What do you think about the BBC? Is it the most impartial News source in the World? If you think it isn't please say which one is.
Last edited by sergeriver (2006-12-27 09:29:02)
Pages: 1 2
Yes | 53% | 53% - 34 | ||||
No | 46% | 46% - 30 | ||||
Total: 64 |
Last edited by sergeriver (2006-12-27 09:29:02)
Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-27 09:31:17)
Last edited by King_County_Downy (2006-12-27 09:36:38)
QFTCameronPoe wrote:
To be honest there isn't much competition for the BBC in the whole 'trying to be unbiased' front in the international news media. Reuters maybe?
The BBC is the least biased IMO (that's not to say that they don't have a bias). I'd like to hear peoples opinions on what they view as 'unbiased' news sources.
The poll is about the most unbiased, but I don't think Al Jazeera is the most biased.King_County_Downy wrote:
The most biased? No. Al Jahzeer gets that title.
Last edited by sergeriver (2006-12-27 09:37:01)
Do you have the english version of the channel? It's actually not as bad as you might fear.King_County_Downy wrote:
The most biased? No. Al Jahzeer gets that title.
No, yeah, I do watch it whenever I get the chance but it's only on like once a week here and I usually miss it. I do enjoy seeing other people's perspective of the world.CameronPoe wrote:
Do you have the english version of the channel? It's actually not as bad as you might fear.King_County_Downy wrote:
The most biased? No. Al Jahzeer gets that title.
Yeah, I saw that and edited my post above. I'm assuming Fox is coming to your mind as the most biased...I think they're pretty equal when it comes to that. If you're not thinking Fox, who then just so I can be clear?sergeriver wrote:
The poll is about the most unbiased, but I don't think Al Jazeera is the most biased.King_County_Downy wrote:
The most biased? No. Al Jahzeer gets that title.
Last edited by King_County_Downy (2006-12-27 09:47:42)
If you don't have the channel there, read the Al Jazeera News site. It isn't as anti-America as you might think. Most of the media is biased, so it's difficult for me to say this one is the most biased, but I'm sure BBC is the most unbiased. Fox certainly isn't unbiased, but I couldn't say it's the most biased one.King_County_Downy wrote:
Yeah, I saw that and edited my post above. I'm assuming Fox is coming to your mind as the most biased...I think they're pretty equal when it comes to that. If you're not thinking Fox, who then just so I can be clear?sergeriver wrote:
The poll is about the most unbiased, but I don't think Al Jazeera is the most biased.King_County_Downy wrote:
The most biased? No. Al Jahzeer gets that title.
Last edited by sergeriver (2006-12-27 09:50:31)
Owned.Kmarion wrote:
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
I like the way you say Rueters and AP rank high in your esteem and yet fail to link to either of them for your damning of the BBC. Instead plumping for unheard of websites that are either syndicating the same uncited story or employees the writers of Jewish magazines to criticise them on their refusal to kiss israel's arse. Again, you're using obviously heavily biased sources to point the finger at the reletively unbiased BBC. You might as well ask Fidel Castro what he thinks of the Financial Times...Kmarion wrote:
Not to say that these two are completely unbiased but I would have to say Reuters or AP.
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
How about a link to their own acknowldgement of their bias. http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt .=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
I like the way you say Rueters and AP rank high in your esteem and yet fail to link to either of them for your damning of the BBC. Instead plumping for unheard of websites that are either syndicating the same uncited story or employees the writers of Jewish magazines to criticise them on their refusal to kiss israel's arse. Again, you're using obviously heavily biased sources to point the finger at the reletively unbiased BBC. You might as well ask Fidel Castro what he thinks of the Financial Times...Kmarion wrote:
Not to say that these two are completely unbiased but I would have to say Reuters or AP.
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
I'm guessing the AP and Rueters links won't come, ahh nevermind I guess we'll have to put up with www.imsopatrioticihavetheflagtatooedonmypenis.com next....
Last edited by Kmarion (2006-12-27 14:23:16)
You are hilarious. Now you are calling BBC extreme liberal and anti-US bias? I don't think BBC is unbiased, I'm sure of it. Am I anti-American if I call the BBC unbiased?Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Owned.Kmarion wrote:
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
The reason why many of you think BBC is unbiased is because they are aligned to your extreme liberal and anti-US bias.
This is the proof that the BBC is the most unbiased News source ever. You posted the link to it and it says:Kmarion wrote:
How about a link to their own acknowldgement of their bias. http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt .=OBS= EstebanRey wrote:
I like the way you say Rueters and AP rank high in your esteem and yet fail to link to either of them for your damning of the BBC. Instead plumping for unheard of websites that are either syndicating the same uncited story or employees the writers of Jewish magazines to criticise them on their refusal to kiss israel's arse. Again, you're using obviously heavily biased sources to point the finger at the reletively unbiased BBC. You might as well ask Fidel Castro what he thinks of the Financial Times...Kmarion wrote:
Not to say that these two are completely unbiased but I would have to say Reuters or AP.
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
I'm guessing the AP and Rueters links won't come, ahh nevermind I guess we'll have to put up with www.imsopatrioticihavetheflagtatooedonmypenis.com next....
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4964702.stm
While you are at it, go ahead and keep the penis links to yourself.
how is the BBC anti-US?Fancy_Pollux wrote:
Owned.Kmarion wrote:
As far as the BBC.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/st … 83,00.html
http://www.honestreporting.co.uk/articl … se_BBC.asp
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
http://www.globalbritain.org/BBC/Times28Jan05.jpg
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/arti … article.do
Here you can see the report where the bias is acknowledged by the BBC.
http://www.bbcgovernors.co.uk/docs/revi … _final.txt
The reason why many of you think BBC is unbiased is because they are aligned to your extreme liberal and anti-US bias.
Pages: 1 2