Poll

Do you support George W. Bush?

I supported Bush from the beginning and continue to31%31% - 31
I never supported Bush51%51% - 51
I supported Bush in the beginning but no longer do15%15% - 15
I didn't support Bush in the beiginning but do now3%3% - 3
Total: 100
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|7027|132 and Bush

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

#1     I supported Bush from the beginning and continue to.

You can't just start a war and then a few years later say, "OK, we're done fighting you, some civilians back in America don't want us fighting anymore. So, ok, truces. And don't hate us, we just did this because the same people told us a few years back to come over here and kick some ass." It doesn't happen that way. You need to finish what you started.
You also can't force others(Iraqi's) to be successful.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Homie22
Member
+34|7038|Orange County, California

-=CB=-krazykarl wrote:

Homie22 wrote:

-=CB=-krazykarl wrote:

this from a "homie" need i say more?
and what about 'krazy kar' sound like some crazy farmer redneck. Online names mean nothing the way u really are in real life.. so shut the fuck up u moron bush supporter
it's krazy karl, and it does have to do with my real life little boy. and no, i am not a farmer, or a redneck, there aren't too many of those here in Carlsbad, California. but we do have our fair share of "homies", they cross the street, and walk on the other side when i am walking on my sidewalks. i suggest you do the same, son. figuratively, of course,  here "on line" i am talking about. (i might have to explain it to you "homie")(any questions, just let me know OK?)
lmao nice i think i live near u. i Live  in oc

but what i ment is my name doesn't have to do anything with me in real life like your name.. So don't say shit like " and this is coming from homie etc. ty

Last edited by Homie22 (2007-01-09 20:38:15)

-=CB=-krazykarl
not always PWD, but usually.
+95|6962|Carlsbad, CA, USA

Homie22 wrote:

but what i ment is my name doesn't have to do anything with me in real life like your name.. So don't say shit like " and this is coming from homie etc. ty
no. i will say what i feel like, and to whom i feel like. and if your "name" is "homie", then you have to expect negative connotations, just like i do because i have crazy in my name. welcome to the start of "real life" son, it's not rainbows and lollipops OK? ty.
Not
Great success!
+216|7003|Chandler, AZ

ATG wrote:

#3

I've always been pretty conservative, except for the marijuana smoking. I was one of those absolutely appalled by the Clinton Administration. The thought of at least four years listening to Gore had me with a razor in my hand.

I was promised a different thing than I got. I was sold a strong national defense and fiscally conservative man; we have exactly the opposite,
I could go on, but I have to bath my kids.
No need for me to say anything else regarding how I voted in this poll. Summed up perfectly.
Robbie77
hammer time!
+26|6757|Toronto Canada

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

#1     I supported Bush from the beginning and continue to.

You can't just start a war and then a few years later say, "OK, we're done fighting you, some civilians back in America don't want us fighting anymore. So, ok, truces. And don't hate us, we just did this because the same people told us a few years back to come over here and kick some ass." It doesn't happen that way. You need to finish what you started.
yes but that raises the question, should he have started the war in the first place?
{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7186|San Antonio, Texas

Robbie77 wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

#1     I supported Bush from the beginning and continue to.

You can't just start a war and then a few years later say, "OK, we're done fighting you, some civilians back in America don't want us fighting anymore. So, ok, truces. And don't hate us, we just did this because the same people told us a few years back to come over here and kick some ass." It doesn't happen that way. You need to finish what you started.
yes but that raises the question, should he have started the war in the first place?
Um, let's see, ...they flew civilian airliners into the two world trade centers, one into the pentagon, and another was (supposedly) trying to fly into the white house. Killing thousands. Yes, I do believe we should have started the war.

WWI was started because of a single assassination...

Last edited by {M5}Sniper3 (2007-01-09 21:00:32)

Cougar
Banned
+1,962|7191|Dallas
I supported Bush heavily in the beginning, but after finally realizing what he had done to the economy, foreign relations, constitutional amendments, social services, and what he is and continues to do with his "tax cuts", I no longer support the sheep fucking piece of shit.
RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|6963|Chicago
#2 for me.

ATG wrote:

I was one of those absolutely appalled by the Clinton Administration.
Nothing worse than blowjobs. Not even creating a huge national deficit, and turning unprecedented international support of the US into unadulterated hate for our country. At least there's no semen on Bush's secretary's dress.
Robbie77
hammer time!
+26|6757|Toronto Canada

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Robbie77 wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

#1     I supported Bush from the beginning and continue to.

You can't just start a war and then a few years later say, "OK, we're done fighting you, some civilians back in America don't want us fighting anymore. So, ok, truces. And don't hate us, we just did this because the same people told us a few years back to come over here and kick some ass." It doesn't happen that way. You need to finish what you started.
yes but that raises the question, should he have started the war in the first place?
Um, let's see, ...they flew civilian airliners into the two world trade centers, one into the pentagon, and another was (supposedly) trying to fly into the white house. Killing thousands. Yes, I do believe we should have started the war.

WWI was started because of a single assassination...
yes but did you also know that the u.s declared war on al-quada, and taliban members in Afghanistan in 2002 a year before they did in Iraq ever wonder why the year gap, and do you remember George Bush's' primary reason for invading Iraq "weapons of mass destruction" the war in Afghanistan is much more a war on terrorism then the war on Iraq, then again i bet you didn't even know that Americans were in Afghanistan in the first place, no I'm not just picking on you i didn't mean it like that I'm just saying the majority of Americans don't know that fact
13rin
Member
+977|6905
I voted for him in the beginning and voted to keep him there another 4 years.  He proved that Tax cuts work.  He didn't follow media polls/popular consensus before making any major decisions (the whole reason the electoral college is in place).  He never intended to take an aggressive posture in foreign relations toward enemy states -until we were attacked.  After 9-11 I voted to see him though.  IMO we have not spent enough to insure that our guys had enough body armor, souped up Humvee, screw MOABS - I want 10,000 LBS bombs on those poised to hurt us, etc... Sure he had his share of dumb ass statements (look up at TY's quotes) -But he never stated wishy washy crap like "I voted for the..  ... Before I voted against it."  Bush is a leader.  If you live in America and don't want to see is blipped off the map or incorporated into the EU then he's your guy (or is better than whatever the dems could/have come up with)
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
{M5}Sniper3
Typical white person.
+389|7186|San Antonio, Texas

Robbie77 wrote:

{M5}Sniper3 wrote:

Robbie77 wrote:

yes but that raises the question, should he have started the war in the first place?
Um, let's see, ...they flew civilian airliners into the two world trade centers, one into the pentagon, and another was (supposedly) trying to fly into the white house. Killing thousands. Yes, I do believe we should have started the war.

WWI was started because of a single assassination...
yes but did you also know that the u.s declared war on al-quada, and taliban members in Afghanistan in 2002 a year before they did in Iraq ever wonder why the year gap, and do you remember George Bush's' primary reason for invading Iraq "weapons of mass destruction" the war in Afghanistan is much more a war on terrorism then the war on Iraq, then again i bet you didn't even know that Americans were in Afghanistan in the first place, no I'm not just picking on you i didn't mean it like that I'm just saying the majority of Americans don't know that fact
I know that we went into Afghanistan first. (And, yes, it IS sad that some Americans can't remember a few years back to the invasion of Afghanistan.) The year gap is probably spent moving troops, destroying known terrorist cells and preforming a search-and-destroy on remaining terrorist cells. I do remember Bush's primary reason for invading Iraq. And truthfully, I didn't believe it. But I bet that we wouldn't be in Iraq right now if more people didn't believe it. But I am glad that we did go into Iraq and destroy a couple more cells and that we killed a socialist dictator named Saddam Hussein.



On a side note: Yes, this IS a thread in DAST where two people are expressing different points of views / arguing WITHOUT resorting to name-calling / slander!
djphetal
Go Ducks.
+346|6762|Oregon
no I do not, i never did, i never will, and in a few decades, when the secrets of his administration come out, he'll be known as one of the worst world leaders ever.
Mogura
Member
+17|6789|EUROPE
well if he say its ok to invade iraq then he is right, after all he is from Texas, he must be right
JimmyBotswana
Member
+82|7012|Montreal
When Bush was appointed President by the Supreme Court a friend of mine said "Bush is going to destroy the world." I didn't like Bush very much but I didn't think he would destroy the world. I never counted on his administration being able to engineer 9/11 by planting explosives in the twin towers and using it to sell Americans on empire. Now, with everything he's done to the Constitution and innocent Americans, I'm not so sure my friend was wrong anymore.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6981
"You know, one of the hardest parts of my job is to connect Iraq to the war on terror." --George W. Bush, interview with CBS News' Katie Couric, Sept. 6, 2006

Maria Bartiromo: "I'm curious, have you ever googled anybody? Do you use Google?"
President Bush: "Occasionally. One of the things I've used on the Google is to pull up maps. It's very interesting to see -- I've forgot the name of the program -- but you get the satellite, and you can -- like, I kinda like to look at the ranch. It remind me of where I wanna be sometimes." --interview with CNBC's Maria Bartiromo, Oct. 24, 2006

"I think -- tide turning -- see, as I remember -- I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of -- it's easy to see a tide turn -- did I say those words?" --George W. Bush, asked if the tide was turning in Iraq, Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"I'm the decider, and I decide what is best. And what's best is for Don Rumsfeld to remain as the Secretary of Defense." --George W. Bush, Washington, D.C. April 18, 2006

"I think we are welcomed. But it was not a peaceful welcome." --George W. Bush, defending Vice President Dick Cheney's pre-war assertion that the United States would be welcomed in Iraq as liberators, NBC Nightly News interview, Dec. 12, 2005

"Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job." --George W. Bush, to FEMA director Michael Brown, who resigned 10 days later amid criticism over his job performance, Mobile, Ala., Sept. 2, 2005

"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda." --George W. Bush, Greece, N.Y., May 24, 2005

"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table." --George W. Bush, Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005

MORON...
TeamZephyr
Maintaining My Rage Since 1975
+124|6955|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia
Never supported him, never will.
Lost Hope
Lurker
+20|6753|Brussels, Belgium
Same here, he wasn't ready for that, he should instead work for anti drugs ads where he will say : "Don't do drugs or you'll end up like me kids."
https://bf3s.com/sigs/9c9f8f6ff3579a4c711aa54bbb9e928ec0786003.png
crimson_grunt
Shitty Disposition (apparently)
+214|7080|Teesside, UK

Homie22 wrote:

vote proves we have more dumbasses then smart people.... how sad.
No it proves people have different opinions to you. They are allowed to make their own decision.
deeznutz1245
Connecticut: our chimps are stealin yo' faces.
+483|6919|Connecticut

-=CB=-krazykarl wrote:

I prefer an unimaginative, weasel to a wishy-washy, sack of shit.
I really, really don't think anyone can say it better than that.
Malloy must go
JahManRed
wank
+646|7054|IRELAND

ATG wrote:

#3

I've always been pretty conservative, except for the marijuana smoking. I was one of those absolutely appalled by the Clinton Administration. The thought of at least four years listening to Gore had me with a razor in my hand.

I was promised a different thing than I got. I was sold a strong national defense and fiscally conservative man; we have exactly the opposite,
I could go on, but I have to bath my kids.
Unfortunately the same thing happens in global politics in general. Its not unique to the States.

Take the conservative party in Britain. They screwed the country up royally for 15 years. The Labor party was swept in on the winds of change, socialism and 'New' Labor, promising us a massive change in policies and direction. When they won the election they then carried on the conservatives policies of privatization (not very socialist) with 'New' vigor. They didn't carry through half of their polices they got votted in under.  They were swept in on the promise of being a party for the people and made the conservatives out to be out to help the rich big businesses while forgetting about the ordinary man on the street. Well Labor didn't listen to the ordinary man on the street when they got involved in the Iraqi war.
Now with the elections coming up, the Conservatives have reinvented themselves, got rid of the old guard as Labor did before they took power, went all green and are promising the electorate the world. I am prity sure that as 80% of the population is pissed at Blair over Iraqi and the government is being out voted by its own Back bencher's on key policies in Parliament that the conservatives will be carried into power at the upcoming elections. Hence the cycle begins again.

Same shit in America. Clinton fucked up so you voted in Bush, Bush fucks up so vote in someone else.

The sooner we all realise that politicians are out for themselves and big business first and the common man last, the better for all of us. And actually believing that your government gives a fuck about your opinion is leading us all down the garden path.

If governments value our opinion then why have the UK and US governments relatively recently created huge spin departments who's soul job is to not do what the people want, but to convince them to do what the politicians want. Its sick, we the people have no power we are kept in a straight jacket of partly our own making by these spin departments.
Rant over.
GATOR591957
Member
+84|7053
I support him when he makes a stand that is correct in his policies.  That said I haven't supported him much.

It is every Americans responsibility to question those in authority.  What President said that?
jonsimon
Member
+224|6921
Bush fails.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard