Who has the SLOWEST rig

2007-08-04 07:26:26

#101

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6565|Area 51

I used to play with.

AMD Athlon 2100 +
512 MB RAM, luckily it got upgraded to 1 gig.
80 GB HD.
and a Ati Radeon 9800 pro.

Not the worst though. Medium settings on a 32 man server.

2007-08-05 00:17:42

#102

Todd_Angelo: Leukocyte; +336|6627|Warlord

0akleaves wrote:
Todd_Angelo wrote:
0akleaves wrote:
3200+
6200
512 unbranded ram
17 inch 8ms screen
150 gb ide hd
OakLeaves wrote:
my specs;

amd athlon 64 3200+
7600gt xfx
2gb corsair pc3200
win xp sp2
trust you...

Yes, you can.

2007-08-05 02:22:06

#103

Gawwad: My way or Haddaway!; +212|6685|Espoo, Finland

When BF2 came out:

AMD 3000+ @ 2.2GHz
512MB PC3200
GeForce 6800le
120GB IDE

Played just fine.

After a few patches I bought another 512 stick of PC3200 and could play for a few patches.
Nowadays it's pretty much unplayable on my specs.

I've got my new pc coming soon though so I might get back to the battlefield once it arrives

2007-08-05 03:28:36

#104

JaMrulezass: Member; +47|6464|Hong Kong

QX6850
8800 Ultra SLI
16GB RAM (4x4GB)
Raptor 150GB in Raid 0
X-FI Elite Pro
Vista Ultimate 64-bit

nah just joking, i wish

2007-08-05 20:14:32

#105

Freezer7Pro: I don't come here a lot anymore.; +1,447|6197|Winland

Pacer wrote:
Freezer7Pro wrote:
You fail. BF2 was written on a 6600GT. They are DX9 compatible. Even most GeForce FX (5000 series) series cards are DX9 compatible. If your card wouldn't be more than DX7 capable, you wouldn't be able to play anything but CS 1.6 and HLDM.
I know its DX9 capable but it's capabilities are poor at best. I tried it for COD2 at the lowest settings and absolutely had to change to DX7 for multiplayer.

It's just the speed of the card. If it wouldn't be DX9 capable, you wouldn't be able to play either BF2 or CoD2. Not even start the games! An nVidia GeForce FX5200 is as DX9 compatible as a 7800GTX. The FX5200 is just not as fast. There is a HUGE differance between DirectX compatibility and speed. Huge!

The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP

2007-08-05 21:18:23

#106

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,053|6772|PNW

Intel 80486DX-33
4MB RAM
Sound Blaster
8MBMB HDD with multiple partitions.
Some sort of unidentifiable video card.
5 1/4 floppy drive with cracked face.
IBM PC-DOS 3.2
Steel chassis, bent from two or three falls.

I also have a custom rig on a breadboard with a Zilog Z80 CPU, but it can't do much more than make lights flash in funny patterns.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-08-05 21:20:05)

2007-08-05 21:20:32

#107

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6720|California

PIII
128mb of ram.

nothing else.

2007-08-05 22:08:36

#108

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6654

My computer is the worst. I play 800x600 with everything on low, no AA, no other fancy stuff, and I still get drops in framerate on occasion.

AMD Sempron 3000+
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro

Other stuff:
2.0 GB of RAM (it's mixed RAM, that's a no-no, I know)
150 GB Maxtor IDE HDD
Mobo: MSI K7N2 Delta

2007-08-05 22:37:24

#109

Liberal-Sl@yer: Certified BF2S Asshole; +131|6456|The edge of sanity

My old Rig:

AMD Athlon XP 3200+ (Socket 754) 32bit
1GB DDR333 RAM
256MB AGP 8x Radeon 9550
60GB HD
on board sound

2007-08-05 22:41:59

#110

HSG: Member; +23|6474|British Columbia, Canada

trippy982 wrote:
Pentium II 450MhZ MMX Edition
128MB RAM
Voodoo 2 SLI
Windows 98 SE
3.2 GB HDD

Lol do you play bf2 on 128 ram

BF2S Forums Who has the SLOWEST rig

0akleaves wrote:

Todd_Angelo wrote:

0akleaves wrote:

OakLeaves wrote:

Pacer wrote:

Freezer7Pro wrote:

trippy982 wrote:

Board footer