BF2S Forums BF2s Sig Battles I - Signature 12 VS Signature 3

Signature 12 reminds me of an emo, so I voted for sig 3.

On sig 3 that much red colour is messing the image up (what I think)  so 12 here

blademaster wrote:

yeah 3 the guy looks like he is going to kill everyone here on bf2s

I like the colours in 12, even if it is of a whored style. :p

trois

3 (three) (trois) (tres) (etc, etc.)

12 should be owning! What is wrong with you people? Can you not tell decency?

Bah, what's the point...

Ryan wrote:

FFLink13 wrote:

12 should be owning! What is wrong with you people? Can you not tell decency?

Bah, what's the point...

But its... its.... EMO!

but 3 sucks.

FFLink13 wrote:

12 should be owning! What is wrong with you people? Can you not tell decency?

Bah, what's the point...

I know what you mean....

12 just looks better

MDFSpacePhantom wrote:

I have see some thing in these SiG battles, that in 50 % of these SiG battles the SiG the should winning is not like in this on 12 should be winning but it's not. Why? & no it's not mine....

people think its "emo" which is a lame excuse, because it is clearly better. aside from this one i think all the other ones are pretty right on, although i assume youre thinking of 2vs14 for obvious reasons...

MDFSpacePhantom wrote:

I'm not thinking about 2vs14, I'm talking about this one and 9 VS 1. SiG 1 should have won that one....

i dunno. i dont think either were that great. i liked where sig1 was going, but the shape was just aweful. 9 was good, just way too big. a close call in my opinion. this however, should have been a 'no contest'.

Last edited by Omnideath (2007-04-04 01:28:31)