Rate the sig above

2007-07-23 14:13:34

#5251

Smithereener: Member; +138|6531|California

8/10
-A little big for my tastes
BUT
-I like HALO from the little I've played, so thats a +
-The text is cool looking

This is my first ever sig.
Just wanted to see what kind of feedback I could get with thi sig I made in like, 45 minutes. This was all done on GIMP, seeing as I don't want to pirate Photoshop and I'm too poor atm to afford it.

It's really, really simple (although simple was what I was aiming for). Most of the time spent was trying to figure out what buttons did what. Don't know how to use layers or anything, I'm thinking about trying out more advanced stuff later. The explosion looking things are meant to contradict that ice stripe down the middle. (Default GIMP textures and stuff)

2007-07-23 14:28:56

#5252

Graphic-J: The Artist formerly known as GraphicArtist-J; +196|6341|So Cal

OmniDeath wrote:
I do actually, and my current sig as an animated counterpart I stopped using because the other text was irrelevant now. Try looking around before you try and trash talk.
Most people do not do animated sig, however, because of file size limitations due to forum rules.
...

...
Ha ha... I hardly call that "trash talk", more of a call for more creativity in art in media in this thread. But whatever rocks your boat little man.

Last edited by GraphicArtist J (2007-07-23 14:30:56)

2007-07-23 14:48:32

#5253

Sarrk: O-O-O A-O A; +788|6871|Brisbane, Australia

Animated sigs are boring.

Except for my patented Laz0r eye beeeeeemz!

2007-07-23 15:14:22

#5254

Vilham: Say wat!?; +580|6981|UK

You damn iNFIDEL! nice idea 9/10

2007-07-23 15:16:00

#5255

_1_MAN-ARMY.17: Member; +27|6436|Turkey

nice sig i was playing on ks66 server year ago 9/10

2007-07-23 15:48:16

#5256

r'Eeee: That's how I roll, BITCH!; +311|6664

Too big to my liking, however I still think it's a good one. 6/10.

2007-07-23 17:39:27

#5257

.Sup: be nice; +2,646|6669|The Twilight Zone

10/10. no flaws. love the light from the back of the render.

https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

2007-07-23 18:34:26

#5258

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6859

GraphicArtist J wrote:
OmniDeath wrote:
I do actually, and my current sig as an animated counterpart I stopped using because the other text was irrelevant now. Try looking around before you try and trash talk.
Most people do not do animated sig, however, because of file size limitations due to forum rules.
...
...
Ha ha... I hardly call that "trash talk", more of a call for more creativity in art in media in this thread. But whatever rocks your boat little man.

"little man?" Lmao, how pathetic. "more creativity in art and media?" Anyone who thinks the signatures in this thread are artwork needs to get out from behind their computer more. and a bunch of blinking muppets is hardly a work of art, nor creative.

Enjoy your stay, and when you post in this thread, rate the sig above.

8/10 .Sup, nice and simple

2007-07-23 18:38:53

#5259

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6906|Devon, England

Looks too Mac-like for my liking.

-69/10

2007-07-23 18:40:18

#5260

Flaming_Maniac: prince of insufficient light; +2,490|6922|67.222.138.85

FFLink13 wrote:
Looks too Mac-like for my liking.

-69/10

Link is hawt in a completely heretosexual way. I like the background, but a little too much blank space. 8/10

2007-07-23 18:47:48

#5261

Smithereener: Member; +138|6531|California

OmniDeath wrote:
Anyone who thinks the signatures in this thread are artwork needs to get out from behind their computer more. and a bunch of blinking muppets is hardly a work of art, nor creative.

Enjoy your stay, and when you post in this thread, rate the sig above.

What people consider art is highly subjective IMO; one might see modern art as nothing compared to the old "masters" ("Pffft, it's only a bit of wire twirled into random shapes") while another might see the expression behind it. I'd consider many of the sigs here to be art; might not be masterpieces and the Mona Lisa, but art nonetheless.

At any rate, my first attempt at getting my sig rated seemed to fail, so here's another one.

@FFLink13 - 9/10, the colors seem to work well, the green distortion effect things looks pretty awesome.
@Flaming_Maniac - 9/10 also, I like simplicity in general, this one is sleek. Although the reflection on the "g" looks slightly strange because of the extension on the "g."

2007-07-23 18:54:40

#5262

OmniDeath: ~; +726|6859

Smithereener wrote:
OmniDeath wrote:
Anyone who thinks the signatures in this thread are artwork needs to get out from behind their computer more. and a bunch of blinking muppets is hardly a work of art, nor creative.

Enjoy your stay, and when you post in this thread, rate the sig above.
What people consider art is highly subjective IMO; one might see modern art as nothing compared to the old "masters" ("Pffft, it's only a bit of wire twirled into random shapes") while another might see the expression behind it. I'd consider many of the sigs here to be art; might not be masterpieces and the Mona Lisa, but art nonetheless.

At any rate, my first attempt at getting my sig rated seemed to fail, so here's another one.

@FFLink13 - 9/10, the colors seem to work well, the green distortion effect things looks pretty awesome.
@Flaming_Maniac - 9/10 also, I like simplicity in general, this one is sleek. Although the reflection on the "g" looks slightly strange because of the extension on the "g."

this has been debated before, and im not going to go into it again here.

6/10. the text doesn't really work imo and other than that its a lot of empty/boring space. i do like how the diagonal takes your eye right to the text though.

2007-07-23 18:56:01

#5263

FFLink: There is.; +1,380|6906|Devon, England

Smithereener wrote:
OmniDeath wrote:
Anyone who thinks the signatures in this thread are artwork needs to get out from behind their computer more. and a bunch of blinking muppets is hardly a work of art, nor creative.

Enjoy your stay, and when you post in this thread, rate the sig above.
What people consider art is highly subjective IMO; one might see modern art as nothing compared to the old "masters" ("Pffft, it's only a bit of wire twirled into random shapes") while another might see the expression behind it. I'd consider many of the sigs here to be art; might not be masterpieces and the Mona Lisa, but art nonetheless.

At any rate, my first attempt at getting my sig rated seemed to fail, so here's another one.

@FFLink13 - 9/10, the colors seem to work well, the green distortion effect things looks pretty awesome.
@Flaming_Maniac - 9/10 also, I like simplicity in general, this one is sleek. Although the reflection on the "g" looks slightly strange because of the extension on the "g."

But Mine's better right?!

lol

I like yours, it's coming along nicely

Gay colours, but still good

2007-07-23 19:01:56

#5264

Graphic: Real Horrorshow; +24|6710|Nevada

Very nice, Zelda is a classic 8/10

2007-07-23 21:40:37

#5265

CrapHand: Member; +6|6342|Dominican Republic

Graphic,

Nice sig and simply explained. Although the soldiers images needs a bit of contrast, they look a bit pale compared to the background, still a good sig.

8/10

I can't give a truly fair opinion technically since i'm a photoshop nooblet, the sig i'm wearing right now is actually my second signature, here's my first one:

https://img162.imageshack.us/img162/654/craphandchasinnoobstd7.png

Still funny, hehehe!

Last edited by CrapHand (2007-07-23 21:41:39)

2007-07-23 23:55:28

#5266

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6390|Sydney | ♥

you have hilarious text, wich make them both 7/10 but you need to take some tutorials....

Mine?

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2007-07-24 00:56:50

#5267

Raphi: Banned; +354|6474|Basel, Switzerland

Nice colourts and tex colour. Nice idea with the guy on the left, dont know what the hwhite thing is tough. 8/10

2007-07-24 01:21:31

#5268

Buckles: Cheeky Keen; +329|6771|Kent, UK

it's a bit "wtf?" and very simple. 5/10 for concept and design, 8/10 for getting the message across

2007-07-24 01:22:53

#5269

Fenris_GreyClaw: Real Хорошо; +826|6735|Adelaide, South Australia

Design POV: 8/10
My POV: 6/10

2007-07-24 01:24:28

#5270

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6390|Sydney | ♥

Well i know yours was made by sarkk, so to sarkk i give you 9/10, no 9.75, cause i'm aussie aswell

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2007-07-24 01:25:30

#5271

Xblade-3o5-: Oi, Suzy!; +113|6968|Florida, United States

I like the color 8.5/10

2007-07-24 01:27:22

#5272

tazz.: oz.; +1,338|6390|Sydney | ♥

THATS FKN AWESOME!!!!

10/10

Just the Pic, the effx and the text all blends in together to form a OMFG fuk me dead style of sig...

Awesome work man....

^{everything i write is a ramble and should not be taken seriously.... _{seriously. ♥}}

2007-07-24 01:31:08

#5273

Xblade-3o5-: Oi, Suzy!; +113|6968|Florida, United States

Hey thanks

Well I still like your sig 9/10

2007-07-24 07:27:54

#5274

Sarrk: O-O-O A-O A; +788|6871|Brisbane, Australia

The red hurts my eyes and it looks like a stone statue with anime hairz.

You win a 6/10

2007-07-24 07:32:10

#5275

Buckles: Cheeky Keen; +329|6771|Kent, UK

new sig!!
bold, simple, elegant.
8.5/10

BF2S Forums Rate the sig above

OmniDeath wrote:

GraphicArtist J wrote:

OmniDeath wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

OmniDeath wrote:

Smithereener wrote:

OmniDeath wrote:

Smithereener wrote:

OmniDeath wrote:

Board footer