| 1 | 1% | 1% - 2 | ||||
| 2 | 6% | 6% - 7 | ||||
| 3 | 20% | 20% - 22 | ||||
| 4 | 7% | 7% - 8 | ||||
| 5 | 4% | 4% - 5 | ||||
| 6 | 3% | 3% - 4 | ||||
| 7 | 28% | 28% - 30 | ||||
| 8 | 3% | 3% - 4 | ||||
| 9 | 2% | 2% - 3 | ||||
| 10 | 20% | 20% - 22 | ||||
| Total: 107 | ||||||
Wow. Omni is a psychic.OmniDeath wrote:
energy? expect a lot of pre rendered stuffs.
Last edited by Titch2349 (2007-06-26 08:06:46)
Oh really?Ryan wrote:
It's quite obvious how made 4..
alright. sorry, didnt know it was that big a deal..Entertayner wrote:
Z-Trooper would you stop ruining it for everyone else please, there's a reason I ask people not to put their names on it. I just don't have the time to upload them all by myself but if you're going to continue doing this then I'm gonna have to. Just stop doing it.
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-26 09:24:01)
Last edited by jsnipy (2007-06-26 09:34:39)
no, 4 has a commercial quality to it. you'd never see 6 in a magazine. it looks like someone took a picture of some windmills and blended the render from 5 over top of it.jsnipy wrote:
I said #10, its kickass.
#6 was a very close second and has commerical quality.
Last edited by OmniDeath (2007-06-26 09:57:36)
Last edited by DeathUnlimited (2007-06-26 10:14:37)
haha, and i thought i was harshZimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
What do you mean Zimmer? ImageShack acting up?Zimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
Leave. Now. Critic.Zimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
seriously, why do you come here to say that? 10 people have spend a lot of time on making a contribution for some weekly entertainment, and all you say is they are all crap "Ew"..Zimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
nah, mine took 5 minutes...now spot which one looks the least proffesional and you've got itZ-trooper wrote:
10 people have spend a lot of time on making a contribution
I'm gonna have to agree with him. As harsh as you can be you hardly enter these things to see how well you would really do. Not to mention your own sigs really don't say much about your abilities. Heck, your current sig looks like a resized version of some of the stock windows vista wallpaper.Z-trooper wrote:
seriously, why do you come here to say that? 10 people have spend a lot of time on making a contribution for some weekly entertainment, and all you say is they are all crap "Ew"..Zimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
make one and win the whole thing big time so we can see how its done properly
cant you just vote for the 'least crappy'?
Gotta say it, he is right...OmniDeath wrote:
I'm gonna have to agree with him. As harsh as you can be you hardly enter these things to see how well you would really do. Not to mention your own sigs really don't say much about your abilities. Heck, your current sig looks like a resized version of some of the stock windows vista wallpaper.Z-trooper wrote:
seriously, why do you come here to say that? 10 people have spend a lot of time on making a contribution for some weekly entertainment, and all you say is they are all crap "Ew"..Zimmer wrote:
Ew.
I'm guessing 4 is best, but I cannot see it properly, so I wont vote.
make one and win the whole thing big time so we can see how its done properly
cant you just vote for the 'least crappy'?
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k56/O … h/dock.jpg
Don't get me wrong, I often agree with some of your crits, but this was unnecessary as there are some good ones here.
