That's an interesting analogy.The Stillhouse Kid wrote:
Take a hungry 4 year-old and sit them at the dining table. Place in front of them a plate of vegetables that they don't like on the left and a bowl of their favorite ice cream on the right. Anyone can tell you that the kid will take the ice cream, but does our foreknowledge of the choice mean they have no free will?
I think the important point of contention is that God is usually regarded as both omnipotent and omniscient.
Therefore, he/she/it created humans with the knowledge of which of us would make the right and wrong decisions. So, from this perspective, he literally created some of us with the purpose of making the wrong choices. Essentially, our natures are defined by his actions. We are created with tendencies toward certain actions.
So, technically, free will still exists, but the odds are heavily stacked against certain people -- mostly by no choice of their own.
A God like this cannot be regarded as benevolent or compassionate in the least bit. This is why I do not believe in a God. Instead, it is only free will and circumstance that define us. There is no deity with which to blame our failures on or credit our successes with.
This is our world, so let's stop speculating on the unknowable and instead work on improving the tangible aspects of existence.