I want one too then.
wah1188
You orrible caaaaaaan't
+321|6477|UK
I thought it just shoots some metal out how come it explodes and stuff?
Its pretty cool because the projectiles will be cheaper.
elbekko
Your lord and master
+36|6418|Leuven, Belgium
Old. Seen that vid a couple of months ago.

But still fancy.
Magpie
international welder....Douchebag Dude, <3 ur mom
+257|6543|Milkystania, yurop
meeeh boobs are better and allot more safer

Last edited by Magpie (2008-02-02 03:50:59)

jord
Member
+2,382|6695|The North, beyond the wall.
Pretty cool, but then again, so was the Comanche.

Is it really worth the billions it will cost to make? As said by someone else, Naval warfare is getting less and less of a possibility.

Nice find.
Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6598|SE London

jord wrote:

Pretty cool, but then again, so was the Comanche.

Is it really worth the billions it will cost to make? As said by someone else, Naval warfare is getting less and less of a possibility.

Nice find.
We're the ones making it. It's built by BAE.
jord
Member
+2,382|6695|The North, beyond the wall.

Bertster7 wrote:

jord wrote:

Pretty cool, but then again, so was the Comanche.

Is it really worth the billions it will cost to make? As said by someone else, Naval warfare is getting less and less of a possibility.

Nice find.
We're the ones making it. It's built by BAE.
We paying for it as well?

Also thanks for info, didn't think we made it.

Last edited by jord (2008-02-02 04:48:07)

Bertster7
Confused Pothead
+1,101|6598|SE London

jord wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

jord wrote:

Pretty cool, but then again, so was the Comanche.

Is it really worth the billions it will cost to make? As said by someone else, Naval warfare is getting less and less of a possibility.

Nice find.
We're the ones making it. It's built by BAE.
We paying for it as well?

Also thanks for info, didn't think we made it.
Nope. We're not buying it. Just made by a British company. The Americans are paying us loads for it.
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6638|London, England
Strange. You'd think that they'd make it themselves with the huge defence industry they have and their whole ethos of making their own shit when it comes to defence. Especially on a big piece of kit like this.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard