I LOVE that Pollux troy one, amazing man!
Does he use it?
Does he use it?
dont know if he still does, but he did once..White-Fusion wrote:
I LOVE that Pollux troy one, amazing man!
Does he use it?
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-21 15:01:07)
I love it man!Z-trooper wrote:
dont know if he still does, but he did once..White-Fusion wrote:
I LOVE that Pollux troy one, amazing man!
Does he use it?
EDIT:
he still does..
http://forums.bf2s.com/profile.php?id=13010
even though there are some horrible shadow spots I missed, the thing he is using is the 1st draft. most people never give feedback on the 1st draft so I can make it a bit more personal and such.. oh well their choice.
shot answer = yes...OmniDeath wrote:
i dont want to come off like i dont like you but...
first there was the issue with the sig of yours that just so happens to very closely resemble one of mine i did previously, but as i was skimming through your sigs i noticed this...
it looked reeaally familiar... sure enough this is a sig TimmmmaaaaH did sometime back in my thread...
are these just a series of coincidences or what?
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-22 02:13:22)
alright, i was trying to be nice about it. try reading my post. i didnt make the j-10 sig, TimmmmaaaaH did. and i dont accuse you of all sorts of things. the only thing i ever accused you of was stealing one of my ideas. thats one thing, not "all sorts." and i didnt accuse you of stealing the j-10 sig idea either. i just asked what was up because this seems to keep happening. deal with it.Z-trooper wrote:
shot answer = yes...OmniDeath wrote:
i dont want to come off like i dont like you but...
first there was the issue with the sig of yours that just so happens to very closely resemble one of mine i did previously, but as i was skimming through your sigs i noticed this...
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z232 … sideup.png
it looked reeaally familiar... sure enough this is a sig TimmmmaaaaH did sometime back in my thread...
http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/6484 … l22sy3.jpg
are these just a series of coincidences or what?
1. We used the same screenshots
2. There isnt much to do with those screenshots.
3. I had an Idea when I saw that screenshot, doing that "this side up" thing.. sorry it resembles one of your sigs which is just a cutout of the same plane from the same screenshot..
4. I dont go around looking for sigs to rip off, if you look through my list you can see that they are all very different.. so you found 1 (2) that looked lke one of your sigs because we used the same screenshot.. deal with it.
And the other sig you are refering to:
http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k56/O … elight.jpg
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z232 … inati3.png
again, the same arguments as before.. same screenshots..
he wanted a sig with wake and a F35 so I found the thread with screenshots we ALL can use as we like. the screenshot showed wake from above and a F35.. so I used it..
Can I not use those screenshots anymore?...
besides if you look again I made a 2nd draft for him.
http://i192.photobucket.com/albums/z232 … minati.png
besides why should I waste my time browsing the forum for an Idea when you can see from my history in this thread that I've done many different styles.. deal with it.
and if you are going to use the argument that they look similar because both planes streches outside the sig (transparant), if you would look at my sig history again! and you would hopefully see that I use that a lot...
I dont get why you always have to accuse me of all sorts of things. deal with it already.
and besides.. the new one I made, the one in question here (J-10), how can you possible know that you made it first? I could just as easily accuse you of ripping off my sig..
Last edited by OmniDeath (2007-06-22 02:18:03)
Do you really wanna post the screenshot and have OmniDeath and me both have a shot at it just for us to prove you wrong? Jesus fucking christ, that's the dumbest logic I've heard today and we've already had numerous people asking about stats on IRC.Z-trooper wrote:
2. There isnt much to do with those screenshots.
i actually kinda like that idea...Entertayner wrote:
Do you really wanna post the screenshot and have OmniDeath and me both have a shot at it just for us to prove you wrong? Jesus fucking christ, that's the dumbest logic I've heard today and we've already had numerous people asking about stats on IRC.Z-trooper wrote:
2. There isnt much to do with those screenshots.
oh well, sorry.. I'm not a pro at sigmaking, I just dont get why this is happening?OmniDeath wrote:
i actually kinda like that idea...Entertayner wrote:
Do you really wanna post the screenshot and have OmniDeath and me both have a shot at it just for us to prove you wrong? Jesus fucking christ, that's the dumbest logic I've heard today and we've already had numerous people asking about stats on IRC.Z-trooper wrote:
2. There isnt much to do with those screenshots.
You used it as an argument.. Why shouldn't we?Z-trooper wrote:
and yea, of cause you can do other stuff with it.. but dont use that as a argument, cause you can put it into paint and draw a big lion on it and it will be different.
how the hell can I disprove the accusation "you ripped off my sig idea".. its so easy to say, but impossible to prove..Entertayner wrote:
You used it as an argument.. Why shouldn't we?Z-trooper wrote:
and yea, of cause you can do other stuff with it.. but dont use that as a argument, cause you can put it into paint and draw a big lion on it and it will be different.
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-22 02:51:28)
i dont think tayners "fussed." i myself find this entertaining (no pun intended ).Z-trooper wrote:
how the hell can I disprove the accusation "you ripped off my sig idea".. its so easy to say, but impossible to prove..Entertayner wrote:
You used it as an argument.. Why shouldn't we?Z-trooper wrote:
and yea, of cause you can do other stuff with it.. but dont use that as a argument, cause you can put it into paint and draw a big lion on it and it will be different.
EDIT: I dont get why you are so fussed about it..
Well I am not finding it a bit funny.. you and tayner might think its funny anoying a PS/sig/danish noob by accusing me of stealing ideas..OmniDeath wrote:
i myself find this entertaining (no pun intended ).
1. sorry, its just that being accused of ripping off others work gets me worked up.. and that might be even more fun cause then I look like an unstable emo.. but you did sayEntertayner wrote:
1. When did I accuse you of anything?
2. Do you know how many hours I spent taking all those screenshots and uploading them?
3. You're quite obviously not a PS noob.
4. The thing that OmniDeath is saying that the sigs are pretty much exactly the same, you could have quite easily changed something little just to make it distinguishable between the two.
which isnt a nice thing to say.. I know I made a bad argument but its hard defending a point of view thats not easy to prove..Entertayner wrote:
[Jesus fucking christ, that's the dumbest logic I've heard today and we've already had numerous people asking about stats on IRC.
well, at least you were more subtle, lol$h0ck3r wrote:
before i get flamed saying, oh you think you could do better etc. here is proof that i can...
Entertayner wrote:
3. You're quite obviously not a PS noob.
.. to prove I'm right..:Z-trooper wrote:
3. thanks.. but I am, my methods are noobish and my work looks unfinished imo...
EDIT: and yeah, you are good, but if you know me thats not my style (and if you dont you saw it).. I dont like making those surreal stereotypical stylish sigs.. thats not my style at all.. made two of them though, dont like them,,$h0ck3r wrote:
the overall sig quality is bad imo. may i suggest reading some tutorials maybe, before i get flamed saying, oh you think you could do better etc. here are a few of mine below:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/ … cker-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/ … ions-1.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/sh0ck3r/2may.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/ … bf2sig.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v359/ … kercss.jpg
sorry missed that in the middle of it all:OmniDeath wrote:
well, at least you were more subtle, lol$h0ck3r wrote:
before i get flamed saying, oh you think you could do better etc. here is proof that i can...
OmniDeath wrote:
and for the last time, i didnt make both those sigs. i only made one of them.
- yeah I know that would be the easy way out, but I'm a man of pricipals. And imo I have nothing if I dont stick to them. And I kind of like mine the way they are, so why should I change them... (retorical question..) you make a good point, but it stays the way it is in my book..Entertayner wrote:
I know you didn't see them but when you did you should have said something like "Oh, sorry" and changed it a little so it's distinguishable. Not only for OmniDeath's sake but for your sake and to stop people giving him credit for sigs you've done and vice versa.
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-06-22 03:49:40)
Selvfølgelig.. det kigger jeg på i aften..[DK]130978 wrote:
Z-trooper .............kan jeg få dig til at lave en SIG med 2-3 lækre babes og hvor der står we love u [dk]130978 det kunne være nice hvis du gad det??jeg er overhovedet ikke en ekspert på computer,så jeg håber du kan hjælpe lidt??