CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

It's easy to speculate. Providing 'proof that there is speculation' is spectacularly redundant. I can provide proof that there is speculation that aliens exist. Read my edited post above.
That's great, but irrelevant. My claims were correct. Being redundant != being incorrect.
I realise that - making a redundant post is just making a redundant post. It's not right or wrong, good or bad, it's just redundant (pointless).

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Most of the country? LOL. Less than 40% represents a minority, in case you haven't heard.

Get over yourself - you're obviously from the do-nothing landed classes of Venezuelan society, getting rich off the misery of others. I've been to Latin America several times and it's patently obvious how the system works over there - perpetuation of the gap between rich and poor.
Also, visiting a country != being an expert on it. It is pretty pathetic when your best attempt at a counterpoint provides only an assertion at best, and one that is a borderline personal attack. There are people who live in the region or have family that do, but they're wrong regardless simply because you've been to Latin America? I'm sorry, but they have far more credibility than you do if you insist on using your visits to the country as reason for credibility. You seem to have adopted this over-inflated sense of self-worth and importance and it is quite apparent in many of your posts as of late.
Did I claim that visiting a country made anyone an expert on said country? All it does is give you a clearer idea in reality of the actualities on the ground in a particular country, unfiltered by the media or the internet. I can understand the position of the people he speaks of. There are two sides to every story and there are millions of people in Venezuela, all with their own individual viewpoints. It is no fault of his own that his realtions are part of the less than 10% of the Venezuelan population basking in untold wealth while the rest of the country languishes in poverty. His family is prisoner to the likely opportunism and exploitation his ancestors exercised. As such they are largely blameless and unfortunately are the scapegoat for Chavez. I sympathise with them but the fact remains that the actions required to right Venezuela will probably impinge on them adversely (given that the poverty gap must be closed and that means closing the gap in power/influence).

I'm not interested in 'self-worth'. I state opinions. I try and support them with facts/experience. You like them or you don't. Take them or leave them. It's as simple as that.

PS You haven't actually counterpointed anything as yet. You just provided proof that there is speculation of something. What is your solution to the problems in Venezuela Pollux? I'd like to hear them. I have no concrete solution but I know that something is deeply wrong with Venezuela's past.

PPS If the Chavez re-election is SOOOooooo obviously rigged then why after the CIA seemingly managed to successfully carry out a coup did PEOPLE POWER in Venezuela manage to have him be returned from exile and back into power despite the fact the replacement puppets replaced ALL media with their own and had the army on their side. The fact is he is a popular guy, like it or not, with a lot of the populace. He is also a hated guy by many. There are way more poor people than rich people in Venezuela and he appeals to poor people, hence the reason he gets democratically elected on quite the regular basis...

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 02:26:56)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,979|6890|949

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

With that in mind, I think one would have to be living in a clouded dreamworld to actually believe that the election was not rigged. Saying Chavez was democratically elected is like saying Saddam was democratically elected.
Why do you believe the election was rigged?
SpaceApollyon
Scratch where it itches
+41|6778|Finland

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

With that in mind, I think one would have to be living in a clouded dreamworld to actually believe that the election was not rigged. Saying Chavez was democratically elected is like saying Saddam was democratically elected.
Messages from this clouded dreamworld you speak of?

"No reason for doubt"  :BBC
Audit finds no fraud     :Guardian
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

SpaceApollyon wrote:

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

With that in mind, I think one would have to be living in a clouded dreamworld to actually believe that the election was not rigged. Saying Chavez was democratically elected is like saying Saddam was democratically elected.
Messages from this clouded dreamworld you speak of?

"No reason for doubt"  :BBC
Audit finds no fraud     :Guardian
Pollux prefers to rely on hotair.com, etc. - check his enlightening links.

I like his quote of mine in his sig. A comment I rolled back on and conceded as being incorrect in a subsequent post.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 01:54:17)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

As for CameronPoe, he is aligned one way and nothing will change that. He will always be anti-US or anything the US stands for, regardless of how ridiculous of a claim he would have to make to support his argument. His comments on the Marshall Plan come to mind. This forum is so predictable it's sad.
To coin a phrase from Stephen Colbert - you're obviously not some 'brainiac on the nerd patrol', your obviously not a member of the 'factanista'. You appear to speak 'from the gut'.

I'm anti-Bush, anti-neo-conservative, anti-PNAC. That's it. The Democrats are in power now in USA. A new dawn has arrived. Hopefully a better one. There is a lot to be admired about the US. I've spent several months of my life there. I didn't hate every minute of it, in fact I enjoyed every minute of it. The US purports to stand for free speech: whaddayaknow??? So do I! If you don't have the cranial capacity to disassociate views on policies and views on an entire nation then more pity on you.

'I'd like to know how the Washington Post will spin that one tomorrow...'

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 02:05:03)

EVieira
Member
+105|6737|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

I didn't speculate that Carter helped rig the election. I only claimed that speculation on the matter existed and showed examples of it. I did not say that the sources were credible nor correct in what they speculated. You are only wasting your breath trying to blow it up into something it's not.
Your sources are very weak, one of them is even called "hotair.com". Its much more likely that the voting in Florida was rigged in Bush's reelection than in Venezuela. Specially considering the US was watching very closely, if there was any suspicion of rigging the US government would have put it in all newspapers to try and put Chavez out of power. What do you think Jimmy Carter was doing there, ffs????

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

With that in mind, I think one would have to be living in a clouded dreamworld to actually believe that the election was not rigged. Saying Chavez was democratically elected is like saying Saddam was democratically elected. Of course you're going to disagree with me no matter what because you have been a self-proclaimed communist on these forums. Your hilarious defense of Cuba and the Soviets in the Cuban missile crisis thread comes to mind. As for CameronPoe, he is aligned one way and nothing will change that. He will always be anti-US or anything the US stands for, regardless of how ridiculous of a claim he would have to make to support his argument. His comments on the Marshall Plan come to mind. This forum is so predictable it's sad.
Sorry, Chavez has won democratically and you will have to accept that democracy can elect someone not pro-US. I don't like him either, as you can read from my previous posts, but I respect the choice of Venezuela.

Actually, his election is even more democratic that the US, considering he got a majority of the peoples vote, something Bush didn't achieve.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
EVieira
Member
+105|6737|Lutenblaag, Molvania

CameronPoe wrote:

I don't support Chavez. I support Latin America taking some other direction. I am wary of what Chavez plans for the country. All I know is that change from the status quo is good.
Totally agree with you there, the status quo around here must change.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
JahManRed
wank
+646|6886|IRELAND

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

With that in mind, I think one would have to be living in a clouded dreamworld to actually believe that the election was not rigged. Saying Chavez was democratically elected is like saying Saddam was democratically elected.
Why do you believe the election was rigged?
Because there was an American Ex President involved and we know how good they are at rigging elections.
Heres some obviously bias sources to 'collaborate' my 'claim' /sarcasm.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/voting.shtml
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/ARTICLE3/
Fancy_Pollux
Connoisseur of Fine Wine
+1,306|6904

CameronPoe wrote:

Pollux prefers to rely on hotair.com, etc. - check his enlightening links.

I like his quote of mine in his sig. A comment I rolled back on and conceded as being incorrect in a subsequent post.
That's great, but I acknowledged that those links weren't credible when I posted them. They only prove that there is speculation that the election was rigged, not that the election was actually rigged. Therefore, it doesn't matter what source I post in that sense. Even "credible" sources show that the speculation exists:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3623128.stm

I've been saying this all along but you still have not been able to make that distinction. I've seen IRONCHEF make better attempts at arguing with me. So what do you do? You take the mature route and put a quote in your sig? Like it or not, that quote is true. The speculation does exist. Your quote on the other hand, only supports my claim that you are so insanely one-sided that you are willing to argue against fact and logic. The U.S. help Ireland with the Marshall Plan!? Rubbish! I'll have none of it! If you're going to be arrogant, at least be right.

They say the National Electoral Council (CNE) - the state-appointed election authority - is biased towards parties close to Mr Chavez and that the results will therefore be rigged.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4492758.stm

Opposition leaders said the review would not properly investigate their allegations of massive fraud.

They are calling for checks to include touch-screen voting machines, saying many were rigged - allegations rejected by electoral officials.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3575146.stm

Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-12-05 03:53:29)

EVieira
Member
+105|6737|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

That's great, but I acknowledged that those links weren't credible when I posted them. They only prove that there is speculation that the election was rigged, not that the election was actually rigged. Therefore, it doesn't matter what source I post in that sense. Even "credible" sources show that the speculation exists:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3623128.stm

I've been saying this all along but you still have not been able to make that distinction. I've seen IRONCHEF make better attempts at arguing with me. So what do you do? You take the mature route and put a quote in your sig? Like it or not, that quote is true. The speculation does exist. Your quote on the other hand, only supports my claim that you are so insanely one-sided that you are willing to argue against fact and logic. The U.S. help Ireland with the Marshall Plan!? Rubbish! I'll have none of it! If you're going to be arrogant, at least be right.
You have failed to discredit Venezuela's election, posted the most ridiculous sources, and now is posting random things about Ireland, Ironchef, the Marshal Plan that are completely off topic and is starting a Cameron Poe bashing argument. Go start a topic of your own with all those views of yours, and don't derail this one.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
Fancy_Pollux
Connoisseur of Fine Wine
+1,306|6904

SpaceApollyon wrote:

A link to 2004 news???
Have you been reading my posts? I'm using the possibility of Chavez's last election being rigged as a basis for this one possibly being rigged as well.

EVieira wrote:

You have failed to discredit Venezuela's election, posted the most ridiculous sources, and now is posting random things about Ireland, Ironchef, the Marshal Plan that are completely off topic and is starting a Cameron Poe bashing argument. Go start a topic of your own with all those views of yours, and don't derail this one.
I have just quoted BBC. I have already explained why the credibility of those previous sources I posted did not matter, as they are only an example of the speculation, not that the speculation is necessarily true. Bringing up the Mashall Plan among other things is just an example of how there is no hope for this debate. CameronPoe, and other posters such as JahManRed, have been so insanely one-sided on every issue even in the face of fact, that their argument really means nothing.

Last edited by Fancy_Pollux (2006-12-05 03:49:24)

CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

Pollux prefers to rely on hotair.com, etc. - check his enlightening links.

I like his quote of mine in his sig. A comment I rolled back on and conceded as being incorrect in a subsequent post.
That's great, but I acknowledged that those links weren't credible when I posted them. They only prove that there is speculation that the election was rigged, not that the election was actually rigged. Therefore, it doesn't matter what source I post in that sense. Even "credible" sources show that the speculation exists:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3623128.stm

I've been saying this all along but you still have not been able to make that distinction. I've seen IRONCHEF make better attempts at arguing with me. So what do you do? You take the mature route and put a quote in your sig? Like it or not, that quote is true. The speculation does exist. Your quote on the other hand, only supports my claim that you are so insanely one-sided that you are willing to argue against fact and logic. The U.S. help Ireland with the Marshall Plan!? Rubbish! I'll have none of it! If you're going to be arrogant, at least be right.

They say the National Electoral Council (CNE) - the state-appointed election authority - is biased towards parties close to Mr Chavez and that the results will therefore be rigged.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4492758.stm
Taken from your first BBC link:

BBC wrote:

An audit of voting machines by international observers found no evidence of fraud in the referendum which Mr Chavez won convincingly.
From your second BBC link:

BBC wrote:

International election monitors have endorsed the result.
If Americans and Eruopeans see fit to endorse the result based on western-standard audits then it's OK with me!

***Shock horror*** - The desperate opposition calls fraud!!! Didn't the Dems do that in 2000? LOL.

I don't disagree with you: I understand that all you stated was that there 'was speculation'. Everyone who reads the sentence will understand this also. You have nothing to worry about there. Of course the speculation exists. I don't dispute that. I never disputed there was speculation. There is speculation about all sorts of things. I speculate from time to time.

You accuse me of not arguing properly but what is your argument? I can't decipher where the difference of opinion lies. I agree with you that there is speculation. I just find the statement of said fact redundant. Especially given that the speculation was, in hindsight, completely unfounded.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 04:21:18)

JahManRed
wank
+646|6886|IRELAND

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

and other posters such as JahManRed, have been so insanely one-sided on every issue even in the face of fact, that their argument really means nothing.
And your not one sided??? Catch a grip of yourself.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

Bringing up the Mashall Plan among other things is just an example of how there is no hope for this debate.
No hope for debate? When I apologised and admitted I was wrong in that thread!!!! What kind of debates do you engage in!!?
SpaceApollyon
Scratch where it itches
+41|6778|Finland

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

SpaceApollyon wrote:

A link to 2004 news???
Have you been reading my posts? I'm using the possibility of Chavez's last election being rigged as a basis for this one possibly being rigged as well.
It seems that I also linked to 2004 news, thats why I deleted my post. On the other hand, those links state that the 2004 election had no fraud, so the last election gives no basis to think that 2006 elections were rigged. The 2000 election is another story though.
I've yet to find any audit material on these 2006 elections.

As to have I read your posts? Yes I have.
Thats how I came upon your statement about people in 'clouded dreamworlds' and I thought it called for a counterargument.
EVieira
Member
+105|6737|Lutenblaag, Molvania

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

I'm sure those elections weren't rigged...

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

It is common knowledge that Chavez rigged his last election, so it would be safe to assume that this one was rigged as well.
You were making some blatant unfounded speculations yourself, probably based on those links you posted earlier. You just did a "Venezuela election rigged" search on google and posted the first things you found, obviously because in your head you had already decided Chavez rigged the elections. That's much more one-sided than Poe, Ironchef or any other.

We have NO REASON to think, or even speculate, that Venezuela's elections where rigged. And you have failed to provide any piece of credible news to support otherwise.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

EVieira wrote:

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

I'm sure those elections weren't rigged...

Fancy_Pollux wrote:

It is common knowledge that Chavez rigged his last election, so it would be safe to assume that this one was rigged as well.
You were making some blatant unfounded speculations yourself, probably based on those links you posted earlier. You just did a "Venezuela election rigged" search on google and posted the first things you found, obviously because in your head you had already decided Chavez rigged the elections. That's much more one-sided than Poe, Ironchef or any other.

We have NO REASON to think, or even speculate, that Venezuela's elections where rigged. And you have failed to provide any piece of credible news to support otherwise.
@Pollux
I would also like to add given the personal nature of some of Pollux' comments (guilty of same I suppose) that many people with whom I have debated and with whom I hold opposing viewpoints have found me reasonable when confronted with rational argument and I concede argument points regularly. Even Lowing and I had a lengthy debate that ended rather amicably - and me and Lowing are poles apart in terms of opinion. You just seem to have a vendetta on my opinions, without providing rational argument against which I can make counterpoints or allowing us room to develop any kind of common ground - by assuming too much about who I really am. You're speaking 'from the gut'.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 04:26:41)

<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6960|New York

CameronPoe wrote:

bullit wrote:

Half my family live there and they hate him like most of the country, he only gives money to his supporters and theres still corruption there despite him being in power for 8 years. Now hes in power again for god knows how long as in 2010 hes holding a referendum on the constitiution and we all know hes gonna get support for that.
Most of the country? LOL. Less than 40% represents a minority, in case you haven't heard.

Get over yourself - you're obviously from the do-nothing landed classes of Venezuelan society, getting rich off the misery of others. I've been to Latin America several times and it's patently obvious how the system works over there - perpetuation of the gap between rich and poor.
Why do you belittle him when he obviousely has ties to this corrupt country? He tells you first hand information and gives an opinion(seeing HE actually has reason to worry) and you feel the need to tell him to get over himself? WTF Cam? Its painfully obviouse who needs to get over themselves here.

As for hugo, I personally hope the world see him as he is, a nutcase with riches comeing out of every orafice of his body, yet his country is still considered a third world country. One that is like most Oil rich countries where the Govt and the *Cough* Elected leader *Cough* get richer while the people get poorer and are dying and starveing.
CameronPoe
Member
+2,925|6814

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

bullit wrote:

Half my family live there and they hate him like most of the country, he only gives money to his supporters and theres still corruption there despite him being in power for 8 years. Now hes in power again for god knows how long as in 2010 hes holding a referendum on the constitiution and we all know hes gonna get support for that.
Most of the country? LOL. Less than 40% represents a minority, in case you haven't heard.

Get over yourself - you're obviously from the do-nothing landed classes of Venezuelan society, getting rich off the misery of others. I've been to Latin America several times and it's patently obvious how the system works over there - perpetuation of the gap between rich and poor.
Why do you belittle him when he obviousely has ties to this corrupt country? He tells you first hand information and gives an opinion(seeing HE actually has reason to worry) and you feel the need to tell him to get over himself? WTF Cam? Its painfully obviouse who needs to get over themselves here.

As for hugo, I personally hope the world see him as he is, a nutcase with riches comeing out of every orafice of his body, yet his country is still considered a third world country. One that is like most Oil rich countries where the Govt and the *Cough* Elected leader *Cough* get richer while the people get poorer and are dying and starveing.
Newsflash: Chavez didn't make the country the disaster it is. It's always been like that. Even if your comment about Chavez is/was true, the opposition to Chavez would be a gazillion times worse than him in terms of the riches/poverty thing. It's the corrupt right wing conservatives that unashamedly desire to perpetuate the gap between rich and poor!!

BTW> I agree my words were over the top and I apologise.

Last edited by CameronPoe (2006-12-05 04:33:40)

<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6960|New York

CameronPoe wrote:

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:


Most of the country? LOL. Less than 40% represents a minority, in case you haven't heard.

Get over yourself - you're obviously from the do-nothing landed classes of Venezuelan society, getting rich off the misery of others. I've been to Latin America several times and it's patently obvious how the system works over there - perpetuation of the gap between rich and poor.
Why do you belittle him when he obviousely has ties to this corrupt country? He tells you first hand information and gives an opinion(seeing HE actually has reason to worry) and you feel the need to tell him to get over himself? WTF Cam? Its painfully obviouse who needs to get over themselves here.

As for hugo, I personally hope the world see him as he is, a nutcase with riches comeing out of every orafice of his body, yet his country is still considered a third world country. One that is like most Oil rich countries where the Govt and the *Cough* Elected leader *Cough* get richer while the people get poorer and are dying and starveing.
Newsflash: Chavez didn't make the country the disaster it is. It's always been like that. Even if your comment about Chavez is/was true, the opposition to Chavez would be a gazillion times worse than him in terms of the riches/poverty thing. It's the corrupt right wing conservatives that unashamedly desire to perpetuate the gap between rich and poor!!

BTW> I agree my words were over the top and I apologise.
Thank you, and ill agree your right. But when you have the choices they were presented with, whats a country to do? They were and are in a no win situation.

I personally think, The US should cut all ties to them, and take the hit at the pump. But that remains to be seen if the american public can stand together on principle and do this or are greedy and want to save a few cents at the pump and let this guy do and say as he pleases. I for one would take the hit at the pump, and just stay home more if it got too bad. But it sure would send a message to Hugo.
Bubbalo
The Lizzard
+541|6820

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

Why do you belittle him when he obviousely has ties to this corrupt country?
That's right!  I've spent the last 2000 years watching Venezuala, and Chavez sucks!

Obviously I'm telling the truth, why would I try to lie over the interwebs?
EVieira
Member
+105|6737|Lutenblaag, Molvania

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

I personally think, The US should cut all ties to them, and take the hit at the pump. But that remains to be seen if the american public can stand together on principle and do this or are greedy and want to save a few cents at the pump and let this guy do and say as he pleases. I for one would take the hit at the pump, and just stay home more if it got too bad. But it sure would send a message to Hugo.
I would bet american society would rather save a few cents on the pump. Actually, I'm pretty damn sure the rather save a few cents in the gallon instead of shutting up Chavez, considering that a few cents can easily turn into millions considering the entire economy.

"America is addicted to oil", thats probably the only right thing Bush had ever had a speech writer write for him, and that phrase will assure US thinks twice about taking a tougher stand against Venezuela. And Chavez knows this too well.
"All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered;  the point is to discover them."
Galileo Galilei  (1564-1642)
<[onex]>Headstone
Member
+102|6960|New York

Bubbalo wrote:

<[onex]>Headstone wrote:

Why do you belittle him when he obviousely has ties to this corrupt country?
That's right!  I've spent the last 2000 years watching Venezuala, and Chavez sucks!

Obviously I'm telling the truth, why would I try to lie over the interwebs?
Man your warped LOL. I have some fantastic meds you could try LMAO.
bullit
Tank Troll
+71|6948|London, UK
The venezuelan people didnt vote chavez it was the poor people and as you know there are alot of them, the upper and middleclass people voted for rosales. Chavez is a communist and look at cuba when they got rid of capatalism In venezuela u got police officers doing shiz and are easily bribed instead of chavez going ZOMG BUSH=EL DIABLO look at his own damn country. Have people not read that Chavez has his own militia to get back power if he lost the elections incase him rigging the elections wasnt enough

People who support communist states should go live there and see what its like to own nothing and work for the state.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard