Marinejuana
local
+415|6797|Seattle
Ever wondered why X, Y, or Z gun sucks? Well it probably doesn't. Many of the guns in BF2 have very misleading iron sights.
Numerous people around bf2s.com have accurately marked crosshairs in the past (such as scoutstrike, jemme and todd_angelo). In this thread I use their method of coloring the center pixels. By coloring in the center four pixels at 1280x1024 resolution, we are able to see which pixels on each iron sight represent the true center of your crosshair. You may need to download and zoom in on the images to use them to their full potential.

SIGNIFICANT UPDATE: All of the images in this thread have been replaced since my original post. I originally defined the center of each iron sight as it corresponded to BF2's unzoomed crosshairs. I have since learned that BF2's unzoomed crosshairs are misaligned for ALL weapons and appear accordingly:

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/unzoomedcrosshairs.png

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/unzoomedcrosshairs2.png
Close-up: You must aim slightly down and to the left.

It should be reiterated that all weapons featuring BF2's standard unzoomed sight suffer from this same alignment issue. So for example the m249 mounted guns, pistols, and 0.50 cal mounted guns (vodnik, DPV, roof of tank) all aim slightly up and to the right as depicted in the previous screenshot.

First of all:

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/screen047.png

Assault Rifles

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m16assault.png
m16assault - sights aim differently from medic

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m16a2.png
m16medic

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/ak101medickit.png
ak101 (assault and medic sights identical)

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/ak47assaultkit.png
ak47assault - sights aim differently from medic

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/ak47medicvariation.png
ak47medic

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/L85.png
L85medic

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/g3.png
G3

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/F2000.png
F2000

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/G36E.png
G36E

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/SCARH-1.png
SCARH

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/FAMAS.png
FAMAS

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/l85a2-1.png
L85A2

Nero wrote:

Sight Screenshots for M16 and AK:

https://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f188/Ninja018/screen114.jpg

https://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f188/Ninja018/screen112.jpg
Ive posted these numerous times but since they are on topic here, also have a look at these sight pics. The difference is Nero drew them from memory based on what he thinks works best. The main difference you notice is how low he aims the AK101. I also tend to use it this way, and I believe the reason it works is that recoil after your first shot causes the next ones to land further above the labeled "sweet spot," so in reality you want to aim roughly where where Nero marks when you are spamming and go for the spot marked on mine with your first shots. I find the M16 has so much less recoil so that consecutive shots dont appear to cause as much climb and hence Neros drawing shows the placement much lower on the sight than the AK101.

With recoil what it is, I suggest referring to neros images for most of your vertical alignment and my images for horizontal alignment.


Pistols

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/92fs.png
92FS

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/qsz92.png
QSZ92

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mr-444.png
MR444

Notice how high above the iron the sweet spot sits.

SMGs

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinaAT.png
TYPE85

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mp5.png
MP5

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/pp19.png
PP19

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/p90.png
P90

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mp7-3.png
MP7

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/MP7-4pixels.png
MP7 (Note this is the only weapon in BF2 with bobbing iron sights, they deviate vertically between 4 and 3 pixels)

LMGs

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinasupport.png
TYPE95

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/rpk74.png
RPK74

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m249.png
M249

Another weapon that requires aiming well below the target.

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/pkm.png
PKM

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/MG36.png
MG36

Look how far down the iron the bullets land.

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/EU-lmg.png
EU support LMG

Carbines

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m4.png
M4

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinaSO.png
QBZ97

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/ak74u.png
AK74U

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/g36c.png
G36C

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/SCARL.png
SCAR-L

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/G36K.png
G36K

Aims more like a G36E than a G36C

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/hk53.png
HK53 EU carbine

Red Dot Sights

Every weapon with a red dot sight in BF2 has essentially the same center point. So on your first shots, you aim a P90 the same as you would an M4, AK74U, or SCAR-L.

Grenade Launchers

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/grenadelaunchers.png

Take note of their tendency to fire to the right.

Shotguns

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/anyshotgun.png

All shotguns share this centerpoint, regardless of zoom.

Iron sight variation

The background can actually cut into the pixels you see on your iron sights making them vary slightly in different situations. This only jumped out after seeing screenshots of the same weapon next to each other. Its something to think about while looking at the SS but it may not matter much. This can be seen clearly in the following M24 sight.

Sniper Rifles

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/SVD.png
SVD

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m24.png
M24

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinasniper.png
PLA sniper

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m95.png
M95

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/L96.png
L96

AT Missiles

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/USBRITSFSRAW-1.png
SRAW US and UK(SF) notice its way off

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinaAT-2.png
ERYX China and MEC sights  (vanilla and SF) notice they are quite accurate

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/RPGSF-1.png
RPG (SF)

Vehicles

Yep. Note that orientation of gun mount can significantly affect aim at short range.

Jets

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mecbomberandfighter.png
Mig29 and Su34

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/J10.png
J10, Q5 Fantan, and Su-30

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/F15F18F35.png
F15, F18, F35, & Eurofighter

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/armoredfuryMECbomber.png
MEC attack jet in Armored Fury

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/A10.png
A10

Tanks

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/T90.png
T90

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/PLA-tank.png
PLA Tank

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/m1a2andchallenger.png
US & EU tanks


APCs

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/usmc-apc.png
USMC APC

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mec-apc.png
MEC APC

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/PLAAPC.png
China APC

Mobile AA

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/linebacker.png
Linebacker (US & EU)

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mecAA.png
MEC AA

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/chinesemobileAA.png
PLA AA

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/essex.png
Essex

Mini Choppers in Armored Fury

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/PLAarmoredfuryminichopperUSlittlebi.png
US, PLA, & MEC are the same (but dif color).

TOW Missiles

https://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i149/kyleomalley/mecEUUSTOW.png
All the TOW missiles (mec, china, us, EU) are the same.

Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-07-27 02:15:59)

NaytdawgUK
Member
+7|6410|essex, UK
well nice photoshopping, way to much time on your hands, but i fail to see the relivance, they line up as they should do fine, you ever held a rifle? in fact go get your broom, hold it under your arm then put it in your shoulder, see the differnce
masculata
Member
+24|6888|45° 30',North by 73° 35',West
Great work Marinejuana, thx
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6658|Chicago, IL
I don't get it...

G36E aside, you need to aim down the sight for long shots, and bullet scatter would offset any slight deviation in the scope/sight
NaytdawgUK
Member
+7|6410|essex, UK
why does everyone says 36e is the ultimate hacking weapon, i can miss just as well with it as any others, i make more kills with the scar - L
CyraX
Member
+5|6418
coolies gj marine, about time someone did it right
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6658|Chicago, IL

NaytdawgUK wrote:

why does everyone says 36e is the ultimate hacking weapon, i can miss just as well with it as any others, i make more kills with the scar - L
It is as accurate as a sniper rifle even when not zoomed, and has a ridiculous rate of fire
RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|6749|Chicago

S.Lythberg wrote:

NaytdawgUK wrote:

why does everyone says 36e is the ultimate hacking weapon, i can miss just as well with it as any others, i make more kills with the scar - L
It is as accurate as a sniper rifle even when not zoomed, and has a ridiculous rate of fire
That, coupled with the kit (Medic) which allows the infantryman to heal himself on command.
Fireteam_Delta
Member
+20|6645
+1 good job, and thanks for the info.
-|TS|-owNzu7
Member
+6|6631
the g36e is looked down upon by many because anyone can use it.  whereas the m16a2/ak-101/ak-47 take quite a bit of skill to use to their full potential g36e doesn't take any skill. As long as the person can aim and has decent reflexes the kill is theirs.

I personally can't stand it.
Ryan
Member
+1,230|7055|Alberta, Canada

A tenth of a millimeter won't matter when the bullets:

1. exit and don't always make a straight path
and
2. a bullet is quite larger, so it will still hit it's target even though the crosshairs may be off.

Now if this problem was true for the sniper rifles, then I would be a bit angry.
sfarrar33
Halogenoalkane
+57|6830|InGerLand
I didn't know there was any difference between the Ak-47 and the Ak-101's accuracies, at least this explains why I am more accurate at range with the 101. Good work
@Ryan: at range those 10ths add up and make you less accurate.
farmerfez
o wut?
+78|6742

Yeah i noticed this because back when i started playing bf2 i had a dot on my screen from CS (Sticky Tack ) and it never quite lined up. Thats why i took it off.
kajukenbo_kid
Member
+36|6627|...
marine is my hero
G.I.Dude(CAN)
Member
+3|6471|Vancouver, B.C.
so that's why i could hit anything with the MG36!

Good job man, thanks for posting.
G3|Genius
Pope of BF2s
+355|6838|Sea to globally-cooled sea
wow @ MR444 and the MG36

geez.  Thanks!

I always HATED the MG...now I know why!!  +1 because you taught me something
Brasso
member
+1,549|6842

Yeah I always sucked with the MG36 when I used it.  +1
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
التعريفات
Squiggles
+102|6579|Cali
Nice, +1.
التعريفات
Squiggles
+102|6579|Cali

ScoutStrike wrote:

If these screens were made in either 1280x1024, 1024x768 or 800x600, you just posted UTTER BULLSHIT.

The unzoomed crosshair is drawn off-center. There is actually NO pixel located at the center of your screen. All the width/height values are even numbers so the middle is between max/2 and max/2 +1, ie 400-401 and 300-301 for 800x600. I fail to see how you managed to paint that center with a lovely red crosshair 1 pixel wide. The real aimpoint is located at the edges of that pathetic crosshair, it's actually a square of 2 by 2 pixels. BUT THEN AGAIN, MAYBE THE FREAKING THING IS IN YOUR ARSE, YOU MORON!

Seriously, nice job on disinforming the noobs. So +1 for that, and maybe some karma for every fucktard that responded to this thread with comments like "Oh thanks, now I can aim properly." GUESS WHAT, YOU STILL CAN'T!

Good luck on doing the sniper rifles without a crosshair. NOOB.
O.o
lavadisk
I am a cat ¦ 3
+369|7041|Denver colorado

التعريفات wrote:

ScoutStrike wrote:

If these screens were made in either 1280x1024, 1024x768 or 800x600, you just posted UTTER BULLSHIT.

The unzoomed crosshair is drawn off-center. There is actually NO pixel located at the center of your screen. All the width/height values are even numbers so the middle is between max/2 and max/2 +1, ie 400-401 and 300-301 for 800x600. I fail to see how you managed to paint that center with a lovely red crosshair 1 pixel wide. The real aimpoint is located at the edges of that pathetic crosshair, it's actually a square of 2 by 2 pixels. BUT THEN AGAIN, MAYBE THE FREAKING THING IS IN YOUR ARSE, YOU MORON!

Seriously, nice job on disinforming the noobs. So +1 for that, and maybe some karma for every fucktard that responded to this thread with comments like "Oh thanks, now I can aim properly." GUESS WHAT, YOU STILL CAN'T!

Good luck on doing the sniper rifles without a crosshair. NOOB.
O.o
Qft....

Last edited by lavadisk (2007-06-03 17:42:46)

Monkeyman911
Dun wori, it's K.
+76|6633|California, US
this is pretty helpful thanks
damn the MR-444's sight sucks!
my pistol is the 92FS
S.Lythberg
Mastermind
+429|6658|Chicago, IL

ScoutStrike wrote:

If these screens were made in either 1280x1024, 1024x768 or 800x600, you just posted UTTER BULLSHIT.

The unzoomed crosshair is drawn off-center. There is actually NO pixel located at the center of your screen. All the width/height values are even numbers so the middle is between max/2 and max/2 +1, ie 400-401 and 300-301 for 800x600. I fail to see how you managed to paint that center with a lovely red crosshair 1 pixel wide. The real aimpoint is located at the edges of that pathetic crosshair, it's actually a square of 2 by 2 pixels. BUT THEN AGAIN, MAYBE THE FREAKING THING IS IN YOUR ARSE, YOU MORON!

Seriously, nice job on disinforming the noobs. So +1 for that, and maybe some karma for every fucktard that responded to this thread with comments like "Oh thanks, now I can aim properly." GUESS WHAT, YOU STILL CAN'T!

Good luck on doing the sniper rifles without a crosshair. NOOB.
https://www.benhirsch.net/gallery/data/thumbnails/130/flamed.jpg


/burn
Ty
Mass Media Casualty
+2,398|6986|Noizyland

Where was this posted before now...
Bah, doesn't matter. It was abviously lost in the tide of threads. Well done for bringing it back.
[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon
kajukenbo_kid
Member
+36|6627|...
marine>scoutstrike ...by alot
Marinejuana
local
+415|6797|Seattle

S.Lythberg wrote:

I don't get it...

G36E aside, you need to aim down the sight for long shots, and bullet scatter would offset any slight deviation in the scope/sight
Deviation can make any shot miss, but you have the highest probability of hitting if u have the probabalistic cone of your fire directly on the target. C'mon, I shouldn't have to tell you that, lol. And I can tell you that if you really do line these shots up and then compensate for recoil it is very possible to land consecutive hits at ranges you probably thought were reserved for snipers.


-|TS|-owNzu7 wrote:

the g36e is looked down upon by many because anyone can use it.  whereas the m16a2/ak-101/ak-47 take quite a bit of skill to use to their full potential g36e doesn't take any skill. As long as the person can aim and has decent reflexes the kill is theirs.

I personally can't stand it.
My data suggest that the other weapons hardly take more skill once you know where to aim them, the G36E is just so much more predictable in its shot placement because you can place the iron sights over a target to hit it (rather than under, which most people dont seem to intuit). But people also forget that the G36E is the ONLY rifle in BF2 where the crosshairs do not disappear as you jump. So this makes the G36E a good set of training wheels for dolphin diving, etc. Yet it's completely different sweet spot makes it difficult to transition between the G36E and the standard weapons (enter the G36E noob that can kill you instantly with the E but can hardly land shit with an M16 or AK). I personally dont mind G36E players only because it seems like you can drop with any assault rifle, aim correctly, and kill a target with a few quick clicks. Its a good gun but skill normally outweighs the difference it makes if you ask me. That pretty much goes for all unlocks in my opinion.

Ryan wrote:

A tenth of a millimeter won't matter when the bullets:

1. exit and don't always make a straight path
and
2. a bullet is quite larger, so it will still hit it's target even though the crosshairs may be off.

Now if this problem was true for the sniper rifles, then I would be a bit angry.
The problem is true for sniper rifles, Todd Angelo posted pics of it a long time ago and my current edit includes sniper pics. And sorry but you are just wrong on both accounts, in reality the bullets are quite small in BF2, and a first shot is almost always dead on accurate. You just have to learn where to shoot. Lucky thing you found this thread!

ScoutStrike wrote:

The unzoomed crosshair is drawn off-center. .
This was the critical piece of info that lead to major improvements in the pictures. The center of the screen is now my reference point for marking the sights. scoutstrike also gave helpful advice about maintaining pixel clarity with zoom.

Monkeyman911 wrote:

this is pretty helpful thanks
damn the MR-444's sight sucks!
my pistol is the 92FS
Hey now that you know where to shoot, its not so bad. Actually I have come to much prefer the weapons where you aim low because it means you can fully see your target and hit it at the same time. No bullshit trying to track a good bunnyhopper with the same sight that you are also concealing him with.

Ty wrote:

Where was this posted before now...
Bah, doesn't matter. It was abviously lost in the tide of threads. Well done for bringing it back.
Well in this form this wasn't posted until today because I painstakingly made these images for like 3 hours this morning. However I know that jemme and todd angelo have posted similar SS of the sniper rifles off center scopes and I even seem to recall like a year ago that somebody may have posted other shots like this of some of the weapons. I definitely know you can find similar images set up for chopper pilots at secretsofbattlefield.com.

Last edited by Marinejuana (2007-06-08 07:04:04)

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard