Noobier of the two..battle of the counter-strike games!!!!

2007-05-28 20:47:50

#1

m4s3rchi3f: Member; +122|6529

This dumbass chick said her cousin said that source is way more pro than 1.6. And that she has to wait to play 1.6 because she has to get a better graphics card...

I KNOW that 1.6 is considered better but still curious on people's thoughts....

BF2>1.6>Source

Stupid girls trying out gaming.

2007-05-28 20:49:06

#2

jsnipy: ...; +3,276|6757|...

a>b>c

2007-05-28 20:50:37

#3

stryyker: bad touch; +1,682|6954|California

Source is the noob of them all.

2007-05-28 21:40:22

#4

Mordoc_the_Gorilla: Banned

i just said 1.6 bc ive never played it

2007-05-28 21:44:25

#5

ThaReaper: Banned; +410|6874

Where is the 'all of the above' option.

2007-05-28 22:02:42

#6

cablecopulate: Member; +449|6972|Massachusetts.

Someone move this into the "Other Games" section so I don't ever have to see it again.

2007-05-29 05:38:42

#7

Dragonclaw: Member; +186|6539|Florida

CSS is the greatest game ever. To hack in. The nerdy whining voices make it worth it.

2007-05-29 05:39:55

#8

jord: Member; +2,382|6912|The North, beyond the wall.

CSS is better than 1.6, i know this without ever playing 1.6

2007-05-29 05:42:38

#9

B-Scimitar: Defeating your warriors.; +116|6643|Espoo, Finland

jord wrote:
CSS is better than 1.6, i know this without ever playing 1.6

QFT

2007-05-29 05:45:15

#10

=TBG=Zoton: my mum says i'm cool; +22|6889|Australia

I have never played either of the two because I know how bad people hack in it and I'm more than happy with the quality of the gaming in BF2

2007-05-29 05:45:45

#11

Longbow: Member; +163|6881|Odessa, Ukraine

Null vote . I don't play both

2007-05-29 06:36:28

#12

SH4D0W_S0UL: Member; +1|6835

I prefer 1.6, don't know why, CSS is good sometimes, but I could die laughing while playing 1.6

2007-05-29 09:22:25

#13

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6648|Finland

burst to legs in source -> headshot. that's how great hit boxes source has.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2007-05-29 09:23:59

#14

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6648|Finland

=TBG=Zoton wrote:
I have never played either of the two because I know how bad people hack in it and I'm more than happy with the quality of the gaming in BF2

and why you think no one hacks in bf2? I have seen so many hackers in both cs and bf2.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2007-05-29 09:25:20

#15

Entertayner: Member; +826|6805

Neither, idiot.

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
burst to legs in source -> headshot. that's how great hit boxes source has.

That's because with the AK you have to spray at legs, it's nothing to do with the hitboxes. One shot to the head will kill, a spray to the legs will get chest shots because of recoil. Know what you're talking about before you say things.

Last edited by Entertayner (2007-05-29 09:26:33)

2007-05-29 09:34:15

#16

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6648|Finland

Entertayner wrote:
Neither, idiot.

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
burst to legs in source -> headshot. that's how great hit boxes source has.
That's because with the AK you have to spray at legs, it's nothing to do with the hitboxes. One shot to the head will kill, a spray to the legs will get chest shots because of recoil. Know what you're talking about before you say things.

wtf I have played that game since it came and I definately know what I'm talking about. and I shot a burst with pistol not ak. I know what recoil is dude. I have played hl games in leagues too. so plz don't say I don't know what recoil is.

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2007-05-29 09:49:14

#17

Entertayner: Member; +826|6805

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Entertayner wrote:
Neither, idiot.

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
burst to legs in source -> headshot. that's how great hit boxes source has.
That's because with the AK you have to spray at legs, it's nothing to do with the hitboxes. One shot to the head will kill, a spray to the legs will get chest shots because of recoil. Know what you're talking about before you say things.
wtf I have played that game since it came and I definately know what I'm talking about. and I shot a burst with pistol not ak. I know what recoil is dude. I have played hl games in leagues too. so plz don't say I don't know what recoil is.

1. HL games does not = CS:S

2. You can't burst with pistol...

2007-05-29 09:53:15

#18

kylef: Gone; +1,352|6727|N. Ireland

The Glock has burst-fire.

I was an avid 1.6'er, but solely for graphics I moved onto Source.

2007-05-29 09:55:46

#19

maef: Member; +67|6917|Tulln, Austria

I don't even know what the difference is tbh.

Never played either.

2007-05-29 09:56:07

#20

GC_PaNzerFIN: Work and study @ Technical Uni; +528|6648|Finland

Entertayner wrote:
[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Entertayner wrote:
Neither, idiot.

That's because with the AK you have to spray at legs, it's nothing to do with the hitboxes. One shot to the head will kill, a spray to the legs will get chest shots because of recoil. Know what you're talking about before you say things.
wtf I have played that game since it came and I definately know what I'm talking about. and I shot a burst with pistol not ak. I know what recoil is dude. I have played hl games in leagues too. so plz don't say I don't know what recoil is.
1. HL games does not = CS:S

2. You can't burst with pistol...

dod, dod:s, cs, css they all use the same engines as hl and hl2.

Glock has burst fire mode too. go watch if you don't believe me
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw5vAcDI6yM

3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8

2007-05-29 09:57:01

#21

r'Eeee: That's how I roll, BITCH!; +311|6682

Both!

2007-05-29 09:58:26

#22

lavadisk: I am a cat ¦ 3; +369|7064|Denver colorado

I agree with both. I play those games but they still are really bad... DOD:S on the other hand...

2007-05-29 09:58:38

#23

bobby177: Member; +129|6708|Texas.. getting out asap

Source is so bad.... 1.6 is worlds better

2007-05-29 09:59:46

#24

Retalliation[1337]: Robin Hood ---> "u got arrownd"; +51|6709|Belgium

B-Scimitar wrote:
jord wrote:
CSS is better than 1.6, i know this without ever playing 1.6
QFT

QFTx2

2007-05-29 10:05:19

#25

Presence: Member; +2|6552

Anybody who started on CS, will tell you that its better than source, and anybody who started on source will tell you its better than 1.6, all a matter of opinion, and i like css better. However, they are much much better than bf2 in terms of competitive play. You don't have nerds tweaking their files to give them every possible advantage over other players. So, CSS>1.6>BF2

Cs:1.6	39%	39% - 31
CS: Source	60%	60% - 48
Total: 79

BF2S Forums Noobier of the two..battle of the counter-strike games!!!!

Poll

jord wrote:

=TBG=Zoton wrote:

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:

Entertayner wrote:

B-Scimitar wrote:

jord wrote:

Board footer