I've sat in a 300C/Crossfire etc.. they're not that bad. American cars that sell over here tend to be of decent quality. The one's that are only sold in North America are the one's that you need to avoid. Mainstream american cars are usually terrible. Except for some Fords, even then they have a seperate European/Asian division anyway...
Damn skippy!! Cant wait to see one of those cruisin' down the road.d3athwi5h4 wrote:
So very true. Mopar or no carstryyker wrote:
2008 Challenger > 2008 Camaro
More pics pls - I need a new wallpaper
Nissan GT-R = Mitsubishi Evo X > 2008 Camaro & Challenger.
End of.
End of.
#rekt
I want US car prices.
An average vegetable costs more than 20k where I live...
An average vegetable costs more than 20k where I live...
Except there's only 1000 GT-r's being produced a month. Many more from Chevy and Mopar. Not to mention that it's base price is...$70k, and then add the premium for the car being in high demand with a low supply...and you have a car that costs upwards of 80-90K. No thanks.mint-sauce-41 wrote:
Nissan GT-R = Mitsubishi Evo X > 2008 Camaro & Challenger.
End of.
Oh, that and that Nissan is ugly as sin.
Nissans are fading out. Too overused.
? So the exported ones are made better? Sounds like a ridiculous claim to me.Mekstizzle wrote:
I've sat in a 300C/Crossfire etc.. they're not that bad. American cars that sell over here tend to be of decent quality. The one's that are only sold in North America are the one's that you need to avoid. Mainstream american cars are usually terrible. Except for some Fords, even then they have a seperate European/Asian division anyway...
Last edited by CC-Marley (2007-12-07 11:15:52)
I'll take one of these.
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/15/detr … r-concept/
With a side of this.
http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/tomahawk.html
<3
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/15/detr … r-concept/
With a side of this.
http://www.allpar.com/cars/concepts/tomahawk.html
<3
Normally I hate American cars (shitty build quality and horrible cornering FTL) but Vipers always appeal to me.
Don't like US cars, more into fast hatchbacks. 240BHP VW Golf G60 > Camaro's.
No, the models that are good enough to be marketed and sold outside of North America are usually the only American cars that are decent.CC-Marley wrote:
? So the exported ones are made better? Sounds like a ridiculous claim to me.Mekstizzle wrote:
I've sat in a 300C/Crossfire etc.. they're not that bad. American cars that sell over here tend to be of decent quality. The one's that are only sold in North America are the one's that you need to avoid. Mainstream american cars are usually terrible. Except for some Fords, even then they have a seperate European/Asian division anyway...
Reasons ploxChevyLee86 wrote:
were did you read that? the ss will be 35+ lolblademaster wrote:
20k to 25k for an SS versionPoseidon wrote:
How much is it, though?
What's the base price?
chevy > mopar = ford = poop
Looks good but let me guess.... american car = stoneage technologhy
Drives good as long as the road is straight.... one turn and you get seasick....
Drives good as long as the road is straight.... one turn and you get seasick....
Stoneage because they are re-inventing a classic? I don't see the reference.TheGiantSE wrote:
Looks good but let me guess.... american car = stoneage technologhy
Drives good as long as the road is straight.... one turn and you get seasick....
besides, no car in production has anything really "awe inspiring" or super advanced. Show me a hover car and I will call all other cars ancient.
Last edited by stryyker (2007-12-07 13:08:23)
Think it's more the fact American cars tend to use 30 year old engine technology.
Golf's better than a Camaro? Bull-freaking-shit. You must be part of the tuner scene, go back to your civic._NL_Lt.EngineerFox wrote:
Don't like US cars, more into fast hatchbacks. 240BHP VW Golf G60 > Camaro's.
It sounds like you oughtta stay out of the car area of the forums.8thward wrote:
It looks sexy as long as it has a V8 unlike the previous versions on the Camaro
15 more years! 15 more years!
Corvette LS7 > GT-R, and that's the appropriate price range.mint-sauce-41 wrote:
Nissan GT-R = Mitsubishi Evo X > 2008 Camaro & Challenger.
End of.
there...
now you can all go kill yourselves
I've seen Ford Powerstrokes with better 1/4th mile times.Shaguart wrote:
http://www.automotivearticles.com/uploa … al-007.jpg
there...
now you can all go kill yourselves
You think the new dodge and chevy looks any better. Challenger - more rounded than the 60s/70ss model, Camaro - Is that the best chevy can come up with(based on design)?BlackKoala wrote:
Except there's only 1000 GT-r's being produced a month. Many more from Chevy and Mopar. Not to mention that it's base price is...$70k, and then add the premium for the car being in high demand with a low supply...and you have a car that costs upwards of 80-90K. No thanks.mint-sauce-41 wrote:
Nissan GT-R = Mitsubishi Evo X > 2008 Camaro & Challenger.
End of.
Oh, that and that Nissan is ugly as sin.
So tell me, what has changed about the internal combustion engine in the last 30 years?TheEternalPessimist wrote:
Think it's more the fact American cars tend to use 30 year old engine technology.
I like these pics better.
