Touché.Sgt.Gene wrote:
Way to edit after i post... douche fuck.usmarine2005 wrote:
read above douche fuckSgt.Gene wrote:
Typical answer...
Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.
Touché.Sgt.Gene wrote:
Way to edit after i post... douche fuck.usmarine2005 wrote:
read above douche fuckSgt.Gene wrote:
Typical answer...
Well the dog had to take a shit....so sorry princess.Sgt.Gene wrote:
My post was posted before your edit was.
Need an RFID chip in your left arm and iris/facial features encoded into a government data base and to protect you from the big bad terrorists?usmarine2005 wrote:
need a tin foil hat?CommieChipmunk wrote:
what are you seriously?usmarine2005 wrote:
I have no problem with that.
You seem to have issues. Let's clear some things up.
The only liberties you have is what the govt allows you to have. yes, that is true and that is life. You want to fight it? By all means. Good luck.
What if this is what I want my liberties to be? Are your liberties more important than mine? Well in your mind it is. In my mind it is not. That is why we elect people to decide.
You sir need to go find another country.
Last edited by CommieChipmunk (2007-12-29 23:57:15)
soldevilla13 wrote:
Usmarine, we are having a discussion, there is no need to go swearing at people and being rude.
I for one will not bend over and be fucked by the long dick of the bush administration.
Last edited by Mek-Izzle (2007-12-30 04:07:51)
The Sheriff wrote:
soldevilla13 wrote:
Usmarine, we are having a discussion, there is no need to go swearing at people and being rude.
I for one will not bend over and be fucked by the long dick of the bush administration.
You are such a muppet. First off, he would be out of office before this program would actually start. Second, it would have to go through Congress or some committee first anyway.soldevilla13 wrote:
I for one will not bend over and be fucked by the long dick of the bush administration.
Ya bring those guys up. Most of them owned slaves. I guess they believed in liberties for whites only.CommieChipmunk wrote:
Why the fuck should a bunch of rich powerful morons decide what liberties I have, my forefathers gave me my liberties in the form of a Constitution which your buddies are in the midst of shredding to pieces in the holy name of "anti-terrorism".
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-12-30 07:49:20)
Then it is up to our democrat saviours to save us isn't it? Althought their current record in Congress gives me little hope.soldevilla13 wrote:
trying to complete whatever subversive act that the leaders of teh administration have started at this point.
Wow, sounds like such a defender of democracy...but then im not surprised.usmarine2005 wrote:
need a tin foil hat?CommieChipmunk wrote:
what are you seriously?usmarine2005 wrote:
I have no problem with that.
You seem to have issues. Let's clear some things up.
The only liberties you have is what the govt allows you to have. yes, that is true and that is life. You want to fight it? By all means. Good luck.
What if this is what I want my liberties to be? Are your liberties more important than mine? Well in your mind it is. In my mind it is not. That is why we elect people to decide.
You sir need to go find another country.
so shred the constitution because technology progresses? Hardly the thinking of a strong democratic nation. Sounds more like roll over and die, which isnt an option from my point of view. But you have fun with that.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
the forefathers didn't have the ability to travel around the world in the same day... the rules have changed...
its called being full of shit.SharkyMcshark wrote:
What I don't get is this:
All the patriotic 'I shit apple pie and chow big business tobacco' people have no problem bending over and getting metaphorically bum raped by the administration with regard to submitting to having all their details (fingerprints, iris scans, face scans) put on record (I'm against that on the grounds that it carries the inferred presumption that everyone is a criminal or will engage in activity at some point, but thats neither here nor there).
But these are the same people that defend their 2nd commandment amendment to bear arms stating that they may require them to de throne a tyrannical regime (not saying that the current regime is tyrannical).
So I'm left wondering whether these two beliefs conflict?
Oh shut the fuck up. If I do not think it is a problem like you do, that makes me bad? Fuck off,golgoj4 wrote:
Wow, sounds like such a defender of democracy...but then im not surprised.
or fingerprints, or a drivers licence, or a telephone.GunSlinger OIF II wrote:
all the outrage. None of you must have a social security number.
Last edited by usmarine2005 (2007-12-30 12:07:28)