I got an A
i aRe l33t
oh mike I give u an 9/10
i aRe l33t
oh mike I give u an 9/10
Last edited by Gooners (2007-05-23 14:22:30)
I've looked at your sig for some time now.. I like the backgrond and the lines comming out from the sig.
I like the orange/black contrasts, and the "target" is fine too, but I dont like the "wings" on the target that much.. dunno why.. anyways..
8/10
I like the orange/black contrasts, and the "target" is fine too, but I dont like the "wings" on the target that much.. dunno why.. anyways..
8/10
Bit hard to tell that it says Z-TROOPER, you need to fix the T.
Other than that, i like it 8/10
Other than that, i like it 8/10
Nice work, but lacks a bit of wow factor
8/10
8/10
~ Do you not know that in the service … one must always choose the lesser of two weevils?
not much there, but your an aussie and the diggers squad badges look cool.R3v4n wrote:
Nice work, but lacks a bit of wow factor
8/10
8/10
Just made mine with the help of entertayner's screenshots. Thanks bro!
Nice one Timmmmmmaaaah, although I dont like the "frame" (edge), a thin black one would greatly improove the overall look.
7/10
7/10
Nice sig, 8/10; but the dust on the left next to the tank gets cut off, you may want to sort that out
3/10
3/10
59.5/100
5/10
Could u rate this one too please?
Edit: I know it has the white border there. But I will resize/crop it after I get an approval.
Last edited by Gooners (2007-05-24 16:47:45)
You are teh win Gooners 9/10Gooners wrote:
(it doesn't get 10 because it lacks a little personality...)
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
In my opinion its maybe a bit too bit, and you can see individual pixels (it looks like a .gif, which it is.. if you want to keep the transparantcy and stuff from .gif but want higher quality use .png which is a loss-less format that way the overall quality will rise) besides that you have mastered the color play as always..Gooners wrote:
overall 6-7/10
EDIT: the next person dont have to comment on mine since its already been commented on before, I just postet to give input to gooners sig
EDIT2: Well I dont want to rate ShawN_'s sig either since I made it with his ideas and such, so thats up to the next poster aswell
Last edited by Z-trooper (2007-05-25 03:48:53)
New sig... Please Rate
uh, now we are talking thats preetty darn nice and I see you have taken my advice an made one in .png format.. you see, the transparancy is much better and the quality of the picture speaks for itself..
its rare in my case but, what the hell you have put some effort into it
10/10 good job mate
its rare in my case but, what the hell you have put some effort into it
10/10 good job mate
i like alot
10/10
10/10
Pretty good, but a little empty and the render could use a little blending.
7/10
7/10
LOL A lot of effort? pffftt.... I did this in an hour, lol. But I geuss it does look better with the PNG format. Thx for the advice. Thx for the comment.Z-trooper wrote:
uh, now we are talking thats preetty darn nice and I see you have taken my advice an made one in .png format.. you see, the transparancy is much better and the quality of the picture speaks for itself..
its rare in my case but, what the hell you have put some effort into it
10/10 good job mate
Jenspm... 7/10, What is it?
Something you'll never get.... Or give....Gooners wrote:
LOL A lot of effort? pffftt.... I did this in an hour, lol. But I geuss it does look better with the PNG format. Thx for the advice. Thx for the comment.Z-trooper wrote:
uh, now we are talking thats preetty darn nice and I see you have taken my advice an made one in .png format.. you see, the transparancy is much better and the quality of the picture speaks for itself..
its rare in my case but, what the hell you have put some effort into it
10/10 good job mate
Jenspm... 7/10, What is it?
Last edited by Jenspm (2007-05-25 13:39:08)
What I ment by effort was that this is your third sig in here in a short period of time I thourght it was because you didnt like the 2 previous ones...Gooners wrote:
LOL A lot of effort? pffftt.... I did this in an hour, lol. But I geuss it does look better with the PNG format. Thx for the advice. Thx for the comment.Z-trooper wrote:
uh, now we are talking thats preetty darn nice and I see you have taken my advice an made one in .png format.. you see, the transparancy is much better and the quality of the picture speaks for itself..
its rare in my case but, what the hell you have put some effort into it
10/10 good job mate
Jenspm... 7/10, What is it?
anyways, the next person dont have to comment on mine since its already been commented on before, I just postet to give input to gooners sig ..
What do you guys think of this Dragon sig? RATE BOTH PLEASE
The arrows hurt my eyes. 5/10
0 no sig
Both sigs are sweet.. the Dragon I like better because it has more balance.