http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6205299.stm...The Archbishop of Canterbury has accused the UK government of placing Christians in the Middle East at risk through its actions in Iraq.
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Let us remember ordinary Christians in Iraq this Christmas
Fuck him and fuck the church.
Wow... this is one of the few times where I find myself in agreement with the clergy.IG-Calibre wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6205299.stm...The Archbishop of Canterbury has accused the UK government of placing Christians in the Middle East at risk through its actions in Iraq.
On the one hand, you can't really blame the British government for the actions of terrorists, but on the other hand, the Coalition of the Willing did create an environment of chaos by removing a stable (albeit oppressive) government.
Stable. Tell that to the people who were slaughtered under Saddam's stable regime.Turquoise wrote:
the Coalition of the Willing did create an environment of chaos by removing a stable (albeit oppressive) government.
Turquoise wrote:
you can't really blame the British government for the actions of terrorists
I never said stability was a compassionate thing. Still, the difference between worrying if a dictator will kill you and whether or not a group of terrorists will kill you is a matter of logic. Saddam usually only killed people that he saw as a threat to his power. Terrorists kill people for the fuck of it. You can avoid the wrath of a dictator by mostly keeping a low profile -- you can't avoid a bomb wielding maniac very easily.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Stable. Tell that to the people who were slaughtered under Saddam's stable regime.Turquoise wrote:
the Coalition of the Willing did create an environment of chaos by removing a stable (albeit oppressive) government.Turquoise wrote:
you can't really blame the British government for the actions of terrorists
I don't know how many times I've said this in DST, but dead is dead. A corpse doesn't care whether or not its murderer was government or criminal.Turquoise wrote:
I never said stability was a compassionate thing. Still, the difference between worrying if a dictator will kill you and whether or not a group of terrorists will kill you is a matter of logic. Saddam usually only killed people that he saw as a threat to his power. Terrorists kill people for the fuck of it. You can avoid the wrath of a dictator by mostly keeping a low profile -- you can't avoid a bomb wielding maniac very easily.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Stable. Tell that to the people who were slaughtered under Saddam's stable regime.Turquoise wrote:
the Coalition of the Willing did create an environment of chaos by removing a stable (albeit oppressive) government.Turquoise wrote:
you can't really blame the British government for the actions of terrorists
Heh. Low profile, indeed. Still didn't stop people from dying under his thumb.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2006-12-23 19:39:41)
I can't debate that. It's just that I don't see Iraq as being better now than it was under Saddam. How do you?....unnamednewbie13 wrote:
I don't know how many times I've said this in DST, but dead is dead. A corpse doesn't care whether or not its murderer was government or criminal.Turquoise wrote:
I never said stability was a compassionate thing. Still, the difference between worrying if a dictator will kill you and whether or not a group of terrorists will kill you is a matter of logic. Saddam usually only killed people that he saw as a threat to his power. Terrorists kill people for the fuck of it. You can avoid the wrath of a dictator by mostly keeping a low profile -- you can't avoid a bomb wielding maniac very easily.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Stable. Tell that to the people who were slaughtered under Saddam's stable regime.Turquoise wrote:
the Coalition of the Willing did create an environment of chaos by removing a stable (albeit oppressive) government.
It was chaotic before, it's chaotic now and it will continue to be chaotic for some time to come. You'll never find me praising the situation in Iraq.Turquoise wrote:
I can't debate that. It's just that I don't see Iraq as being better now than it was under Saddam. How do you?....
Then, perhaps, you'd agree that invasion was rather futile....unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It was chaotic before, it's chaotic now and it will continue to be chaotic for some time to come. You'll never find me praising the situation in Iraq.Turquoise wrote:
I can't debate that. It's just that I don't see Iraq as being better now than it was under Saddam. How do you?....
ordinary christians have never been safe in the middle east, so it really doesn't make much difference...
^^^^ Wow. You really believe that?
Last edited by chittydog (2006-12-23 20:34:05)
Let's remember all the people in Iraq, all of the time and not on some stupid Christian festival.
Invasion is not futile. Fruitless occupation is.Turquoise wrote:
Then, perhaps, you'd agree that invasion was rather futile....unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It was chaotic before, it's chaotic now and it will continue to be chaotic for some time to come. You'll never find me praising the situation in Iraq.Turquoise wrote:
I can't debate that. It's just that I don't see Iraq as being better now than it was under Saddam. How do you?....
Yeah just some stupid festival, its only when jesus was born after all.commissargizz wrote:
Let's remember all the people in Iraq, all of the time and not on some stupid Christian festival.
Scientists think he was born around Easter or something, but then I dont really give a shit so what ever.LostFate wrote:
Yeah just some stupid festival, its only when jesus was born after all.commissargizz wrote:
Let's remember all the people in Iraq, all of the time and not on some stupid Christian festival.
No, he was reborn in easterCommie Killer wrote:
Scientists think he was born around Easter or something, but then I dont really give a shit so what ever.LostFate wrote:
Yeah just some stupid festival, its only when jesus was born after all.commissargizz wrote:
Let's remember all the people in Iraq, all of the time and not on some stupid Christian festival.
Hmmm?... If you're suggesting that we fund the costs of the occupation with revenue from the oil produced in Iraq, then I agree. Unfortunately, it's a bit too chaotic for us to establish a viable system for that at the moment.unnamednewbie13 wrote:
Invasion is not futile. Fruitless occupation is.Turquoise wrote:
Then, perhaps, you'd agree that invasion was rather futile....unnamednewbie13 wrote:
It was chaotic before, it's chaotic now and it will continue to be chaotic for some time to come. You'll never find me praising the situation in Iraq.
Last edited by Turquoise (2006-12-29 00:41:01)
Pages: 1
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- Let us remember ordinary Christians in Iraq this Christmas