Pages: 1 2
In defense of today's society, yesterday's society wasn't a treat. Neither was last week's, month's, year's, decade's, century's or millenium's.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
In defense of today's society, yesterday's society wasn't a treat. Neither was last week's, month's, year's, decade's, century's or millenium's.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
You didn't say anything of the sort, nor anything to the contrary. What I posted wasn't so much a jibe against you as a statement ultimately saying "more of the same".ThomasMorgan wrote:
...when did I say anything about society ever being better? All I said was that people see nothing wrong with today's society.
Stop inferring things and start reading/understanding my posts as I write them.
It wasn't so much directed toward you as it was directed toward the person who asked me a question comparing today's society to yesterday's. I should've quoted it, but when I started writing, your post hadn't shown up yet. My apologies.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
In defense of today's society, yesterday's society wasn't a treat. Neither was last week's, month's, year's, decade's, century's or millenium's.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.You didn't say anything of the sort, nor anything to the contrary. What I posted wasn't so much a jibe against you as a statement ultimately saying "more of the same".ThomasMorgan wrote:
...when did I say anything about society ever being better? All I said was that people see nothing wrong with today's society.
Stop inferring things and start reading/understanding my posts as I write them.
So stop inferring things and start reading/understanding posts.
np. The response just looked like it fit my post. Guilty of inferring, I guess.ThomasMorgan wrote:
It wasn't so much directed toward you as it was directed toward the person who asked me a question comparing today's society to yesterday's. I should've quoted it, but when I started writing, your post hadn't shown up yet. My apologies.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
unnamednewbie13 wrote:
In defense of today's society, yesterday's society wasn't a treat. Neither was last week's, month's, year's, decade's, century's or millenium's.You didn't say anything of the sort, nor anything to the contrary. What I posted wasn't so much a jibe against you as a statement ultimately saying "more of the same".ThomasMorgan wrote:
...when did I say anything about society ever being better? All I said was that people see nothing wrong with today's society.
Stop inferring things and start reading/understanding my posts as I write them.
So stop inferring things and start reading/understanding posts.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2007-02-16 07:24:50)
Yes because drowning peopleto see if they were witches was the right way to do it. Lets not forget fuedalistic torture chambers and Hillary Clinton.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
Perhaps TM's post should be reworded:deeznutz1245 wrote:
Yes because drowning peopleto see if they were witches was the right way to do it. Lets not forget fuedalistic torture chambers and Hillary Clinton.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
...so, what? Did you decide not to read the rest of the thread and figured you'd chime in with what you considered to be a comical satire about society?deeznutz1245 wrote:
Yes because drowning peopleto see if they were witches was the right way to do it. Lets not forget fuedalistic torture chambers and Hillary Clinton.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
I am learning from Bubalo. How am I doing so far?ThomasMorgan wrote:
...so, what? Did you decide not to read the rest of the thread and figured you'd chime in with what you considered to be a comical satire about society?deeznutz1245 wrote:
Yes because drowning peopleto see if they were witches was the right way to do it. Lets not forget fuedalistic torture chambers and Hillary Clinton.ThomasMorgan wrote:
...and people honestly don't see anything wrong with today's society.
And before you answer, yes, that is a rhetorical question.
One, it's Bubbalo, and two, I wouldn't know. Ask him.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I am learning from Bubalo. How am I doing so far?ThomasMorgan wrote:
...so, what? Did you decide not to read the rest of the thread and figured you'd chime in with what you considered to be a comical satire about society?deeznutz1245 wrote:
Yes because drowning peopleto see if they were witches was the right way to do it. Lets not forget fuedalistic torture chambers and Hillary Clinton.
And before you answer, yes, that is a rhetorical question.
...says the guy with that sig.Pubic wrote:
People are fucked up, more than ever, everywhere.
Last edited by MetalChont (2007-02-16 07:33:18)
That's what you get in a dog-eat-dog society.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/16/homeless.death.ap/index.html
WTF is wrong with people man. Jesus.
She may have been a prostitute, but no one deserves to die like this.
There is more efficient ways to rob someone. You have to be a cold mofo to set someone on fire. Thats mafia revenge type shit there.Pierre wrote:
That's what you get in a dog-eat-dog society.Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2007/LAW/02/16/homeless.death.ap/index.html
WTF is wrong with people man. Jesus.
She may have been a prostitute, but no one deserves to die like this.
"Every man for himself, and everything for me!"
Pages: 1 2