weamo8
Member
+50|6891|USA

LawJik wrote:

Its that annoying righthandfork guy. He joined on April 5th (2 days ago), and has made 3 repetitive and close minded,  evolution v. creationism topics.

Evolution can’t explain human achievement
A Conversation between a Darwinist and a Creationist
Atheism is illogical

Hardly debate topics, obviously you aren't going to change your opinion righthandfork, your below the level of debate-able. Just Stop.

The ONLY posts this guy has, are on the 3 religion topics he started...

Go to a religion forum you creationism missionary..
He is close-minded?  I find the guy interesting, so I have been following his topics.  None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic.  You all throw your hands in the air and yell "OMFG religio-magic boy!  Your so dumb!"

If he is so wrong, why don't one of you point out the flaw in his logic.  Attack his logic, not his beliefs.  (And posting wikipedia links that say "evolution in FACT" shows you are not even looking at his arguments.)

I honestly didnt realize how shitty you all are at arguing until he showed up.
jonsimon
Member
+224|6944

weamo8 wrote:

LawJik wrote:

Its that annoying righthandfork guy. He joined on April 5th (2 days ago), and has made 3 repetitive and close minded,  evolution v. creationism topics.

Evolution can’t explain human achievement
A Conversation between a Darwinist and a Creationist
Atheism is illogical

Hardly debate topics, obviously you aren't going to change your opinion righthandfork, your below the level of debate-able. Just Stop.

The ONLY posts this guy has, are on the 3 religion topics he started...

Go to a religion forum you creationism missionary..
He is close-minded?  I find the guy interesting, so I have been following his topics.  None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic.  You all throw your hands in the air and yell "OMFG religio-magic boy!  Your so dumb!"

If he is so wrong, why don't one of you point out the flaw in his logic.  Attack his logic, not his beliefs.  (And posting wikipedia links that say "evolution in FACT" shows you are not even looking at his arguments.)

I honestly didnt realize how shitty you all are at arguing until he showed up.
Actually, people have argued with them, and just stating "None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic." does not make it true.
Spark
liquid fluoride thorium reactor
+874|7123|Canberra, AUS
Attack his logic, not his beliefs.
*blinks*

Have you been reading the threads?
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
Ubersturmbannfuhrer
I am a fucking homosexual
+211|7055|Parainen, Finland
I like his idea!!!!
We have discussed it it many ways already....
Off course, if the case is interesting....
theelviscerator
Member
+19|6737
Yes its funny to hear the pot calling out the potmaker.
AllmightyOz
Member
+50|6935|United States - Ohio
i believe an ape created us all. bigfoot. he is your god, bow down and respect.
Ubersturmbannfuhrer
I am a fucking homosexual
+211|7055|Parainen, Finland

AllmightyOz wrote:

i believe an ape created us all. bigfoot. he is your god, bow down and respect.
Amen!!!
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6854|North Carolina

Deadmonkiefart wrote:

To all of you aetheists out there, how can you not believe that there is some type of divine somthing out there?  Just look aroun you!  I find it hard to believe that the creation of the universe was just a random accident.
The existence of a divine being is very possible, but it is very unlikely that humans can accurately determine what this being is really like.

Thus, religion is mostly futile...  We try to explain the divine in human terms, which seems to defeat the purpose of divinity itself.

First of all, if some being exists that is omnipotent, then why does it need to be worshipped?

More religious people need to ask themselves why they need to worship a being or beings that are so vastly more powerful than us.  They can exist quite well enough without our attention, if they really exist in the first place.

Religion is most often a tool to control people with.  The extremely formalized hierarchies of some religions (like the Catholic Church) are the most blatant examples of this.  Why not just think for yourself and answer only to the logic your mind dictates?

Last edited by Turquoise (2007-04-08 01:31:54)

I.M.I Militant
We Are Not Alone In Here
+297|7168|Melbourne, Australia
Stop It.. Because Science Is Right Gtfo
Ajax_the_Great1
Dropped on request
+206|7095
Just ignore the religious threads then. I usually do.
Ice Cold Killa
Member
+26|6892|Perth, W.A, Australia.
you just told people not to make new topics about scinece vs religion and then you actually did it yourself... nice logic there.
Fenix14
scout rush kekeke ^___^
+116|7005|Brisbane, Aus

it's a legitamate topic if people have diffrent views on it.

besides threads about not making threads about (whatever topic here) don't work unless by mods.
PureFodder
Member
+225|6734

weamo8 wrote:

None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic.  You all throw your hands in the air and yell "OMFG religio-magic boy!  Your so dumb!"

If he is so wrong, why don't one of you point out the flaw in his logic.  Attack his logic, not his beliefs.  (And posting wikipedia links that say "evolution in FACT" shows you are not even looking at his arguments.)

I honestly didnt realize how shitty you all are at arguing until he showed up.
Have you been reading some kind of parallel universe version of those threads in which Fork Boy didn't have all his logical arguements ripped in to tiny shreads?

If his beliefs are based on what he claims is logic, and people find errors with his logic, that's his fault, not everyone elses.
KylieTastic
Games, Girls, Guinness
+85|6901|Cambridge, UK

jonsimon wrote:

weamo8 wrote:

LawJik wrote:

Its that annoying righthandfork guy. He joined on April 5th (2 days ago), and has made 3 repetitive and close minded,  evolution v. creationism topics.

Evolution can’t explain human achievement
A Conversation between a Darwinist and a Creationist
Atheism is illogical

Hardly debate topics, obviously you aren't going to change your opinion righthandfork, your below the level of debate-able. Just Stop.

The ONLY posts this guy has, are on the 3 religion topics he started...

Go to a religion forum you creationism missionary..
He is close-minded?  I find the guy interesting, so I have been following his topics.  None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic.  You all throw your hands in the air and yell "OMFG religio-magic boy!  Your so dumb!"

If he is so wrong, why don't one of you point out the flaw in his logic.  Attack his logic, not his beliefs.  (And posting wikipedia links that say "evolution in FACT" shows you are not even looking at his arguments.)

I honestly didnt realize how shitty you all are at arguing until he showed up.
Actually, people have argued with them, and just stating "None of you have even begun to try to argue against his logic." does not make it true.
QFT
Stormscythe
Aiming for the head
+88|6998|EUtopia | Austria
Science, Religion and One Common Purpose

Ever since people have been able to realize their existence actively, they’ve been doing some kind of research, in order to unfold the secrets of life. For millennia, the most common beliefs had been based on higher authorities, like various gods and natural spirits – this changed, however, when scholars and scientists were not satisfied with the assumption that our earth played a cen-tral part in the universe any longer.
Obviously, these “revolutions” only took place in civilized cultures (almost surprisingly the majority of them was created and lead by sovereign rulers, among them pharaohs and emperors), whereas the lesser civilized ones, consisting of nomad tribes and rather primitive communities, tended to fear fate and other only vaguely definable circumstances above everything else. Nonetheless, also in the higher developed cultures, one would never dare to act against any god’s or goddess’ will, against those transcendent beings that did not belong to the very world we know directly and yet influenced it. Whether it was only their task to move sun, moon and stars or whether they were them themselves, the movement of these across the firmament was something that made people dependent on them. Therefore, it is very interesting to see that especially astronomy always had been an issue, for when it came to verification and falsification of conceptions of the world. So to say, scientists did not solely question the words of their rulers by investigating these, they also questioned the highest available authorities, possibly with the intention to discover or even produce new ones.
Today it has become common thought that science and religion are inherently in conflict, and although they convey opposed positions at times, religion has also very often stimulated the development of science. On the quest for the sense of life itself, mankind simply seems to have developed different methods to find it, among them science and religion. Thus, these two, separated by whatever there might be, still follow one common purpose: Explaining the world in all its peculiarities, and thus explaining life itself.

Just my 2 • 10³ cents
G3|Genius
Pope of BF2s
+355|7075|Sea to globally-cooled sea
who gave me karma?  I'll karma you back!    and thank you for appreciating my post.  I was thinking nobody actually read it.

-Genius
Pernicious544
Zee Tank Skank
+80|7149|MoVal So-Cal
I was going to type something long (got about halfway done with it too) when I realized that i could sum it up in about 2 lines.


Religion is for insecure dip shits that dont realize the bible is a FAIRY TALE written by Jewish people (zing!) and uses many tall tales from earlier religions and claims it as its own. Noah&the flood for example were taken from a greek story.
G3|Genius
Pope of BF2s
+355|7075|Sea to globally-cooled sea
you're entitled to feel that way, but why be so inflamatory?  Your hostility detracts from your credibility.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard