Intel Core 2 Quad 9300 9450

2008-01-25 02:35:53

#1

Slayer: ---hates you; +1,137|6765|Hell, p.o box 666

well looking for a new CPU in the near future... I´ve noticed the above mentioned CPU´s yesterday in alternate.de shop? Those arent aviable yet and I havent found anything about those thingys so far.

Anybody got an idea how those perform etc etc?

2008-01-25 02:48:34

#2

T.Pike: 99 Problems . . .; +187|6291|Pennsyltucky

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20 … t-ces.html

2008-01-25 03:00:17

#3

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|6819|Nårvei

Unless you need Quad me think its better to buy a faster better Duo - in your case seing as money is not an issue buy one of each and compare them yourself

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2008-01-25 04:10:04

#4

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6630|London, England

Varegg wrote:
in your case seing as money is not an issue buy one of each and compare them yourself

Yeah!!

2008-01-25 05:18:37

#5

Scratch[USA]: Member; +105|6556

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/sho … ight=q9450

This review says the 9450 beats the Q6600 only on power consumption, heat, and cache size.
Just a quick scan I am sure there is more information somewhere

2008-01-25 05:59:50

#6

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6206|Winland

I wish I had as much money as you

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2008-01-25 06:03:37

#7

Zimmer: Un Moderador; +1,688|6765|Scotland

Scratch[USA] wrote:
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=173287&page=2&highlight=q9450

This review says the 9450 beats the Q6600 only on power consumption, heat, and cache size.
Just a quick scan I am sure there is more information somewhere

Cache size then means faster CPU load on certain CPU unfriendly programs. Not games, but like PS and shit.

Quad Core > Dual Core

You just have to pick carefully.

2008-01-28 00:33:43

#8

Slayer: ---hates you; +1,137|6765|Hell, p.o box 666

the 9450 is a quad right?!

Well, let´s wait until those CPU´s are aviable... The 9300 series seems pretty good overall price/performance.

2008-01-28 02:28:46

#9

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6462|The Twilight Zone

Same a s Slayer, looking for a new proc. Is it better to buy a E8400 and a 780i mobo or a Q9300 and a 750i mobo? Don't want to spend too much.

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2008-01-28 02:32:43

#10

DUnlimited: got any popo lolo intersting?; +1,160|6472|cuntshitlake

E8400 and OC to >4GHz ------> Win.

It's a dual core though.

Depends on the use. For gaming Quad cores aren't THAT much worth it at the moment, but for more a future-proof machine quad is more of a must.

Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2008-01-28 02:34:48)

main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg

2008-01-28 02:36:26

#11

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6462|The Twilight Zone

I need it for games nothing else. So C2D FTW right? I agree, its cheap and if i need something more powerful the next year, i just upgrade, its cheap anyway, money well spend.

2008-01-28 03:26:35

#12

Slayer: ---hates you; +1,137|6765|Hell, p.o box 666

just ordered a E8400, will go for those quad thingy later, maybe...

2008-01-28 03:32:05

#13

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6462|The Twilight Zone

Slayer wrote:
just ordered a E8400, will go for those quad thingy later, maybe...

Nice! What mobo you have Slayi?

2008-01-28 03:50:46

#14

Slayer: ---hates you; +1,137|6765|Hell, p.o box 666

I got an Asus, wait, eh, P5N32-SLI Nforce 650-SLI... I hope this MoBo supports the new CPUs... Otherwise I´ll go for the newer P5ND Nforce750... At least I think so

BF2S Forums Intel Core 2 Quad 9300 9450

Varegg wrote:

Scratch[USA] wrote:

Slayer wrote:

Board footer