EU has better sniper, mech, pistol and support. Pac has better assault,uniform,vehicles and engineer. So it is pretty even.
Poll
PAC or EU?
| Pac | 48% | 48% - 66 | ||||
| Eu | 21% | 21% - 29 | ||||
| I don't mind, i like them both. | 29% | 29% - 40 | ||||
| Total: 135 | ||||||
TheOneAndOnlyX wrote:
EU has better sniper, mech, pistol and support. Pac has better assault,uniform,vehicles and engineer. So it is pretty even.
Hmm....i replace that with the A8. Dunno why, but i just have more luck with it. And im used to the tirning barrel for BF2Magius5.0 wrote:
I'm a hover tank whore for life. When you can mow down every motherf**ker on the map with a single tank, you know you're that damn good.
Krylov>SCAR
Park>Morretti
Nektomata> Tiger
Nektomata>L5
L5>T39
Sheapard>Ystrebal
Talon>Doragon
Romanov>GroundHog
Hachimoto>Goliath
Bandit>Ocelot
Brianchi>Shuko
Sundik>Michelle
Torcoutte>Malkrov
As you can see the PAC win but not by much
Park>Morretti
Nektomata> Tiger
Nektomata>L5
L5>T39
Sheapard>Ystrebal
Talon>Doragon
Romanov>GroundHog
Hachimoto>Goliath
Bandit>Ocelot
Brianchi>Shuko
Sundik>Michelle
Torcoutte>Malkrov
As you can see the PAC win but not by much
Last edited by doctastrangelove1964 (2007-02-17 18:11:53)
Dont mind but I try harder for the win on EU :S
Martyn
Martyn
krylov, park 25, shuko (or w/e), awesome pistol hhmmmm
IMO: PAC has better titan (yay campers), EU has better tank, apc and gunship. I don't care about default weapons cuz I use Voss-LAR + Rockets...
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
What's different about the titans?[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
IMO: PAC has better titan (yay campers), ...
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Hmmm....everyone seems to like the Perierra. I personally love the Takao. Much better ROF, plus a scope of sorts, and no huge rotating chamber in the way. With the Takao, I can empty a whole clip into a EU soldier before he shoots 3 shots into me.
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
There a differant shape,this enables people to glitch on the PAC titan and kill everyone inside inluding titan gunners.fatherted13 wrote:
What's different about the titans?[69th_GFH]GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
IMO: PAC has better titan (yay campers), ...
I picked PAC. I always seem to end up on that team. I like the sniper rifle and smg better than the others
PAC just b/c of the fa-37 other wise it would be EU
If any of you actually think the Tiger is better than the Nektomata you must really suck at this game.
As someone once said:doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
If any of you actually think the Tiger is better than the Nektomata you must really suck at this game.
10% = the effect of a gun (super powerful gun or suckage)
20% = player skill
70% = situational (good/bad luck, better positioning, etc.)
Hover tanks are good at long range artillery blasting, provided you can land your shots on your target while moving (or fire, straffe, fire, straffe, and so on). Evasion and speed are their advantages, along with conservative use of their shielding. Against a walker, you can evade the missiles and land your shots more reliably. Traverses over any terrain relatively easily, and little loss of acceleration.
Tiger tank is better for CQC, and reacting QUICKLY to threats at close range. Their maneuvering is slightly better at close quarters as well, and isn't as restricted as the hover tank, which need to circle constantly to keep a bead on close targets. A more stable artillery platform, but more vulnerable at longer range since that chassis becomes a liability.
Nekomata>Tiger 1 pac
Krylov>Scar 2 pac
Prierre>Takao 1 EU
Dorogon>Talon 3 pac
Shuko>Bianchi 4 pac
Turcotte>Malkov 2 EU
Mitchell>Sudnik(Mitchell seems to go faster) 3 EU
Morretiti>Park 4 EU
Shepherd>Yosturb(however you spell it) 5 Eu
Bandit>Ocelot 6 EU
L5>T39 7 EU
Groundhog > Ramonov 8 EU
overall, EU has 8 advantages and Pac only has 4. I prefer EU.
Krylov>Scar 2 pac
Prierre>Takao 1 EU
Dorogon>Talon 3 pac
Shuko>Bianchi 4 pac
Turcotte>Malkov 2 EU
Mitchell>Sudnik(Mitchell seems to go faster) 3 EU
Morretiti>Park 4 EU
Shepherd>Yosturb(however you spell it) 5 Eu
Bandit>Ocelot 6 EU
L5>T39 7 EU
Groundhog > Ramonov 8 EU
overall, EU has 8 advantages and Pac only has 4. I prefer EU.
-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
PAC-Krylov
fatherted13 wrote:
The EU smg is better, IMHO, but eveything else is good for PAC.haffeysucks wrote:
PAC high points
- Nekomata
- Takao 20 Pistol
- Krylov AR(I personally don't like it, most do though)
- Doragon Gunship
- Malkov SMG
EU high points
- Bianchi LMG
- Moretti SR
- The APCs aren't so high off the ground, so they're a smaller target and harder to flip (don't ask)
IMO PAC is slightly better. Both are pretty balenced though.
I don't mind the army at all.
I would say it the other way round. Hard to place long-range shots with the Nekomata, cause it aint as stable as the A-8, but way more maneuverable so superiour in close quarters.Magius5.0 wrote:
As someone once said:doctastrangelove1964 wrote:
If any of you actually think the Tiger is better than the Nektomata you must really suck at this game.
10% = the effect of a gun (super powerful gun or suckage)
20% = player skill
70% = situational (good/bad luck, better positioning, etc.)
Hover tanks are good at long range artillery blasting, provided you can land your shots on your target while moving (or fire, straffe, fire, straffe, and so on). Evasion and speed are their advantages, along with conservative use of their shielding. Against a walker, you can evade the missiles and land your shots more reliably. Traverses over any terrain relatively easily, and little loss of acceleration.
Tiger tank is better for CQC, and reacting QUICKLY to threats at close range. Their maneuvering is slightly better at close quarters as well, and isn't as restricted as the hover tank, which need to circle constantly to keep a bead on close targets. A more stable artillery platform, but more vulnerable at longer range since that chassis becomes a liability.
Still I prefer the Tiger, as most of the EU weapons. They just look and sound cooler. PAC equipment is all plastic. Except for the Krylov of course .
Plus the L-5 Riesig > Bogatyr. And me <3 Riesig!
I don't mind either...
But the PAC Assault looks a little silly. Like something you'd see on Back to the Future Part 2.
But the PAC Assault looks a little silly. Like something you'd see on Back to the Future Part 2.
You mean the Hachimoto FAV?ZCaliber wrote:
I don't mind either...
But the PAC Assault looks a little silly. Like something you'd see on Back to the Future Part 2.
EU all day baby!
I like them both. But I think the PAC has an edge in the tank department. They should give more armor to the EU tank to balance out the manueverability edge that the PAC tank has.
-[Silver.Inc* wrote:
PAC-Krylov
I'd say a tie, overall PAC is better but EU has the Talon which is 5 times better than Dorogan.