I know someone who has lots of Molotovs cheap if any of you want them.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Does he need a sharp catchy logo? I got just the ticket:Spark wrote:
I know someone who has lots of Molotovs cheap if any of you want them.
Fuck you all. And fuck you ATG that was not the point. Close the fucking thread. Fucking cunts.
SUCCIENT BABY!!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
No worry mods, don't do anything.
My title is no different from all of "the US did this" and" the US did that" thread titles on this forum. Never not once did I take them as meaning to include every citizen.paranoid101 wrote:
I should add that what you posted made me feel angry, but at least you have gone some to ways to explain where your coming from.
I have stated before and I will state again. I have a deep respect for the citizens of GB. Your countrymen alone stood in direct defiance to the expanding Third Reich. denying them England. No other country in Europe can say that. Everone else either surrendered to or appeased Hitler. I do not count Russia since Russia colaborated with Germany early on.
I am pissed off that your country would take such an attitude toward the OP. It smacks of PC and appeasement for fear of making the Muslim community angry and starting trouble. ANd why would they be worriedcartoons about that I wonder? There is no other reason to do this.
I also donated an obscene amount. I am also invenerable to tha mod POWA!.......just like youusmarine2005 wrote:
No worry mods, don't do anything.
Friends 4 eva?
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
That article is so confusing. I'd think of 'anti-Islamic activity' as a bunch of rednecks burning down a mosque before considering a bunch of radical Muslims blowing people up.
well, ya got me with it..ghettoperson wrote:
Heh, I threw that in cause I know how much you love it when people toss the word around however my second point is rather valid.lowing wrote:
lol.....bigotry....c'mon ghetto, not you to.ghettoperson wrote:
I really can't be fucked to read 7 pages of bigotry, but do we have a source for this that isn't well known to make entire stories up because they're nazi's and need to fill a newspaper?
Well I also think them "the US did this" and" the US did that" threads are bullshit also, I don't bother posting in them because its not my country and Im sure theres enough US people on here to defend them, get them changed or deleted, I am just doing the same with your thread (defending that is)lowing wrote:
My title is no different from all of "the US did this" and" the US did that" thread titles on this forum. Never not once did I take them as meaning to include every citizen.paranoid101 wrote:
I should add that what you posted made me feel angry, but at least you have gone some to ways to explain where your coming from.
I have stated before and I will state again. I have a deep respect for the citizens of GB. Your countrymen alone stood in direct defiance to the expanding Third Reich. denying them England. No other country in Europe can say that. Everone else either surrendered to or appeased Hitler. I do not count Russia since Russia colaborated with Germany early on.
I am pissed off that your country would take such an attitude toward the OP. It smacks of PC and appeasement for fear of making the Muslim community angry and starting trouble. ANd why would they be worriedcartoons about that I wonder? There is no other reason to do this.
But if you don't like the US bashing one, then why do a British one? Tit for Tat, get your own back? is that the only reason for your thread?
And I didn't realize that if you didn't agree with the title of a post, you couldn't comment on it, now if I didn't post then you could probably say I was being PC about it and not wanting to upset or anger you, but I know your against that type of thing, so I guess I can say what I want about it.
Last edited by paranoid101 (2008-01-19 17:55:04)
No, I do not care if someone wants to post US bashing threads. I am not insulted by them.paranoid101 wrote:
Well I also think them "the US did this" and" the US did that" threads are bullshit also, I don't bother posting in them because its not my country and Im sure theres enough US people on here to defend them, get them changed or deleted, I am just doing the same with your thread (defending that is)lowing wrote:
My title is no different from all of "the US did this" and" the US did that" thread titles on this forum. Never not once did I take them as meaning to include every citizen.paranoid101 wrote:
I should add that what you posted made me feel angry, but at least you have gone some to ways to explain where your coming from.
I have stated before and I will state again. I have a deep respect for the citizens of GB. Your countrymen alone stood in direct defiance to the expanding Third Reich. denying them England. No other country in Europe can say that. Everone else either surrendered to or appeased Hitler. I do not count Russia since Russia colaborated with Germany early on.
I am pissed off that your country would take such an attitude toward the OP. It smacks of PC and appeasement for fear of making the Muslim community angry and starting trouble. ANd why would they be worriedcartoons about that I wonder? There is no other reason to do this.
But if you don't like the US bashing one, then why do a British one? Tit for Tat, get your own back? is that the only reason for your thread?
And I didn't realize that if you didn't agree with the title of a post, you couldn't comment on it, now if I didn't post then you could probably say I was being PC about it and not wanting to upset or anger you, but I know your against that type of thing, so I guess I can say what I want about it.
On the contrary, I especially want people to post that disagree with me. How boring would it be if I couldn't get anyone to disagree?
Not being a smart ass. But it's probably because you're used to them, there's like 3 a day.lowing wrote:
No, I do not care if someone wants to post US bashing threads. I am not insulted by them.paranoid101 wrote:
Well I also think them "the US did this" and" the US did that" threads are bullshit also, I don't bother posting in them because its not my country and Im sure theres enough US people on here to defend them, get them changed or deleted, I am just doing the same with your thread (defending that is)lowing wrote:
My title is no different from all of "the US did this" and" the US did that" thread titles on this forum. Never not once did I take them as meaning to include every citizen.
I have stated before and I will state again. I have a deep respect for the citizens of GB. Your countrymen alone stood in direct defiance to the expanding Third Reich. denying them England. No other country in Europe can say that. Everone else either surrendered to or appeased Hitler. I do not count Russia since Russia colaborated with Germany early on.
I am pissed off that your country would take such an attitude toward the OP. It smacks of PC and appeasement for fear of making the Muslim community angry and starting trouble. ANd why would they be worriedcartoons about that I wonder? There is no other reason to do this.
But if you don't like the US bashing one, then why do a British one? Tit for Tat, get your own back? is that the only reason for your thread?
And I didn't realize that if you didn't agree with the title of a post, you couldn't comment on it, now if I didn't post then you could probably say I was being PC about it and not wanting to upset or anger you, but I know your against that type of thing, so I guess I can say what I want about it.
On the contrary, I especially want people to post that disagree with me. How boring would it be if I couldn't get anyone to disagree?
LOL, yeah ya may be on to somethin' there.jord wrote:
Not being a smart ass. But it's probably because you're used to them, there's like 3 a day.lowing wrote:
No, I do not care if someone wants to post US bashing threads. I am not insulted by them.paranoid101 wrote:
Well I also think them "the US did this" and" the US did that" threads are bullshit also, I don't bother posting in them because its not my country and Im sure theres enough US people on here to defend them, get them changed or deleted, I am just doing the same with your thread (defending that is)
But if you don't like the US bashing one, then why do a British one? Tit for Tat, get your own back? is that the only reason for your thread?
And I didn't realize that if you didn't agree with the title of a post, you couldn't comment on it, now if I didn't post then you could probably say I was being PC about it and not wanting to upset or anger you, but I know your against that type of thing, so I guess I can say what I want about it.
On the contrary, I especially want people to post that disagree with me. How boring would it be if I couldn't get anyone to disagree?
Yep that why the section is called Debate and Serious Talk and I agree it would be boring if you couldn't get anyone to disagree, but you do need the debate part, you can't just stick to your guns, never taking anybodys else's opinion onboard, just making smart remakes trying to belittle the other poster's (not saying you do this, but it does happen on here alot).lowing wrote:
LOL, yeah ya may be on to somethin' there.jord wrote:
Not being a smart ass. But it's probably because you're used to them, there's like 3 a day.lowing wrote:
No, I do not care if someone wants to post US bashing threads. I am not insulted by them.
On the contrary, I especially want people to post that disagree with me. How boring would it be if I couldn't get anyone to disagree?
But if its just going to turn into this is my opinion and I don't care what anybody else thinks, then it defeats the purpose of this forum.
Edit: while you might not care that someone bash your country in threads, I do but does this make me any right for caring than you not?
Last edited by paranoid101 (2008-01-19 18:27:14)
I listen to others opinions, that is why I respond to them. A lot of people on here equate not agreeing with not listening. There is a difference.paranoid101 wrote:
Yep that why the section is called Debate and Serious Talk and I agree it would be boring if you couldn't get anyone to disagree, but you do need the debate part, you can't just stick to your guns, never taking anybodys else's opinion onboard, just making smart remakes trying to belittle the other poster's (not saying you do this, but it does happen on here alot).lowing wrote:
LOL, yeah ya may be on to somethin' there.jord wrote:
Not being a smart ass. But it's probably because you're used to them, there's like 3 a day.
But if its just going to turn into this is my opinion and I don't care what anybody else thinks, then it defeats the purpose of this forum.
Edit: while you might not care that someone bash your country in threads, I do but does this make me any right for caring than you not?
Me and Cam, go round and round about all kindsa shit, I hardly ever agree with him, but I do read what he posts and understand what he is saying. Honestly I think I am one of the most hated personalities on this forum along with David P I think. My beliefs catch 20 kinds of hell, and quite frankly, I wouldn't change a thing. I believe what I believe, and I do not sugar coat it.
2 things I can not be accused of in this forum
a. Politically Correct
b. inconsistency
Oh no, I hate David P far more than you. Although he has been better of late. I rather like you really, as I would say do the large majority of regulars, even if we can't agree on anything.lowing wrote:
I listen to others opinions, that is why I respond to them. A lot of people on here equate not agreeing with not listening. There is a difference.paranoid101 wrote:
Yep that why the section is called Debate and Serious Talk and I agree it would be boring if you couldn't get anyone to disagree, but you do need the debate part, you can't just stick to your guns, never taking anybodys else's opinion onboard, just making smart remakes trying to belittle the other poster's (not saying you do this, but it does happen on here alot).lowing wrote:
LOL, yeah ya may be on to somethin' there.
But if its just going to turn into this is my opinion and I don't care what anybody else thinks, then it defeats the purpose of this forum.
Edit: while you might not care that someone bash your country in threads, I do but does this make me any right for caring than you not?
Me and Cam, go round and round about all kindsa shit, I hardly ever agree with him, but I do read what he posts and understand what he is saying. Honestly I think I am one of the most hated personalities on this forum along with David P I think. My beliefs catch 20 kinds of hell, and quite frankly, I wouldn't change a thing. I believe what I believe, and I do not sugar coat it.
2 things I can not be accused of in this forum
a. Politically Correct
b. inconsistency
I bet you agree with me, you just can't say it in public or the mods will strip you of your karma points or something.ghettoperson wrote:
Oh no, I hate David P far more than you. Although he has been better of late. I rather like you really, as I would say do the large majority of regulars, even if we can't agree on anything.lowing wrote:
I listen to others opinions, that is why I respond to them. A lot of people on here equate not agreeing with not listening. There is a difference.paranoid101 wrote:
Yep that why the section is called Debate and Serious Talk and I agree it would be boring if you couldn't get anyone to disagree, but you do need the debate part, you can't just stick to your guns, never taking anybodys else's opinion onboard, just making smart remakes trying to belittle the other poster's (not saying you do this, but it does happen on here alot).
But if its just going to turn into this is my opinion and I don't care what anybody else thinks, then it defeats the purpose of this forum.
Edit: while you might not care that someone bash your country in threads, I do but does this make me any right for caring than you not?
Me and Cam, go round and round about all kindsa shit, I hardly ever agree with him, but I do read what he posts and understand what he is saying. Honestly I think I am one of the most hated personalities on this forum along with David P I think. My beliefs catch 20 kinds of hell, and quite frankly, I wouldn't change a thing. I believe what I believe, and I do not sugar coat it.
2 things I can not be accused of in this forum
a. Politically Correct
b. inconsistency
Heh
Its from the Daily Mail don't believe it.
Bottom line:
Calling it 'Islamic Terrorism' puts the wrong idea in people's heads because a) it's unIslamic and b) only a tiny tiny percentage of so-called Muslims engage in it. It's like talking about a 'Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World' just because a small number of very rich jews pay off politicians thereby bypassing the democratic process.
Calling it 'Islamic Terrorism' puts the wrong idea in people's heads because a) it's unIslamic and b) only a tiny tiny percentage of so-called Muslims engage in it. It's like talking about a 'Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World' just because a small number of very rich jews pay off politicians thereby bypassing the democratic process.
Exactly, we can safely say lowing has no clue about TACTICS.CameronPoe wrote:
Bottom line:
Calling it 'Islamic Terrorism' puts the wrong idea in people's heads because a) it's unIslamic and b) only a tiny tiny percentage of so-called Muslims engage in it. It's like talking about a 'Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World' just because a small number of very rich jews pay off politicians thereby bypassing the democratic process.
As soon as the "Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World". Affects polical elections, global economies and changes global history, then we will label them accordingly and give them all the attention they are begging for.CameronPoe wrote:
Bottom line:
Calling it 'Islamic Terrorism' puts the wrong idea in people's heads because a) it's unIslamic and b) only a tiny tiny percentage of so-called Muslims engage in it. It's like talking about a 'Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World' just because a small number of very rich jews pay off politicians thereby bypassing the democratic process.
It is Islamic Terrorism because it is Islamic Terrorists we are at war with.... Get on the truth band wagon.
It's not bigotry. It's Educated Hate.ghettoperson wrote:
I really can't be fucked to read 7 pages of bigotry, but do we have a source for this that isn't well known to make entire stories up because they're nazi's and need to fill a newspaper?
yeah, I guess burying the truth along side your heads in the sand is one form of "tactic"Vilham wrote:
Exactly, we can safely say lowing has no clue about TACTICS.CameronPoe wrote:
Bottom line:
Calling it 'Islamic Terrorism' puts the wrong idea in people's heads because a) it's unIslamic and b) only a tiny tiny percentage of so-called Muslims engage in it. It's like talking about a 'Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World' just because a small number of very rich jews pay off politicians thereby bypassing the democratic process.
Fair enough, I also enjoy reading your posts, this one touched a nerve as you can tell, still I haven't been posted for a while so at least it go me back involved.lowing wrote:
I listen to others opinions, that is why I respond to them. A lot of people on here equate not agreeing with not listening. There is a difference.paranoid101 wrote:
Yep that why the section is called Debate and Serious Talk and I agree it would be boring if you couldn't get anyone to disagree, but you do need the debate part, you can't just stick to your guns, never taking anybodys else's opinion onboard, just making smart remakes trying to belittle the other poster's (not saying you do this, but it does happen on here alot).lowing wrote:
LOL, yeah ya may be on to somethin' there.
But if its just going to turn into this is my opinion and I don't care what anybody else thinks, then it defeats the purpose of this forum.
Edit: while you might not care that someone bash your country in threads, I do but does this make me any right for caring than you not?
Me and Cam, go round and round about all kindsa shit, I hardly ever agree with him, but I do read what he posts and understand what he is saying. Honestly I think I am one of the most hated personalities on this forum along with David P I think. My beliefs catch 20 kinds of hell, and quite frankly, I wouldn't change a thing. I believe what I believe, and I do not sugar coat it.
2 things I can not be accused of in this forum
a. Politically Correct
b. inconsistency
As for hating people on here well I dare say it goes on, but not from me its a it silly to hate someone you will probably never meet and really know nothing about, now don't get me wrong I don't like some of the stuff posted in this forum, but at least in your views you are willing to give a reason, not just writing drivel or ranting ( the virtual sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting Nar Nar Nar over an over again)
I still think this thread of yours was designed to get a certain reaction (which it got) and was going to become an argument thread, but at least you man of his convictions, not that you care but you can have my respect for that, but I can't give you the same for this post.
Anyway its my Bedtime, Goodnight Lowing
Probably 'un-islamic' would be more accurate.
PS Its Catholic terrorism you need to look out for:
PS Its Catholic terrorism you need to look out for:
Fuck Israel
This so-called "Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World" already affects elections in the US, has led to a state of Israel in the middle of a load of Arabs who didn't want it, makes or breaks companies and small countries on stock exchanges and directs billions of US tax dollars into weaponry with which to dispatch Arabs and build homes on their land...lowing wrote:
As soon as the "Jewish Conspiracy to Take Over The World". Affects polical elections, global economies and changes global history, then we will label them accordingly and give them all the attention they are begging for.
It is Islamic Terrorism because it is Islamic Terrorists we are at war with.... Get on the truth band wagon.
We're going to have to agree to disagree. I don't regard those animals as Muslims because they're not following Islamic law. I also believe that their cause has as much to do with supposed Islam as it does to do with anti-globalisation. It's as political as it is supposed to be religious.