simmy.uk
Member
+117|6681
Is BF2142 a better game? I have heard alot of gamers say they got bored of BF2142 very quickly after purcahsing it.
ProRacerNorm
Member
+6|6843
its only good playing with a good team or a clan
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6688|The Land of Scott Walker
Yes.  2142 is optimized for teamwork and so are the points.  I've had far better luck with squad teamwork in 2142 compared to BF2.  Plus, 2142 runs soooo much more smooth.
Inspect@hDeck
Member
+23|6669|Browntown
Yes of course, you don't have aircraft and armor raining down hellfire ontop of you every second, and it's more infantry based.
madmurre
I suspect something is amiss
+117|6953|Sweden
I prefer it cause of the more infantry based combat, I miss Wake and Jets from bf2 still.
Fuzzball_the_Shooter
The Photographer.
+81|6948|Central Valley,California
I got bored with it alot more. Just isn't the same.
Megalomatthew
Member
+6|6653
2142 is more friendly to the casual gamer.  You don't find yourself playing for 1000 hours to get high ranks.  On the other hand if you like to spent and ungodly amount of time on a single game so you can get ribbons and medals with no real reward points wise go for BF2.  They both have their individual strengths and weaknesses.
ghostgr
177th Field Artillery
+39|6984|In your head
2142 is much better. Better play period. BF2 just sucks and it seems that no matter where you go now there is nothing but cheaters/glitchers/whatever someone always seems to do alot of bullshit kills.
Superior Mind
(not macbeth)
+1,755|6936
When BF2 was the same age as 2142 (about five months old). I was way more happy with BF2. BF2 was better when it was still as young as 2142 is now.
Stingray24
Proud member of the vast right-wing conspiracy
+1,060|6688|The Land of Scott Walker
I agree with you, Superior.  However, since I played BF2 since release I remember the huge bugs that Bf2 had and how frustrating that could be at times.  I have yet to experience a bug in 2142 that really hurt gameplay for me.  For my individual experience, 2142 wins.
Andoura
Got loooollllll ?
+853|6882|Montreal, Qc, Canada

Fuzzball_the_Shooter wrote:

I got bored with it alot more. Just isn't the same.
same here
Delphy
Member
+45|6828|Bristol, UK
IMO BF2 is a lot better so far. 2142 is laggy as shit, and the aerial vehicles are pretty damn useless. Also it's quite BS how a tank dies from one shot in the back.
Zukabazuka
Member
+23|6929

Delphy wrote:

IMO BF2 is a lot better so far. 2142 is laggy as shit, and the aerial vehicles are pretty damn useless. Also it's quite BS how a tank dies from one shot in the back.
Why? The tanks engine is in the back and if that one goes kaboom you wont be driving for long. Aerial units now need some skills to handle good and someone who can aim with the secondary. I hear people say every noob can fly now, well yeah ofcourse its not that hard. But being able to pwn in it does require some more than being a noob.
Avantek
Banned
+7|6591|New York
Gunship is a very good weapon as long as there are no AA EMP whorers on the map... And yeah any noob can fly them takes no skill to fly it but it takes skill to get a lot of kills with it without dieing.
Auqakuh2213
Bianchi Whore.
+53|6912

Avantek wrote:

Gunship is a very good weapon as long as there are no AA EMP whorers on the map... And yeah any noob can fly them takes no skill to fly it but it takes skill to get a lot of kills with it without dieing.
AA EMP whorers? Omg teh AA EMP glitcherz hax noobz.
anuban
Member
+3|6594
2142 for me!  I enjoy the rank and unlock systems.  The pins are a nice addition as well. 

BF2 took way to long to rank up and unlock more weapons.
Sambuccashake
Member
+126|6854|Sweden
For the moment I'm all for 2142 even though I really enjoyed BF2 for a very long time.

I don't know why, I seem to do better in BF2142.
Since I was never that much of a vehicle guy in BF2 I like the fact that nothing is overpowered in BF2142.

(With the exception of the new otus+infantry sonar setup)
psH
Banned
+217|6627|Sydney
OH god, not ANOTHER one of these threads...
simmy.uk
Member
+117|6681
Do you not also have to install spyware when you play 2142?
Paco_the_Insane
Phorum Phantom
+244|6888|Ohio

simmy.uk wrote:

Do you not also have to install spyware when you play 2142?
I have yet to see an ingame ad.
Magius5.0
Member
+106|6625|UMass Amherst

Paco_the_Insane wrote:

simmy.uk wrote:

Do you not also have to install spyware when you play 2142?
I have yet to see an ingame ad.
They gave up--not enough money in it for them.

We, the gamers, win, Big Corporate EA (not Dice) lose.
Plisken
POE2 Addict For Life
+21|6827|Vic, Australia

Delphy wrote:

IMO BF2 is a lot better so far. 2142 is laggy as shit, and the aerial vehicles are pretty damn useless. Also it's quite BS how a tank dies from one shot in the back.
It was 1 shot kills to the back of tanks in Battlefield 1942 and Vietnam (I think) too.
If it is laggy, either upgrade your comp or find another server. I have found 2142 to be more graphic intensive than Bf2 because of the weather effects (snow etc) and because Bf2 didnt have a giant flying, moving aircraft carrier  that everyone (with a brain ) whores out to get 50 or so team work if the enemy are intent on destroying the guns for points of their own.

On Topic: Bf2142 > Bf2
zeidmaan
Member
+234|6658|Vienna

Project Reality >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BF2142>BF2

thats how I see it.
aj0404
It'll just be our little secret
+298|6593|Iowa...
project reality was fun for awhile and the sound effects are insanely cool,but the maps are just way too boring for me.80% of them are nothing but forests and hills.Al Basrah(sp?) was the only map i enjoyed.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard