If there was a thread about how bad your friends and family members were, would you let it stay negative?Bubbalo wrote:
None of you lot will allow a thread about your troops to stay negative.Stingray24 wrote:
I'm really disappointed with those of you who simply cannot allow a thread about our troops to stay positive.
Something about a Marine and prison.......Bubbalo wrote:
What thread has there been about US troops being bad where they haven't been defended?usmarine2005 wrote:
BullshitBubbalo wrote:
None of you lot will allow a thread about your troops to stay negative.
Yeah it would be nice just to keep it as it was intended.Stingray24 wrote:
I'm really disappointed with those of you who simply cannot allow a thread about our troops to stay positive. I question why you are posting in this thread. It can't be balance because there's an abundance of threads that focus on the extremely small minority of soldiers that do the wrong thing. If anyone wants to throw mud at our brave men and women in the United States armed forces please start your own thread for your next session of finger-pointing at the troops. Allow this one to stay focused on all the positive things our soldiers do.
Ever find it strange that other countries wrongdoings are never broadcast like they would be if it were the US?usmarine2005 wrote:
Something about a Marine and prison.......Bubbalo wrote:
What thread has there been about US troops being bad where they haven't been defended?usmarine2005 wrote:
Bullshit
Point is, all we (you) ever talk about is the bad, never ever any good. That is the point of this thread. But you just can't have that I guess so bash away.
But, since you want to be negative, let's include YOUR countrymen also.
http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fair … age27.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 02,00.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/ … ractor.php
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Aus … 88945.html
Last edited by M.O.A.B (2007-07-28 13:49:26)
I find it..................... normal.M.O.A.B wrote:
Yeah it would be nice just to keep it as it was intended.Stingray24 wrote:
I'm really disappointed with those of you who simply cannot allow a thread about our troops to stay positive. I question why you are posting in this thread. It can't be balance because there's an abundance of threads that focus on the extremely small minority of soldiers that do the wrong thing. If anyone wants to throw mud at our brave men and women in the United States armed forces please start your own thread for your next session of finger-pointing at the troops. Allow this one to stay focused on all the positive things our soldiers do.Ever find it strange that other countries wrongdoings are never broadcast like they would be if it were the US?usmarine2005 wrote:
Something about a Marine and prison.......Bubbalo wrote:
What thread has there been about US troops being bad where they haven't been defended?
Point is, all we (you) ever talk about is the bad, never ever any good. That is the point of this thread. But you just can't have that I guess so bash away.
But, since you want to be negative, let's include YOUR countrymen also.
http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fair … age27.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 02,00.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/ … ractor.php
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Aus … 88945.html
Suppose you're right actually.usmarine2005 wrote:
I find it..................... normal.M.O.A.B wrote:
Yeah it would be nice just to keep it as it was intended.Stingray24 wrote:
I'm really disappointed with those of you who simply cannot allow a thread about our troops to stay positive. I question why you are posting in this thread. It can't be balance because there's an abundance of threads that focus on the extremely small minority of soldiers that do the wrong thing. If anyone wants to throw mud at our brave men and women in the United States armed forces please start your own thread for your next session of finger-pointing at the troops. Allow this one to stay focused on all the positive things our soldiers do.Ever find it strange that other countries wrongdoings are never broadcast like they would be if it were the US?usmarine2005 wrote:
Something about a Marine and prison.......
Point is, all we (you) ever talk about is the bad, never ever any good. That is the point of this thread. But you just can't have that I guess so bash away.
But, since you want to be negative, let's include YOUR countrymen also.
http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fair … age27.html
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 02,00.html
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/ … ractor.php
http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Aus … 88945.html
Balance.usmarine2005 wrote:
So what is the point of posting that picture?m3thod wrote:
tut tut tutusmarine2005 wrote:
What is that from? A woman having her genitals mutilated?
Balance? Ok....go balance all the threads in this section then. For every slap at the US, make one that gives it a pat on the back for something.m3thod wrote:
Balance.usmarine2005 wrote:
So what is the point of posting that picture?m3thod wrote:
tut tut tut
Nousmarine2005 wrote:
Balance? Ok....go balance all the threads in this section then. For every slap at the US, make one that gives it a pat on the back for something.m3thod wrote:
Balance.usmarine2005 wrote:
So what is the point of posting that picture?
May I ask why?m3thod wrote:
Nousmarine2005 wrote:
Balance? Ok....go balance all the threads in this section then. For every slap at the US, make one that gives it a pat on the back for something.m3thod wrote:
Balance.
cos i can't be dicked.M.O.A.B wrote:
May I ask why?m3thod wrote:
Nousmarine2005 wrote:
Balance? Ok....go balance all the threads in this section then. For every slap at the US, make one that gives it a pat on the back for something.
Nor can I. I'm off the Kansas City for a day. Bye tosser.m3thod wrote:
cos i can't be dicked.M.O.A.B wrote:
May I ask why?m3thod wrote:
No
If they deserved it? Damn right I would.SenorToenails wrote:
If there was a thread about how bad your friends and family members were, would you let it stay negative?Bubbalo wrote:
None of you lot will allow a thread about your troops to stay negative.Stingray24 wrote:
I'm really disappointed with those of you who simply cannot allow a thread about our troops to stay positive.
Didn't think so.
Most liberals have a stash of those kind of photos along with pictures of dead soldiersusmarine2005 wrote:
Who was laughing? And where are those pics from? And who hurt them? Insurgents or US troops?[pt] KEIOS wrote:
http://mpwatch.blogs.com/photos/uncateg … _child.jpg
http://www.worlddreamspeacebridge.org/i … child1.jpg
still funny?
GTFO asswipe.
Have fun douchebag.usmarine2005 wrote:
Nor can I. I'm off the Kansas City for a day. Bye tosser.m3thod wrote:
cos i can't be dicked.M.O.A.B wrote:
May I ask why?
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?m3thod wrote:
Have fun douchebag.
Ya, i do not consider Mr Marine to be a defender of freedom.The_Mac wrote:
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?m3thod wrote:
Have fun douchebag.
Because I'm not sure if you're expressing the right to convey yourself in the least intelligent way, or if you seriously think you're achieving something for your life and country by calling a defender of freedom a douchebag. Because it's not very intelligent. You might be taken for Cameron Poe.
(Operating under the assumption that usmarine is, indeed, a defender of freedom...) wouldn't he be happy that m3thod is utilizing the very thing he stood to protect? What's the problem?The_Mac wrote:
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?m3thod wrote:
Have fun douchebag.
Because I'm not sure if you're expressing the right to convey yourself in the least intelligent way, or if you seriously think you're achieving something for your life and country by calling a defender of freedom a douchebag. Because it's not very intelligent. You might be taken for Cameron Poe.
Not right in the head.David.P wrote:
Damn it why is that pedo posting here? Does'nt he have some little boys to chase? (Look up)
He's going after marine personally not the brass that makes the decisions.RedTwizzler wrote:
(Operating under the assumption that usmarine is, indeed, a defender of freedom...) wouldn't he be happy that m3thod is utilizing the very thing he stood to protect? What's the problem?The_Mac wrote:
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?m3thod wrote:
Have fun douchebag.
Because I'm not sure if you're expressing the right to convey yourself in the least intelligent way, or if you seriously think you're achieving something for your life and country by calling a defender of freedom a douchebag. Because it's not very intelligent. You might be taken for Cameron Poe.
Last edited by David.P (2007-07-28 16:58:01)
That's his freedom, is it not?David.P wrote:
He's going after marine personally not the brass that makes the decisions.RedTwizzler wrote:
(Operating under the assumption that usmarine is, indeed, a defender of freedom...) wouldn't he be happy that m3thod is utilizing the very thing he stood to protect? What's the problem?The_Mac wrote:
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?
Because I'm not sure if you're expressing the right to convey yourself in the least intelligent way, or if you seriously think you're achieving something for your life and country by calling a defender of freedom a douchebag. Because it's not very intelligent. You might be taken for Cameron Poe.
Fine then. Next time you come under attack by terrorists the Marines leave you to die.RedTwizzler wrote:
That's his freedom, is it not?
I could say all marines can burn in hell, and I'm still within my constitutional rights as an American citizen.
Last edited by David.P (2007-07-28 17:00:03)
Mr Marine is a big boy I'm sure he knows how to wipe his ass. And I seriously doubt Mr Marine has ever done anything to protect the fine upstanding gentleman that is I....unless he fought in WW2....David.P wrote:
He's going after marine personally not the brass that makes the decisions.RedTwizzler wrote:
(Operating under the assumption that usmarine is, indeed, a defender of freedom...) wouldn't he be happy that m3thod is utilizing the very thing he stood to protect? What's the problem?The_Mac wrote:
Is this one of those freedoms where you can express yourself?
Because I'm not sure if you're expressing the right to convey yourself in the least intelligent way, or if you seriously think you're achieving something for your life and country by calling a defender of freedom a douchebag. Because it's not very intelligent. You might be taken for Cameron Poe.
Seriously homes, anger management classes.David.P wrote:
Fine then. Next time you come under attack by terrorists the Marines leave you to die.RedTwizzler wrote:
That's his freedom, is it not?
I could say all marines can burn in hell, and I'm still within my constitutional rights as an American citizen.
