Since when do you know the Intent of the Iranian administration?Stingray24 wrote:
*sigh* You aren't listening . . .Fen321 wrote:
. . . I discussed this issue in my Arms Control class -- seeing as the teacher is quick to lambaste anything Iranian. Granted, other fellow class members responded to my support of a regime that they see as incoherent and irrational -- they same way the professor did. I always get a kick out of their one argument against Iran -- the lovely wipe Israel off the map argument. Its classic its usually followed by other short generalizations all in all to justify any aggressive action towards them.
So what happens when its a mis-translation.....nothing
For now the FOURTH time, even if the statement in question was misinterpreted (and even with the "correct" interpretation the same intent is present) the leader of Iran has repeated this sentiment numerous times - Ahmedinijad's stance towards Israel is not up for debate.
Nice to see you finally admit you support the Iranian regime. That explains why your comparison of possible US military action against Iran with complete annihilation of Israel is so grossly inaccurate.
Where do I state that I support the Iranian regime.
Let me get this straight some how the intent of a message can be received via the MIS INTERPRETED MESSAGE - are we on the same page here because i think you just stated you get get the intent of a message via the wrong message....and even if the message were correct both the MIS INTERPRETED message and the "correct" message have the same meaning? Not sure if languages work like that sorry .
Last edited by Fen321 (2007-04-11 12:49:43)