That's in case Huckabee makes it to the prez elections.Turquoise wrote:
True, but at the same time, I really don't see most black people having much in common with Huckabee -- unless they're really conservative and creationists.
Poll
Could Obama Lose Against a White Guy coz of Racism?
| Yes | 65% | 65% - 96 | ||||
| No | 34% | 34% - 51 | ||||
| Total: 147 | ||||||
Well, of course ya know if he loses, it is because all of us in the US are racists.sergeriver wrote:
Obama showed he can defeat a white woman and a white guy in the Iowa caucuses, but could he win against a white man in the presidential elections if he gets there? Could the presidential elections in the US be decided by the color of the guy running for president?
If the candidates are Obama and Huckabee, I hope Obama can win.
Agree.lowing wrote:
Well, of course ya know if he loses, it is because all of us in the US are racists.sergeriver wrote:
Obama showed he can defeat a white woman and a white guy in the Iowa caucuses, but could he win against a white man in the presidential elections if he gets there? Could the presidential elections in the US be decided by the color of the guy running for president?
If the candidates are Obama and Huckabee, I hope Obama can win.
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
I never said that. But you can vote for him, since the guy isn't a Muslim...lowing wrote:
Well, of course ya know if he loses, it is because all of us in the US are racists.sergeriver wrote:
Obama showed he can defeat a white woman and a white guy in the Iowa caucuses, but could he win against a white man in the presidential elections if he gets there? Could the presidential elections in the US be decided by the color of the guy running for president?
If the candidates are Obama and Huckabee, I hope Obama can win.
Last edited by sergeriver (2008-01-06 03:29:39)
No I can't he is a socialist/liberal democrat.sergeriver wrote:
I never said that. But you can vote for him, since the guy isn't a Muslim...lowing wrote:
Well, of course ya know if he loses, it is because all of us in the US are racists.sergeriver wrote:
Obama showed he can defeat a white woman and a white guy in the Iowa caucuses, but could he win against a white man in the presidential elections if he gets there? Could the presidential elections in the US be decided by the color of the guy running for president?
If the candidates are Obama and Huckabee, I hope Obama can win.
I know, what a communist.lowing wrote:
No I can't he is a socialist/liberal democrat.sergeriver wrote:
I never said that. But you can vote for him, since the guy isn't a Muslim...lowing wrote:
Well, of course ya know if he loses, it is because all of us in the US are racists.
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.sergeriver wrote:
I know, what a communist.lowing wrote:
No I can't he is a socialist/liberal democrat.sergeriver wrote:
I never said that. But you can vote for him, since the guy isn't a Muslim...
Of course not.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.sergeriver wrote:
I know, what a communist.lowing wrote:
No I can't he is a socialist/liberal democrat.
...........ANNNNNNNNDDDDDD.......................he is blacksergeriver wrote:
Of course not.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.sergeriver wrote:
I know, what a communist.
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.sergeriver wrote:
I know, what a communist.lowing wrote:
No I can't he is a socialist/liberal democrat.
-konfusion
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.konfusion wrote:
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.sergeriver wrote:
I know, what a communist.
-konfusion
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.konfusion wrote:
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.
-konfusion
That works both ways. Some idiots will vote him based on his race/religion/name/history and not his policies and some won't vote for him based on those things.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.konfusion wrote:
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.lowing wrote:
......and lets not forget his name reminds us too much of Osama Bin Ladin. We can have any of that.
-konfusion
Elections is all about getting the stupid vote anyway.
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.sergeriver wrote:
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.konfusion wrote:
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.
-konfusion
this is all very very trueMek-Izzle wrote:
That works both ways. Some idiots will vote him based on his race/religion/name/history and not his policies and some won't vote for him based on those things.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.konfusion wrote:
Actually, that can make a difference with the less intelligent voters - provided they figure out how to vote.
-konfusion
Elections is all about getting the stupid vote anyway.
he has a white mother and a black father,Missionless wrote:
This is a black man: http://www.elca.org/hunger/resources/hu … %20man.jpg
This is omaba: http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/his … Barack.jpg
I think hes more of a white man than a black one
for what I've heard, haven't followed these elections at all tho.
Oh don't go there, lowing. Both parties stand for big government, but when it comes down to it, I'd rather vote for the party that stands for social programs than the one that throws money down the drain on useless nation building.lowing wrote:
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.sergeriver wrote:
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.
then you stand for the big govt. that wants to control your finances, your retirement, your education, and your health insurance. Enjoy. I choose to keep my personal affairs out of the clutches of my socialist masters.Turquoise wrote:
Oh don't go there, lowing. Both parties stand for big government, but when it comes down to it, I'd rather vote for the party that stands for social programs than the one that throws money down the drain on useless nation building.lowing wrote:
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.sergeriver wrote:
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.
If he is Vice President, we'll have a woman President.
Why? Some black guy will kill the President believing that Obama deserved the spot but was shafted due to racism, then some vengeful hillbilly racist will cap Obama in retribution, leaving Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi as President.
Actually I'm against the guy because he's (1) a near socialist, (2) he attended a madrasa, and (3) he has next to no experience in government or business and absolutely none in an executive branch type role.
All the candidates this cycle have some sort of glaring problem, but I guess that's no different than any other election. I'll probably end up voting for my Dad as a write-in because I always vote but I can't even bring myself to pick a "most palatable alternative" from the shitbags/nutjobs we have running this go-round.
Why? Some black guy will kill the President believing that Obama deserved the spot but was shafted due to racism, then some vengeful hillbilly racist will cap Obama in retribution, leaving Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi as President.
Actually I'm against the guy because he's (1) a near socialist, (2) he attended a madrasa, and (3) he has next to no experience in government or business and absolutely none in an executive branch type role.
All the candidates this cycle have some sort of glaring problem, but I guess that's no different than any other election. I'll probably end up voting for my Dad as a write-in because I always vote but I can't even bring myself to pick a "most palatable alternative" from the shitbags/nutjobs we have running this go-round.
...and since I know the government is going to spend my money either way, I'd rather they spend it here.lowing wrote:
then you stand for the big govt. that wants to control your finances, your retirement, your education, and your health insurance. Enjoy. I choose to keep my personal affairs out of the clutches of my socialist masters.Turquoise wrote:
Oh don't go there, lowing. Both parties stand for big government, but when it comes down to it, I'd rather vote for the party that stands for social programs than the one that throws money down the drain on useless nation building.lowing wrote:
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.
Just a side note... I really doubt that Obama and Hillary will be on the same ticket, regardless of which one wins the nomination. Those 2 hate each other with a passion.Dersmikner wrote:
If he is Vice President, we'll have a woman President.
Why? Some black guy will kill the President believing that Obama deserved the spot but was shafted due to racism, then some vengeful hillbilly racist will cap Obama in retribution, leaving Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi as President.
Actually I'm against the guy because he's (1) a near socialist, (2) he attended a madrasa, and (3) he has next to no experience in government or business and absolutely none in an executive branch type role.
All the candidates this cycle have some sort of glaring problem, but I guess that's no different than any other election. I'll probably end up voting for my Dad as a write-in because I always vote but I can't even bring myself to pick a "most palatable alternative" from the shitbags/nutjobs we have running this go-round.
Do you hate everyone who isn't a white, American atheist?Mitch wrote:
If the final elections are between Obama and a white guy, and the white guy wins, Obama is gunna bring up the fact that race had something to do with it, and even the fact that racists played a part in it.
They want to control or curtail even the money or choices that they do not get in taxes. That is the real problemTurquoise wrote:
...and since I know the government is going to spend my money either way, I'd rather they spend it here.lowing wrote:
then you stand for the big govt. that wants to control your finances, your retirement, your education, and your health insurance. Enjoy. I choose to keep my personal affairs out of the clutches of my socialist masters.Turquoise wrote:
Oh don't go there, lowing. Both parties stand for big government, but when it comes down to it, I'd rather vote for the party that stands for social programs than the one that throws money down the drain on useless nation building.
Democrats = lack of responsibility? All Democrats lack responsibility? I dunno.lowing wrote:
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.sergeriver wrote:
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.lowing wrote:
actually, the less inteligent voters will vote for him because of his race and not his view points on the issues.
Huh? Obama hasn't beaten anybody yet, he's gotten by as the Democrat #1 in Iowa, what does that mean?sergeriver wrote:
Obama showed he can defeat a white woman and a white guy in the Iowa caucuses,
Probably. Democrats feel they owe a debt to society. A debt they want to pay off with your money.sergeriver wrote:
Democrats = lack of responsibility? All Democrats lack responsibility? I dunno.lowing wrote:
nope actually the democrat voters are smart: only a sucker would take responsibility for his own life when he could pawn it off on big govt. to do it for him.sergeriver wrote:
The less intelligent voters vote Democrats? I'm just asking.
Go figure. Democrats new party of the Rich.
Last edited by The_Mac (2008-01-06 13:14:01)