India, China, and Russia VS USA

2007-02-15 06:49:02

#1

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7089|USA

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/w … 386812.ece

Here is the first paragraph:

India, China and Russia account for 40 per cent of the world’s population, a fifth of its economy and more than half of its nuclear warheads. Now they appear to be forming a partnership to challenge the US-dominated world order that has prevailed since the end of the Cold War.

Are we headed for dark days and bright nights? Thoughts, comments, concerns?

2007-02-15 06:53:30

#2

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
and bright nights?

I'll comment once you explain what that means..............

Not being a smart-ass, I'm just too dumb to have a clue what you mean

2007-02-15 06:53:58

#3

usmarine2007: Banned; +374|6794|Columbus, Ohio

We are using old Russian nukes in our power plants to produce electricity. Not sure how much of a power they really are.

2007-02-15 06:56:29

#4

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7089|USA

Bubbalo wrote:
Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
and bright nights?
I'll comment once you explain what that means..............

Not being a smart-ass, I'm just too dumb to have a clue what you mean

Bombs bursting in mid-air type nights.

Its along shot to say this could lead to WWIII, but hearing those three countries in talks about our "World Order" is a bit scary.

2007-02-15 07:00:18

#5

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

we have allies too man. and india's population isn't a threat.

2007-02-15 07:01:27

#6

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

Aaaaaaaaaaaah!

IMHO, probably not. That is, for the US/China/Russia/India. The likelihood of the mainlands of any of them being invaded is slim to none.

Other nations, on the other hand, possibly. It depends on how it gets played out.

2007-02-15 07:04:16

#7

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

we need to worry about
iraq/afghanistan
iran
africa
china
korea

2007-02-15 07:05:40

#8

silo1180: The Farewell Tour; +79|6849|San Antonio, TX

I say step on up we could use the help! It would be a plus for the US to not have to spread it's military so thin.

IF we could depend on these countries to back-up the UN in hot spots, I think it would actually be good for the US. But could anyone of these countries sustain (economically) a long-term military presence outside of their own borders? Would they need to combine resources and/or militaries?

2007-02-15 07:06:08

#9

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we have allies too man.

Australia and Britain, atm.

And Israel, but if they lifted a finger to help someone else I think I'd die of shock.

2007-02-15 07:08:17

#10

TheDarkRaven: ATG's First Disciple; +263|7051|Birmingham, UK

Bubbalo wrote:
CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we have allies too man.
Australia and Britain, atm.

And Israel, but if they lifted a finger to help someone else I think I'd die of shock.

Probably the most acute summary of Israel's foreign policy I have ever read.

2007-02-15 07:08:48

#11

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

Bubbalo wrote:
CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we have allies too man.
Australia and Britain, atm.

And Israel, but if they lifted a finger to help someone else I think I'd die of shock.

haha ya.
canada too.

2007-02-15 07:10:52

#12

RDMC: Enemy Wheelbarrow Spotted..!!; +736|6991|Area 51

CoronadoSEAL wrote:
Bubbalo wrote:
CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we have allies too man.
Australia and Britain, atm.

And Israel, but if they lifted a finger to help someone else I think I'd die of shock.
haha ya.
canada too.

And the Netherlands too

2007-02-15 07:11:30

#13

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

The Canadian navy will save you?

Seriously, though, in terms of capability Australia and GB combined are a fraction of the strength of the US, couldn't even hold off one of the super powers mentioned. Your best bet would be Australia providing a distraction (being in/next to Asia) and GB using it's navy and air force to prevent the others from bringing their forces to bear. In fact, it might end up being counterproductive for the US by forcing them to defend their allies.

2007-02-15 07:13:04

#14

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7089|USA

CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we need to worry about
iraq/afghanistan
iran
africa
china
korea

Reading the article it sounds like these talks are happening to stunt any agression we may have towards Iran. Hypothetically, let's say we get tough with Iran, and these three come out and so, "Oh no you didn't", that would be quite the showdown.

2007-02-15 07:18:08

#15

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

true.
allies that wont get attacked (netherlands, canada, austria, britian before 9-11, etc) are just deterrents for major powers such as china. the anti-United States world will never be conventional anyway. they cannot match US conventional powers. that is why the hadjis are dressing up as women and pulling ak's. my brother, who is in the Air Force, just told me the other day that the F-15 is something like 21-0 while engaged in air to air combat overseas in the last few years. pretty rediculous. it is time to rely on our own unconventional forces. the best counter to a sniper is another sniper. fight fire with fire? (no im not suggesting taking massive innocent lives)

2007-02-15 07:19:26

#16

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

CoronadoSEAL wrote:
they cannot match US conventional powers

Currently they cannot do so on a global scale.

2007-02-15 07:19:56

#17

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we need to worry about
iraq/afghanistan
iran
africa
china
korea
Reading the article it sounds like these talks are happening to stunt any agression we may have towards Iran. Hypothetically, let's say we get tough with Iran, and these three come out and so, "Oh no you didn't", that would be quite the showdown.

iran would be committing utter suicide to nuke the US or any ally. Bush is just worried they might supply nuclear capability to terrorists.

2007-02-15 07:37:01

#18

Mason4Assassin444: retired; +552|7089|USA

CoronadoSEAL wrote:
Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
CoronadoSEAL wrote:
we need to worry about
iraq/afghanistan
iran
africa
china
korea
Reading the article it sounds like these talks are happening to stunt any agression we may have towards Iran. Hypothetically, let's say we get tough with Iran, and these three come out and so, "Oh no you didn't", that would be quite the showdown.
iran would be committing utter suicide to nuke the US or any ally. Bush is just worried they might supply nuclear capability to terrorists.

Agreed. Lets say we find evidence of Iran supplying nuclear material to terrorists, attempt to cut it off, and Russia, China, and India get involved and defend Iran. With some foreign countries visions of us being this fascist warlord globe trotting country, its almost like we used our last "cry wolf" dialogue with Iraq and now we could say anything and global powers will laugh at us. The way we handled the battle in Iraq, why would these big three believe us? Especially when they hold private stock in Irans dealings.

Worst case scenario I believe is these three plainly stating they will defend Iran from attacks.

All of this is hypothetically, but food for thought.

2007-02-15 07:38:37

#19

Fancy_Pollux: Connoisseur of Fine Wine; +1,306|7073

I don't see what point this would serve besides bringing about the apocalypse faster. That's really the only way such a conflict would end.

2007-02-15 07:43:51

#20

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

Uh, guys, the topic....................

2007-02-15 08:06:19

#21

ELITE-UK: Scratching my back; +170|6900|SHEFFIELD, ENGLAND

EUROPE, USA, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN. all will pwn the world if they try and take what we have away from us

2007-02-15 08:11:21

#22

smtt686: this is the best we can do?; +95|7058|USA

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article1386812.ece

Here is the first paragraph:

India, China and Russia account for 40 per cent of the world’s population, a fifth of its economy and more than half of its nuclear warheads. Now they appear to be forming a partnership to challenge the US-dominated world order that has prevailed since the end of the Cold War.

Are we headed for dark days and bright nights? Thoughts, comments, concerns?

what are they going to do, stop selling us vodka, cheap plastic trinkets and quit telemarketing calls?

all we will get from this is mutually assured destruction.

2007-02-15 08:13:16

#23

Bubbalo: The Lizzard; +541|6988

smtt686 wrote:
what are they going to do, stop selling us vodka, cheap plastic trinkets and quit telemarketing calls?

Maybe you should ask Europe how well their heaters are working................

Or try checking the labels on just about all of your clothing........................

2007-02-15 08:14:11

#24

BALTINS: ಠ_ಠ; +37|6913|Latvia

oh noez.. please no world war yet. Wait some 10 years.. I want to play some Crysis/Stalker/BF:BC before

2007-02-15 08:42:23

#25

CoronadoSEAL: pics or it didn't happen; +207|6944|USA

wwIII will be the apocalypse. i finally agree with pollux the biatch.

ever read the Bible? start on the last book if you are interested in nuclear war.

BF2S Forums India, China, and Russia VS USA

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Bubbalo wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

CoronadoSEAL wrote:

Mason4Assassin444 wrote:

smtt686 wrote:

Board footer