If I wanted to make a cartoon and air it at 9am on Saturday morning on local television, full of swear words and sexual acts, you would be ok with that?TrollmeaT wrote:
If any side is censored then how can you form an objective view about it.usmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure about that.TrollmeaT wrote:
Censorship is wrong in any form.
I'm sure moderate Muslims won't act like extremists coz they are offended. But, we know what extremists can do, then why should we offend Muslims, when it's a time of crisis for the Middle East, and a lot of people's too sensitive about it?Turquoise wrote:
Good point, but moderates should be secure enough in their beliefs to not behave as extremists when offended.sergeriver wrote:
Agreed. But the video is offensive to all Muslims, the moderate and the extremist as well.Turquoise wrote:
Maybe so, but I would actually argue that the way to lessen extremism is to show the moderates that we aren't going to tolerate the actions of their fundamentalists. Basically, we need to make it in the best interests of moderates to eliminate extremists on their own terms.
Otherwise, if we just keep treating Muslims like short-tempered psychos, then more and more of them will act like them. Being politically correct only affirms extremism.
As others have mentioned, clips offensive to Christians have been allowed on Youtube, and the moderate Christians seem to have handled it well. Why not expect the same from Muslims?
Did you just read the last sentence? It is the idea that we should shut ourselves down and submit to Islam in order to maintain peace that promotes taking to the streets and rioting.sergeriver wrote:
Now you compare my viewpoint to the Muslim extremists views?Kmarion wrote:
Wow I expected more from you Serge. You are sitting here talking about the oppression of the Lebanese and at the same time suggesting an opposing view exercising freedom of expression be banished. Christians wouldn't be happy of course but they should respect everyones right to protest. It's ideas like that cause people to die over a cartoon.sergeriver wrote:
I really think that was pretty offensive to Islam. How would Christians feel if you'd make a similar video talking about the Old Testament?
I support freedom of speech, but in times like these, do you really think it's OK to offend Muslims? Aren't we trying to make the difference by being better than extremists?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Ok, now you compare submission to respect. They are different things my friend. Sorry, but I think you are confused.Kmarion wrote:
Did you just read the last sentence? It is the idea that we should shut ourselves down and submit to Islam in order to maintain peace that promotes taking to the streets and rioting.sergeriver wrote:
Now you compare my viewpoint to the Muslim extremists views?Kmarion wrote:
Wow I expected more from you Serge. You are sitting here talking about the oppression of the Lebanese and at the same time suggesting an opposing view exercising freedom of expression be banished. Christians wouldn't be happy of course but they should respect everyones right to protest. It's ideas like that cause people to die over a cartoon.
I support freedom of speech, but in times like these, do you really think it's OK to offend Muslims? Aren't we trying to make the difference by being better than extremists?
I would be... but then again, I think that TV should be completely regulated by customers, not the government.usmarine2007 wrote:
If I wanted to make a cartoon and air it at 9am on Saturday morning on local television, full of swear words and sexual acts, you would be ok with that?TrollmeaT wrote:
If any side is censored then how can you form an objective view about it.usmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure about that.
Because they'll become less sensitive if they're used to being offended.sergeriver wrote:
I'm sure moderate Muslims won't act like extremists coz they are offended. But, we know what extremists can do, then why should we offend Muslims, when it's a time of crisis for the Middle East, and a lot of people's too sensitive about it?Turquoise wrote:
Good point, but moderates should be secure enough in their beliefs to not behave as extremists when offended.sergeriver wrote:
Agreed. But the video is offensive to all Muslims, the moderate and the extremist as well.
As others have mentioned, clips offensive to Christians have been allowed on Youtube, and the moderate Christians seem to have handled it well. Why not expect the same from Muslims?
Look at most American Christians. They tend to be pretty thick-skinned when it comes to religious criticism. This is a good thing, because it's a sign of maturity.
Granted, some Christians (like the members of the American Family Association) are whiny douches.
You don't have to not respect something in order to question it and that's all he did. But let lets go ahead and take it down another notch. Do you think all those anti-Israel videos you enjoy posting are respectful?sergeriver wrote:
Ok, now you compare submission to respect. They are different things my friend. Sorry, but I think you are confused.Kmarion wrote:
Did you just read the last sentence? It is the idea that we should shut ourselves down and submit to Islam in order to maintain peace that promotes taking to the streets and rioting.sergeriver wrote:
Now you compare my viewpoint to the Muslim extremists views?
I support freedom of speech, but in times like these, do you really think it's OK to offend Muslims? Aren't we trying to make the difference by being better than extremists?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I'm not saying "don't criticize Muslim extremists", I'm saying "let's show respect for any religion, including Islam and Christianism". Look, Islam is on the spot right now, because of all the troubles with Muslim extremists, and they are a bit sensitive about their religion. Why should we criticize their beliefs? We should criticize the extremists, not the whole Muslim community.Turquoise wrote:
Because they'll become less sensitive if they're used to being offended.sergeriver wrote:
I'm sure moderate Muslims won't act like extremists coz they are offended. But, we know what extremists can do, then why should we offend Muslims, when it's a time of crisis for the Middle East, and a lot of people's too sensitive about it?Turquoise wrote:
Good point, but moderates should be secure enough in their beliefs to not behave as extremists when offended.
As others have mentioned, clips offensive to Christians have been allowed on Youtube, and the moderate Christians seem to have handled it well. Why not expect the same from Muslims?
Look at most American Christians. They tend to be pretty thick-skinned when it comes to religious criticism. This is a good thing, because it's a sign of maturity.
Granted, some Christians (like the members of the American Family Association) are whiny douches.
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.Kmarion wrote:
You don't have to not respect something in order to question it and that's all he did. But let lets go ahead and take it down another notch. Do you think all those anti-Israel videos you enjoy posting are respectful?sergeriver wrote:
Ok, now you compare submission to respect. They are different things my friend. Sorry, but I think you are confused.Kmarion wrote:
Did you just read the last sentence? It is the idea that we should shut ourselves down and submit to Islam in order to maintain peace that promotes taking to the streets and rioting.
I know what you mean, but again, I would say much of these problems result from criticism being silenced within the Islamic communities. Many Islamic nations are oppressive, and the people aren't allowed a healthy atmosphere of religious discussion. If this means they get offended by our observations, then so be it.sergeriver wrote:
I'm not saying "don't criticize Muslim extremists", I'm saying "let's show respect for any religion, including Islam and Christianism". Look, Islam is on the spot right now, because of all the troubles with Muslim extremists, and they are a bit sensitive about their religion. Why should we criticize their beliefs? We should criticize the extremists, not the whole Muslim community.
In my humble opinion, they need to be criticized more, because they obviously haven't done enough to curb their own religious problems. I know they're sensitive about their religion, but they need to get over themselves. We don't afford extra congeniality to any other religion, so why should they be given it?
Islam in and of itself has many problems as well. You even posted that clip of the Syrian ex-Muslim a few days ago. Wafa Sultan is the kind of person that they need more of in the Middle East. She had to flee her native country to express herself among other things.
If the Middle East doesn't want the freedom of speech, that's fine. If they want to curb our own freedom of speech, they can go fuck themselves.
I know I'm harsh about this topic, but you have to be. You can't give in to these people, because they'll try to run your life if you do.
I though the issue was respect. More importantly respecting someones opinion no matter what the issue. I must say I am surprised at the lengths you suggest we go for appeasement. I don't care if it's religion, politics, or science... no one should be told they do not have the right to express themselves, especially coming from youtube.sergeriver wrote:
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.Kmarion wrote:
You don't have to not respect something in order to question it and that's all he did. But let lets go ahead and take it down another notch. Do you think all those anti-Israel videos you enjoy posting are respectful?sergeriver wrote:
Ok, now you compare submission to respect. They are different things my friend. Sorry, but I think you are confused.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
I agree... but I think the only time we should curb expression is when those Fred Phelps assholes protest military funerals. Those people should be imprisoned.Kmarion wrote:
I though the issue was respect. More importantly respecting someones opinion no matter what the issue. I must say I am surprised at the lengths you suggest we go for appeasement. I don't care if it's religion, politics, or science... no one should be told they do not have the right to express themselves, especially coming from youtube.sergeriver wrote:
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.Kmarion wrote:
You don't have to not respect something in order to question it and that's all he did. But let lets go ahead and take it down another notch. Do you think all those anti-Israel videos you enjoy posting are respectful?
We both think Muslims need to change a lot of things. That woman is the example they can criticize their beliefs. But that's their job. We shouldn't tell them "your Religion sucks". We should work to help them understand we are not against Islam, but against extremists. I agree with most of your words, but I'm a bit more cautious when talking about their Religion. We all need to understand their Religion is not worse than any other Religion. What they need to do is to punish those who do bad things in the name of that Religion.Turquoise wrote:
I know what you mean, but again, I would say much of these problems result from criticism being silenced within the Islamic communities. Many Islamic nations are oppressive, and the people aren't allowed a healthy atmosphere of religious discussion. If this means they get offended by our observations, then so be it.sergeriver wrote:
I'm not saying "don't criticize Muslim extremists", I'm saying "let's show respect for any religion, including Islam and Christianism". Look, Islam is on the spot right now, because of all the troubles with Muslim extremists, and they are a bit sensitive about their religion. Why should we criticize their beliefs? We should criticize the extremists, not the whole Muslim community.
In my humble opinion, they need to be criticized more, because they obviously haven't done enough to curb their own religious problems. I know they're sensitive about their religion, but they need to get over themselves. We don't afford extra congeniality to any other religion, so why should they be given it?
Islam in and of itself has many problems as well. You even posted that clip of the Syrian ex-Muslim a few days ago. Wafa Sultan is the kind of person that they need more of in the Middle East. She had to flee her native country to express herself among other things.
If the Middle East doesn't want the freedom of speech, that's fine. If they want to curb our own freedom of speech, they can go fuck themselves.
I know I'm harsh about this topic, but you have to be. You can't give in to these people, because they'll try to run your life if you do.
I agree with you for the most part. However, I would argue that Islam is currently the most destructive of the world's major religions.sergeriver wrote:
We both think Muslims need to change a lot of things. That woman is the example they can criticize their beliefs. But that's their job. We shouldn't tell them "your Religion sucks". We should work to help them understand we are not against Islam, but against extremists. I agree with most of your words, but I'm a bit more cautious when talking about their Religion. We all need to understand their Religion is not worse than any other Religion. What they need to do is to punish those who do bad things in the name of that Religion.
A thousand years ago, Christianity was. Islam needs a Reformation.
Youtube is a private company, they are free to ban whoever they want. Pretty much like this forum is.Kmarion wrote:
I though the issue was respect. More importantly respecting someones opinion no matter what the issue. I must say I am surprised at the lengths you suggest we go for appeasement. I don't care if it's religion, politics, or science... no one should be told they do not have the right to express themselves, especially coming from youtube.sergeriver wrote:
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.Kmarion wrote:
You don't have to not respect something in order to question it and that's all he did. But let lets go ahead and take it down another notch. Do you think all those anti-Israel videos you enjoy posting are respectful?
I said that in the OP. It doesn't mean it is right.sergeriver wrote:
Youtube is a private company, they are free to ban whoever they want. Pretty much like this forum is.Kmarion wrote:
I though the issue was respect. More importantly respecting someones opinion no matter what the issue. I must say I am surprised at the lengths you suggest we go for appeasement. I don't care if it's religion, politics, or science... no one should be told they do not have the right to express themselves, especially coming from youtube.sergeriver wrote:
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Let's hope they won't have an Inquisition.Turquoise wrote:
I agree with you for the most part. However, I would argue that Islam is currently the most destructive of the world's major religions.sergeriver wrote:
We both think Muslims need to change a lot of things. That woman is the example they can criticize their beliefs. But that's their job. We shouldn't tell them "your Religion sucks". We should work to help them understand we are not against Islam, but against extremists. I agree with most of your words, but I'm a bit more cautious when talking about their Religion. We all need to understand their Religion is not worse than any other Religion. What they need to do is to punish those who do bad things in the name of that Religion.
A thousand years ago, Christianity was. Islam needs a Reformation.
In yet more proof of Godwin's Law, I have but one thing to contribute. The Nazi's were a party too. They did some good things for some people in their country. That doesn't mean they're good.sergeriver wrote:
Hezbollah is a party. Hezbollah did a lot of things to help the people in need in Lebanon. They also harbor terrorists, which is very wrong. But what Israel does can be called terrorism too. The difference is Hezbollah throws rocks and homemade missiles and Israel has the 4th largest army in the World.Turquoise wrote:
Good point, but it looks like Lebanon is now festering with extremists. If anyone won that battle, it was Hezbollah.sergeriver wrote:
1000 civilians dead vs. 2 kidnapped soldiers...not much debate there.
I hate to say it, but I think Israel would have been better off invading and occupying Lebanon. They never should have pulled out of Lebanon a few years ago, because it's obvious that Lebanon is incapable of running things without terrorists hijacking the government.
Very true, but I would say that they are sending the wrong message in doing so....sergeriver wrote:
Youtube is a private company, they are free to ban whoever they want. Pretty much like this forum is.Kmarion wrote:
I though the issue was respect. More importantly respecting someones opinion no matter what the issue. I must say I am surprised at the lengths you suggest we go for appeasement. I don't care if it's religion, politics, or science... no one should be told they do not have the right to express themselves, especially coming from youtube.sergeriver wrote:
I don't enjoy posting 'em. I post videos criticizing the terrorist government of Israel. I never posted a video against Judaism. Do you see the difference? Politics and Religion.
LOL... true... You might be able to say that we're currently witnessing a miniature one in Iraq right now.sergeriver wrote:
Let's hope they won't have an Inquisition.Turquoise wrote:
I agree with you for the most part. However, I would argue that Islam is currently the most destructive of the world's major religions.sergeriver wrote:
We both think Muslims need to change a lot of things. That woman is the example they can criticize their beliefs. But that's their job. We shouldn't tell them "your Religion sucks". We should work to help them understand we are not against Islam, but against extremists. I agree with most of your words, but I'm a bit more cautious when talking about their Religion. We all need to understand their Religion is not worse than any other Religion. What they need to do is to punish those who do bad things in the name of that Religion.
A thousand years ago, Christianity was. Islam needs a Reformation.
Its possible that it could happen all they need to do is have a warning before the show.usmarine2007 wrote:
If I wanted to make a cartoon and air it at 9am on Saturday morning on local television, full of swear words and sexual acts, you would be ok with that?TrollmeaT wrote:
If any side is censored then how can you form an objective view about it.usmarine2007 wrote:
Not sure about that.
Hitler killed millions and he was a Genocide. Hezbollah has many extremists in its lines, but it also has many moderate people. They killed a few hundreds against the thousands that Israel killed. Both sides are very wrong.blisteringsilence wrote:
In yet more proof of Godwin's Law, I have but one thing to contribute. The Nazi's were a party too. They did some good things for some people in their country. That doesn't mean they're good.sergeriver wrote:
Hezbollah is a party. Hezbollah did a lot of things to help the people in need in Lebanon. They also harbor terrorists, which is very wrong. But what Israel does can be called terrorism too. The difference is Hezbollah throws rocks and homemade missiles and Israel has the 4th largest army in the World.Turquoise wrote:
Good point, but it looks like Lebanon is now festering with extremists. If anyone won that battle, it was Hezbollah.
I hate to say it, but I think Israel would have been better off invading and occupying Lebanon. They never should have pulled out of Lebanon a few years ago, because it's obvious that Lebanon is incapable of running things without terrorists hijacking the government.
Last edited by sergeriver (2007-03-18 11:41:20)
Yes, but that will end when the country splits into 3.Turquoise wrote:
LOL... true... You might be able to say that we're currently witnessing a miniature one in Iraq right now.sergeriver wrote:
Let's hope they won't have an Inquisition.Turquoise wrote:
I agree with you for the most part. However, I would argue that Islam is currently the most destructive of the world's major religions.
A thousand years ago, Christianity was. Islam needs a Reformation.
Last edited by sergeriver (2007-03-18 11:43:45)
It is true that not all Hezbollah members are murderers, but neither were all Nazies. Most of the German people had no knowledge of the Holocaust, and few Nazi soldiers knew much about it either.sergeriver wrote:
Hitler killed millions and he was a Genocide. Hezbollah has many extremists in its lines, but it also has many moderate people. They killed a few hundreds against the thousands that Israel killed. Both sides are very wrong.blisteringsilence wrote:
In yet more proof of Godwin's Law, I have but one thing to contribute. The Nazi's were a party too. They did some good things for some people in their country. That doesn't mean they're good.sergeriver wrote:
Hezbollah is a party. Hezbollah did a lot of things to help the people in need in Lebanon. They also harbor terrorists, which is very wrong. But what Israel does can be called terrorism too. The difference is Hezbollah throws rocks and homemade missiles and Israel has the 4th largest army in the World.
Granted, it doesn't make their cause any better knowing this. I would say Hezbollah is just as hateful as the Nazies when it comes to their ideology towards Israel.
I used to believe that, but I'm starting to think these people are going to continue dying no matter what until a civil war breaks out and then a stable but oppressive government reigns again.sergeriver wrote:
Yes, but that will end when the country splits into 3.Turquoise wrote:
LOL... true... You might be able to say that we're currently witnessing a miniature one in Iraq right now.sergeriver wrote:
Let's hope they won't have an Inquisition.
Last edited by Turquoise (2007-03-18 11:52:15)