did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.ELITE-UK wrote:
If i was prime minister, no offence but i would kick anyone who doesnt like other cultures out!!
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
That's outrageous. I'd have made sure to have a flag up for the world cup specifically because they banned it (I did anyway, but it wasn't banned where I was).ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.ELITE-UK wrote:
If i was prime minister, no offence but i would kick anyone who doesnt like other cultures out!!
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
no, it was in some gay ass rundown muslim area of the city, it was a local thing and was pretty lame and arrogant of them to even think that.Bertster7 wrote:
That's outrageous. I'd have made sure to have a flag up for the world cup specifically because they banned it (I did anyway, but it wasn't banned where I was).ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
I'm sure bans are instigated by paranoid PR departments for big business who don't want to risk offending a single person and thus potentially losing custom. I doubt that they actually discuss the issue with the people they think they are offending, and probably actually offend more people by not doing so. And I suspect a general public ban would actually be illegal.Bertster7 wrote:
That's outrageous. I'd have made sure to have a flag up for the world cup specifically because they banned it (I did anyway, but it wasn't banned where I was).ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
Very true. I have to say if a ban was imposed, I would have no fear whatsoever of getting in trouble for having an English flag up during the world cup - because I'm sure that such a ban is totally illegal.UON wrote:
I'm sure bans are instigated by paranoid PR departments for big business who don't want to risk offending a single person and thus potentially losing custom. I doubt that they actually discuss the issue with the people they think they are offending, and probably actually offend more people by not doing so. And I suspect a general public ban would actually be illegal.Bertster7 wrote:
That's outrageous. I'd have made sure to have a flag up for the world cup specifically because they banned it (I did anyway, but it wasn't banned where I was).ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!
I thought you were generalising a whole race based on a minority of complainers and made an incorrect assumption you were being prejudiced. I apologise.ELITE-UK wrote:
stuff.
That's total bullshit. I love how you think media spin is always the work of the ethnics.ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.ELITE-UK wrote:
If i was prime minister, no offence but i would kick anyone who doesnt like other cultures out!!
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
I've got a England Shirt bought it specially for the WC and i wear it every single time when England are playing. Godamn, you'll find me at Headingley watching England in test match cricket! (Heaven)
England flags are banned by the authorties/police because invariably as England fuck up against the Germans or Estonia the far right knobheads motivated by the sight of the George Cross go on a rampage hollering god save the Queen. Same concept used by the Aussies at a rock concert:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 285665.stm
Now this may not happen all the time, but no chances are taken and all eventualities are mitigated against.
Ever heard of the concept of 2 sides to every story? Now off with you back to the stats page and take those exclamation marks with you.
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-23 13:31:35)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
where do you get these stories from....ELITE-UK wrote:
no, it was in some gay ass rundown muslim area of the city, it was a local thing and was pretty lame and arrogant of them to even think that.Bertster7 wrote:
That's outrageous. I'd have made sure to have a flag up for the world cup specifically because they banned it (I did anyway, but it wasn't banned where I was).ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
send the buggers back (lol pheonix nights)
Left or Right?!ELITE-UK wrote:
your mum, when im sucking on her tit.m3thod wrote:
where do you get these stories from....ELITE-UK wrote:
no, it was in some gay ass rundown muslim area of the city, it was a local thing and was pretty lame and arrogant of them to even think that.
Last edited by m3thod (2007-01-23 13:40:41)
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.
That's ridiculous. Just because some dumbasses use the flag for racist purposes doesn't make the flag itself wrong. Besides, if people really want to display the Australian or English flag as a symbol of white pride or whatever, they should be able to do it as long as they're demonstrating nonviolently. I'm really surprised at how quickly other nations will ban things simply because someone may be offended. I guess it makes American political correctness look tame.m3thod wrote:
That's total bullshit. I love how you think media spin is always the work of the ethnics.ELITE-UK wrote:
did i say i hated other cultures, noob?? i said i hated the muslims WHO DIDNT like other cultures in this country and i would kick them out. I know this aint the same thing but..i remember when it was the world cup, and it mi city where theres plenty of muslims etc, the english and british flags wasnt allowed to be waves in public, because they didnt like it!!!!crimson_grunt wrote:
You'd kick your self out the country? Be hard to manage the country that way.
3 cheers then for the fact that you'll never be prime minister
I've got a England Shirt bought it specially for the WC and i wear it every single time when England are playing. Godamn, you'll find me at Headingley watching England in test match cricket! (Heaven)
England flags are banned by the authorties/police because invariably as England fuck up against the Germans or Estonia the far right knobheads motivated by the sight of the George Cross go on a rampage hollering god save the Queen. Same concept used by the Aussies at a rock concert:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-p … 285665.stm
Now this may not happen all the time, but no chances are taken and all eventualities are mitigated against.
Ever heard of the concept of 2 sides to every story? Now off with you back to the stats page and take those exclamation marks with you.
Where are you getting this ridiculous idea that the English flag has been banned? Are you deluded?
I agree with what you're saying there.
'Vilham wrote:
Where are you getting this ridiculous idea that the English flag has been banned? Are you deluded?
The poster above said that English flags were banned at certain soccer events. Admittedly I haven't heard of the English flag specifically being banned, but I know during the World Cup certain items were banned because racists used them. I heard that the Confederate flag was banned because Spanish fans, of all people, were waving it around.
It is banned in some multinational games due to the fact that the football thugs that carry it into their brawls tarnish its image.
Was that a joke or were you being serious because it's looks like sarcasm.URE_DED wrote:
Fact is people Muslims ARE here to overrun our Democratic countries. They hate our beliefs and they are more than happy to use our freedoms to take advantage. This is just like the liberals did in the 50s and 60s - they hated the conservative, Judeo-Christian morals and freedoms they grew up with - they became professors, teachers, politcians and activists - they used their freedom to gain control of the system and they put the values in place that THEY wanted - values that made us rotten to the core, as a country.m3thod wrote:
That still accounts for 1.5% irrespective how well you dress it. I fail to see the fact you are being overun.[TUF]Catbox wrote:
The local authorities with the highest percentage of Muslim population are:
London Borough of Tower Hamlets 36.4% 71,389
London Borough of Newham 24.3% 59,293
Blackburn with Darwen 19.4% 26,674
Bradford 16.1% 75,188
London Borough of Waltham Forest 15.1% 32,902
Luton 14.6% 26,963
Birmingham 14.3% 139,771
London Borough of Hackney 13.8% 27,908
Pendle 13.4% 11,988
Slough 13.4% 15,897
London Borough of Brent 12.3% 32,290
Glasgow 20,000 +
The town of Dewsbury is also known as an area with a large number of Muslims, making up around 30% of the population. Three of the town's schools are specifically Islamic. However, it is part of the district of Kirklees, which is only 10.12% Muslim.
The muslims have a lot of nerve coming to a country and being offended by Christmas lights and other traditions... fuck them... assimilate or go back to your own shithole country you ran away from
This new wave of people don't want to destroy just our morals and values, however. Just don't be surprised when it happens. Because its the liberals in power now that love to wish beyond all hope that all peoples and cultures are inherently peaceful and good. Unchecked immigration! Free welfare for all! Questioning anyone's beliefs is a hate crime (unless you question Christianity - cause that's ok...)!
Our government leader's naivitee will lead to our destruction.
Here's some friendly American advice to our British members. You might want to encourage your government to restrict immigration from places like Pakistan. Sure, most Pakistanis aren't radicals, but all it takes is a small group of nutcases to ruin it for everybody. America could stand to restrict its immigration from these types of countries as well.
But if we do that, it is the start of "Racial Profiling" and all hell from "their side" will break lose. Thats just throwing more pervabial fuel on to the fire
True... that is a possible result, but I figure it's better than the alternative of having a large Muslim population with a significant number of extremists.syndicat111 wrote:
But if we do that, it is the start of "Racial Profiling" and all hell from "their side" will break lose. Thats just throwing more pervabial fuel on to the fire
I would like to ask a question. Where in the world does multi-culturism or multi-religion work?
I take it you are not aware of the british airways air hostess insodent? BA allow pretty much all religious symbols, turbans (cant spell it) etc for there workers to wear. Yet this lady wearing a cross was told to take it off. Clearly u are the one who doesnt know 'shit', for this is BULLSHIT.Vilham wrote:
Clearly you know shit all and are talking crap seeing as MILLIONS of Brits where cross's and other religious devices.syndicat111 wrote:
Look at what is being said - 3 Islamic schools in 1 town? That is not the only point i was trying to make... look beyond it. Women can wear full head dresses in English schools and as a police uniform, yet a British lady cannot wear a cross around her neck? Where is the justice in that?
Seriously though, I have no issues with anyone coming here to improve there life, but that insodent clearly illustrates there are major problems related directly to imigration. If I went to work in BA and wore a turban, and a cross (or any collection of symbols u care to mention) what is my boss going to say, just take off the cross!!!?????? Actually that be an interesting experiment....
Martyn
I agree with what UON said earlier.Bell wrote:
I take it you are not aware of the british airways air hostess insodent? BA allow pretty much all religious symbols, turbans (cant spell it) etc for there workers to wear. Yet this lady wearing a cross was told to take it off. Clearly u are the one who doesnt know 'shit', for this is BULLSHIT.
And BA backed down on that decision.UON wrote:
I'm sure bans are instigated by paranoid PR departments for big business who don't want to risk offending a single person and thus potentially losing custom. I doubt that they actually discuss the issue with the people they think they are offending, and probably actually offend more people by not doing so. And I suspect a general public ban would actually be illegal.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6280311.stm
Last edited by crimson_grunt (2007-01-25 09:11:45)
Why not ban all religious symbols. That way there can be no argument, but then what about freedom of speech. hhhmmmm tough one.
Bell. If you can't spell use the little button at the bottom the page called "Check Spelling". It helps.
Bell. If you can't spell use the little button at the bottom the page called "Check Spelling". It helps.
I'd be up for that.commissargizz wrote:
Why not ban all religious symbols. That way there can be no argument, but then what about freedom of speech. hhhmmmm tough one.
Although a lot of people might argue that you are persecuting people who are required by their religion to wear various symbols (ie Sikhs and turbans).
It works perfectly fine in Canada.commissargizz wrote:
I would like to ask a question. Where in the world does multi-culturism or multi-religion work?