umm this site is under review now...look wat u guys have done!!!
http://www.sfu.ca/casr/101-tac50.htm
http://www.sfu.ca/casr/101-tac50.htm
on a bolt action?Burning_Monkey wrote:
Yeah. But the recoil is less and than means better follow up shots.sinir wrote:
The version with the magazine in front of the trigger is like 6 feet long lol.
Remember Battlefield 2 is a game. If you got shot with a 50 cal round, you would be down on the ground. 50 cal shots have been known to kill people in one shot to appendages.karmon wrote:
1) Could the bullpup configuration of the M95 mean a weaker overall weapon, thus explaining the inability for the M95 to kill with one body shot?
2) The M82A1 is a semi-automatic rifle? What? That is ludicrous.
Last edited by freebirdpat (2005-10-31 14:50:08)
Your thinking of the M82A1 vs M95/M90crusaderop50 wrote:
strange that the M95 sniper rifle in the game that the cartridge is on the back of the rifle not in front of the trigger.
Last edited by SilentBob (2005-10-31 20:27:54)
Nope.rEdTe@M wrote:
There are two types of M95's the semi auto and the bolt action the semi auto has the loading in front of the trigger and the bolt action has the loading in the back.
The version in BF2 is the bolt action one.
There you go let the 14 year old answer all your questions.
thats the m82 with the magazine in front of trigger.. also that one is semi auto.. not bolt action.. its no typo the m95 is a socom version of the m82.crusaderop50 wrote:
strange that the M95 sniper rifle in the game that the cartridge is on the back of the rifle not in front of the trigger.
That rifle has nothing to do with the M95 or M82.
So? It's still cool looking sniper_j5689_ wrote:
That rifle has nothing to do with the M95 or M82.
So? It's still cool looking sniper_j5689_ wrote:
That rifle has nothing to do with the M95 or M82.
So? It's still cool looking sniper_j5689_ wrote:
That rifle has nothing to do with the M95 or M82.
1) A bullpup configuration does not make a rifle weaker. It allows the gun to be more compact while keeping the barrel length at a longer length. This has no bearing on the damage or stopping power of the M95's round.karmon wrote:
1) Could the bullpup configuration of the M95 mean a weaker overall weapon, thus explaining the inability for the M95 to kill with one body shot?
2) The M82A1 is a semi-automatic rifle? What? That is ludicrous.
its called a muzzle break i got one on my hunting rifle its so you dont see the flashkilroy0097 wrote:
I don't think its a silencer honestly. Maybe its a muzzel warmer? Or its an additional flash/smoke suppressor? But I really don't thinkits actually a silencer at least I hope not.Burning_Monkey wrote:
Why in the name of all that is Holy would you try and silence a 12.7mm rifle? That silencer can't be good for anything after a couple of shots...priznat wrote:
Or how bout this one: Macmillan Tac-50: http://www.sfu.ca/casr/101-tac50.htm
Set the record of confirmed kill at 2,430m.. Don't know if that has been passed yet, possibly.