IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7047|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
LMFBO you couldn't write it in a book
"...Loyalist Michael Stone's planned incursion on a crucial meeting of Stormont politicians was "performance art", his defence lawyer has claimed."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/6193169.stm
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6710|North Carolina
Essentially, his lawyer is saying he's a joke.  It's a bullshit claim, but it is funny.
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,060|7076|PNW

How on Earth would he get away with that defense? Someone in the US could shoot a 7-11 clerk in the face with a water gun spray-painted black to look realistic...and then call it performance art. Think that'd save them from jail?
JahManRed
wank
+646|6933|IRELAND

unnamednewbie13 wrote:

How on Earth would he get away with that defense? Someone in the US could shoot a 7-11 clerk in the face with a water gun spray-painted black to look realistic...and then call it performance art. Think that'd save them from jail?
Yes it would, because he would be laying with his face spread across the wall after the clerk pulled a Sawn off on him.

Stone is an idiot. He told the police when arrested that he was for killing the Shinner leadership. He was going to sacrifice his life for Ulster. He would have been our first suicide bomber. I can imagine his lawyer made this shit up for him, or at least put it in his head. Because he is obviously an idiot.
DoctorFruitloop
Level 13 Wrongdoer
+515|6851|Doncaster, UK
If the explosives weren't viable one could almost think he was trying to get the forces to shoot him and then be viewed as a martyr maybe.
TeamZephyr
Maintaining My Rage Since 1975
+124|6834|Hillside, Melbourne, Australia
Dem Loyalists are crazies.

If you want to live in England so much go and live in England.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6860
Hilarious. To be honest, defending that cunt can't be the easiest task on earth.
JahManRed
wank
+646|6933|IRELAND

DoctorFruitloop wrote:

If the explosives weren't viable one could almost think he was trying to get the forces to shoot him and then be viewed as a martyr maybe.
He is already a Martyr to loyalists for this:
DoctorFruitloop
Level 13 Wrongdoer
+515|6851|Doncaster, UK
I know but if they had actually shot him there'd be all the uproar surrounding someone being unlaefully killed, and people saying that it was obvious the explosives weren't real, and it would give even more publicity to the cause.

I don't pretend to know anything about the whole loyalist agenda, but from a purely ignorant point of view this is how it appears to me. The fact that it didn't go off as planned appears to necessitate this rather ridiculous claim of it being "art"!

Last edited by DoctorFruitloop (2006-12-21 03:05:06)

IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7047|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha one less psycho in our society bye bye Stone, hope ye never see the light of day again in civil society!

Loyalist killer Michael Stone has been found guilty of trying to murder Sinn Fein's Martin McGuinness and Gerry Adams at Stormont in November 2006.

He was also convicted of seven other charges, including possession of weapons and explosive devices.

Stone had denied the charges, claiming the incident was performance art. However, a judge at Belfast Crown Court said this was "wholly unconvincing".

The convicted murderer will be sentenced at a later date.

Stone had attempted to enter Stormont on the day Ian Paisley and Martin McGuinness were due to be nominated as Northern Ireland's new first and deputy first ministers.

The trial heard he pointed an imitation gun at a female security guard, ignited an improvised explosive device in a flight bag and threw it some yards from him.

The bag contained explosive fireworks, flammable liquids, a butane gas canister and fuses. It failed to explode.

He was found to have seven nail bombs which the court heard were capable of causing death or serious injury to anyone in their proximity.

Stone also had three knives, a hatchet and a garrotte.

'Wholly unreliable'

Mr Justice Deeny said Stone had been "a wholly unreliable and unconvincing witness whose testimony… is wholly undeserving of belief".

He concluded Stone had not merely prepared the explosive devices and gone to Stormont estate, but had "stepped over a line by entering the building and igniting the bag which was a necessary part of his plan to kill the Sinn Fein leaders".

He had therefore gone beyond acts that were merely preparatory.

The judge also noted Stone had repeatedly told police when arrested that his intention was to kill Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness, including that he would have slit their throats if he had got close enough.

The defendant had also written letters to two journalists, which he posted on his way to Stormont, saying this was his intention.

In 2000, Stone was released early from a life sentence under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement.

He had been jailed for a 1988 gun and grenade attack on the republican funeral at Milltown Cemetery of three IRA members shot dead by the SAS in Gibraltar.

Three men were killed in that attack and Stone also admitted three other murders.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7729744.stm
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6595|Éire
He is loop the fucking loop. I think Unionists are getting kind of embarrassed of him at this stage.

"Noooo Surrrrennder"
Braddock
Agitator
+916|6595|Éire
He just had his bail application rejected apparently!
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6527|Escea

So which side was he on? Was he trying to blow up the IRA dude?
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7047|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
See the HET ( the Historical Enquiries Team) have ruled (November 8th) that Stone lied in his autobiography when he denied killing a Catholic delivery man, Stone was convicted of the murder of Dermott Hackett (37) when he was shot up to 16 times as he drove his van in Co Tyrone in May 1987.

Despite confessing to the murder at the time, Stone later claimed in his book None Shall Divide Us that he did not kill Mr Hackett.
The HET reviewed the original police investigations following the claims in Stone’s book and have now found there was “no evidential foundation” in the false confession claims.It added that there was “significant circumstantial evidence that would support Stone’s own admissions as to the involvement in the murder.”

Last night Mr Hackett’s widow, Sylvia, welcomed the findings.

“I am relieved that the HET report into Dermott’s murder has found no evidence to undermine Michael Stone’s convictions,” she said.

“I also welcome the HET’s confirmation that Dermott had no involvement with any paramilitary group.

“This report has confirmed Dermott’s innocence and has provided a degree of closure for the family.”

The family’s solicitor, Brendan Murphy, said the HET had to overcome the “failure of the original RUC investigation to retain portions of the forensic records”.

“Nonetheless the HET have concluded that Michael Stone’s assertions in his book, that he made a false confession admitting to the murder of Mr Hackett, have no evidential foundation,” he said.

http://www.irishnews.com/appnews/540/58 … iller.html

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard