Again... if germany invades italy i expect the France coming for help , and they wouldn't be attackers.usmarine2007 wrote:
Will you people realize that the actual Iraqi want these idiots to stop this shit. Most insurgents are not Iraqi's. So, what foreign insurgents family is being attacked?PluggedValve wrote:
I have never met an american who wouldnt defend their family with a gun, yet they expect Iraqi's to be different. Hipocrits.
oh brother. THE IRAQIS DO NOT WANT THE INSURGENTS THERE SO AMERICANS CAN GIVE THEM THE HELP THEY NEED IN ORDER TO GET ON WITH THEIR LIVES. How do I know this? Guess?Kukulcan wrote:
Again... if germany invades italy i expect the France coming for help , and they wouldn't be attackers.usmarine2007 wrote:
Will you people realize that the actual Iraqi want these idiots to stop this shit. Most insurgents are not Iraqi's. So, what foreign insurgents family is being attacked?PluggedValve wrote:
I have never met an american who wouldnt defend their family with a gun, yet they expect Iraqi's to be different. Hipocrits.
The islamic league is a military pact by now.
Last edited by usmarine2007 (2007-02-01 11:31:00)
I don't know sniper , but if we speak of soldiers it wasn't much time ago i think.ShellShock.PwN wrote:
ok my whole point is a sniper is trained to shoot ENEMIES, there are some whack jobs out their that shoot civilians for what ever reason but im talking about warzones. if you are going to give 1 sniper credit for not hurting civilians then you must give them all credit. when was the last time u heard an american sniper shooting civilians in a warzone?Kukulcan wrote:
The flag in my sign speaks clearly on my originsShellShock.PwN wrote:
well hes saying hes not hurting any civilians, im sorry i didnt know he wasnt from iraq. My mistake. but even so would an american sniper shoot at civilians or troops?
...........because I enjoy quoting myself.deeznutz1245 wrote:
I will tell you why I hate you. You generalize our nation and say stupid, misinformed things. I have seen a lot of "all Americans" and "the problem with Americans is........". Wrong. We have dipshit politicians who we dont vote for but seem to get elected. They do not represent us the way you think they do. You havefailed to understand that and have insulted us as a nation, and as a people, when you are going off emotion and opinion. That does not mix well in a Debate. There are many people here who not enjoy some of Americas decisions and express it openly, however, they do not lump us all into that decision collectively like you have. That is why I hate You.
Ok you didn't read one of my precedent posts....deeznutz1245 wrote:
I will tell you why I hate you. You generalize our nation and say stupid, misinformed things. I have seen a lot of "all Americans" and "the problem with Americans is........". Wrong. We have dipshit politicians who we dont vote for but seem to get elected. They do not represent us the way you think they do. You havefailed to understand that and have insulted us as a nation, and as a people, when you are going off emotion and opinion. That does not mix well in a Debate. There are many people here who not enjoy some of Americas decisions and express it openly, however, they do not lump us all into that decision collectively like you have. That is why I hate You.Kukulcan wrote:
With you i mean some general people in this thread... many people indeed.usmarine2007 wrote:
I never called you a fag.
In an italian i opened the SAME 3AD .... i could link but how many of you speak the Ancient Language?
Useless to say that the reactions there were REALLY different.... i mean , no one insulted me or was prevented.
Is enough normal that american people hates me now... i'm speaking badly of your military and i say that i admire one of your enemies. But that's your ( not you ) problem..... i mean , if you wouldn't be american probably you'd be more rational on this question.
It was mine error to talk of this matter in a forum where there are many americans.
But they didn't even NEED HELP if you didn't invade Iraq before!! That's the point.usmarine2007 wrote:
oh brother. THE IRAQIS DO NOT WANT THE INSURGENTS THERE SO AMERICANS CAN GIVE THEM THE HELP THEY NEED IN ORDER TO GET ON WITH THEIR LIVES. How do I know this? Guess?Kukulcan wrote:
Again... if germany invades italy i expect the France coming for help , and they wouldn't be attackers.usmarine2007 wrote:
Will you people realize that the actual Iraqi want these idiots to stop this shit. Most insurgents are not Iraqi's. So, what foreign insurgents family is being attacked?
The islamic league is a military pact by now.
again this juba guy is a sniper is he not? ok so we are talking about snipers. give an american sniper a camera on his gun and see how many civilians he shoots. Just when you said i give him credit for not harming civilians it sounded like another "insurgent" sniper was shooting civilians. Sure regular troops shoot civilians, but how many civilians have died from ieds? im sure more have died from ieds then crossfire.Kukulcan wrote:
I don't know sniper , but if we speak of soldiers it wasn't much time ago i think.ShellShock.PwN wrote:
ok my whole point is a sniper is trained to shoot ENEMIES, there are some whack jobs out their that shoot civilians for what ever reason but im talking about warzones. if you are going to give 1 sniper credit for not hurting civilians then you must give them all credit. when was the last time u heard an american sniper shooting civilians in a warzone?Kukulcan wrote:
The flag in my sign speaks clearly on my origins
Besides... you are considered a world democracy , is normal that you seek global consense by not shooting civilians. This , instead , isn't normal in a force that seekes the destruction of USA as the Islamic army..... it values more credit i think if done by a muslim at war.
Last edited by ShellShock.PwN (2007-02-01 11:37:49)
So a serial killer who only murders rapists deserves more credit than a serial killer who murders innocent people? I am not saying that I wouldnt be shooting people if they invaded my country, because I would no matter how I was perceived by the enemy. What I am saying is this sniper is no different, and not only deserves no more credit, but should also get no credit at all.Kukulcan wrote:
I don't know sniper , but if we speak of soldiers it wasn't much time ago i think.ShellShock.PwN wrote:
ok my whole point is a sniper is trained to shoot ENEMIES, there are some whack jobs out their that shoot civilians for what ever reason but im talking about warzones. if you are going to give 1 sniper credit for not hurting civilians then you must give them all credit. when was the last time u heard an american sniper shooting civilians in a warzone?Kukulcan wrote:
The flag in my sign speaks clearly on my origins
Besides... you are considered a world democracy , is normal that you seek global consense by not shooting civilians. This , instead , isn't normal in a force that seekes the destruction of USA as the Islamic army..... it values more credit i think if done by a muslim at war.
Again, you should probably do a little research before trying to talk like an expert on the subject. (which you a obviously not)Kukulcan wrote:
Again .... reports of violent us miltary personnel are by far more frequent.deeznutz1245 wrote:
Oh no, then how do you explain this?Kukulcan wrote:
I never saw Italian or French or British soldiers doing that?
Or this? Idiot. Take your propoganda elsewhere.
Easy for you to say, last time I checked there were no rape rooms and mass ethnic killings in Italy.Kukulcan wrote:
Is normal that now they seek your help... i mean YOU are USA , they are some fancy rebel faction.... which help can they give?
Last edited by usmarine2007 (2007-02-01 11:37:42)
Does anyone here have a time machine? No? Thought so..Kukulcan wrote:
But they didn't even NEED HELP if you didn't invade Iraq before!! That's the point.usmarine2007 wrote:
oh brother. THE IRAQIS DO NOT WANT THE INSURGENTS THERE SO AMERICANS CAN GIVE THEM THE HELP THEY NEED IN ORDER TO GET ON WITH THEIR LIVES. How do I know this? Guess?Kukulcan wrote:
Again... if germany invades italy i expect the France coming for help , and they wouldn't be attackers.
The islamic league is a military pact by now.
Is normal that now they seek your help... i mean YOU are USA , they are some fancy rebel faction.... which help can they give?
Exactly. So his whole point is moot.PluggedValve wrote:
"Is this guy Iraqi? I bet American's would shoot the "invaders." But since a lot of these guys are not Iraqi's, who were they invaded by?"
Is this guy not Iraqi?? Proof please.
But this is the proof that i don't hate USA but what you're doing in IRAQ and their foreign politics , sounds simple to me.SgtHeihn wrote:
Well the funn thing is, he is posting on a American ran web site, he plays an American war game and his favorite show is House MD an American show.....
And what your doing is Anti-Propaganda of the United Sates??? That is just a STUPID comment.
Oh yeah those Juba videos are old, He is not real, its a propaganda thing.
Also, your saying if I came to Italy, with a sniper rifle, and only shot cops and military, it would be ok(aslong as I don't hit a civilian)
Last edited by Kukulcan (2007-02-01 11:41:50)
hhmmm....corrupt politicians (I think thats just about everywhere), women are treated like second class, restricted education, 3rd world technology, no tourism, men fucking donkeys, people wipe their asses with their bare left hand, no public services or facilities and corrupt murderous police on every block reporting to Hussein. Well shit, since they have oil they must be doing ok, right? You are right though, they didnt need any help.Kukulcan wrote:
But they didn't even NEED HELP if you didn't invade Iraq before!! That's the point.
Is normal that now they seek your help... i mean YOU are USA , they are some fancy rebel faction.... which help can they give?
The question of the 1 or 2 points was just a simple example you know...PluggedValve wrote:
"If we use this ratio on the American troop levels, this would mean that 220 different examples would need to be found in order to keep this ratio true (132,000 / 600 = 220). I can think of many 5 or ten examples, but 220 is quite a stetch. Also, keep in mind that the number of American troops reached a peak of 250,000....this would mean a staggering 417 different examples need to be produced. "
Good Point. Do you think its possible some incidents go unreported?? Probably. But good point anyway.
Don't do the ''saviour of the world'' .... the us started a war in iraq not to grant money or wellness to the civs.... us went there because iraq has got the black gold.deeznutz1245 wrote:
hhmmm....corrupt politicians (I think thats just about everywhere), women are treated like second class, restricted education, 3rd world technology, no tourism, men fucking donkeys, people wipe their asses with their bare left hand, no public services or facilities and corrupt murderous police on every block reporting to Hussein. Well shit, since they have oil they must be doing ok, right? You are right though, they didnt need any help.Kukulcan wrote:
But they didn't even NEED HELP if you didn't invade Iraq before!! That's the point.
Is normal that now they seek your help... i mean YOU are USA , they are some fancy rebel faction.... which help can they give?