XBurnerX wrote:
XBurnerX wrote:
Drakef wrote:
Your ideas on political ideologies are amazing...Idiotic, but amazing.
Thas ok. You stay in Canada, and I'll stay here in the best country in the world. Enjoy your "free" health care.
I defy anyone to find one point in my statement that criticizes Canada. Its hilarious that you waste all that time to type something that has no relevance. I didnt make generalizations; hence I put "when i think..." in my sentances to inform the reader of my opinion. Its also hilarious that you "wouldnt for a second pretend that Canada is the best country in the world."
Be prepared to defend my comments? wtf? What i think is what I think. See, in my country I am allowed to voice my opinion without fear of having that opinion silenced. Nice job on throwing the first stone for the thought police!
And so i repeat. Its OK!!! you stay in Cananda, and I'll stay here in the best country in the world.
An even stranger response than your first one.
Firstly, I might comment that you criticized the Canadian health care system. That might qualify as finding "one point in [your] statement that criticizes Canada". Additionally, you seem to believe that the United States is a better place than Canada. Although perhaps not truly within the definition of criticize, I found it brought an interesting angle to the discussion. I simply preferred that you defend your belief in your nation as the "best country in the world". However, you failed to bring up one point other than attempting to skirt the issue with by using personal statements such as trying to mock my writing. I'm sure it was "hilarious".
Secondly, I would like to point out your generalization that "the liberals..ban things like dodgeball in school because they dont want anyone to be singled out or get hurt". Perhaps that most strongly points out your ideals of generalizing, attempting to attack all liberals. While you do write of what you think, it still reveals some generalizing. I'm not saying that you necessarily will always use generalizations, as I do expect further comments from you to improve your reputation- It's not below you to forget your original statement and instead provide some evidence as to why liberals are at fault for the "pussification" of the United States of America (although, that seems like a generalization to me). Yet, I see no attempt by you to prove your comments other than trying to avoid the issue. You do well at that, by failing to answer the issue entirely and attempting to attack my credibility through personal attacks and sketchy arguments about freedom of speech. I might answer that I never spoke once of the freedom of speech, but rather instead that if you insist on making foolish comments, that you might as well be prepared to answer to criticism. You can attempt to attack me with statements such as "Nice job on throwing the first stone for the thought police!", but in reality, what you said has no weight other than some emotional and irrational response to me criticizing you. By all means, criticize Canada, as I have invited you to do, but foolish arguments that the United States enjoys a greater level of freedom than my nation only harms your credibility. Ironically, you seek to attack my credibility with little success.
Finally, I would ask why it is so hilarious that I refuse to identify my nation as the greatest? Are you so blinded that you assume that everyone must think their nation is the best? I can admit my country has faults; can you do the same about yours? I will repeat, that I desire to hear that you defend your statements, about why the States is the greatest, why liberals as at fault, or anything you try to say. Hell, while you do ignore these issues, you might even try to proficiently make an excellent point on attacking me- You fail to even prove why my first treatise "has no relevance!"