Russia is geographically higher up on the globe than Canada so they're used to it.*TS*tphai wrote:
like naplean and hitlar they tired to invade russia but the weather and elements made them lose.. so if the PAC invaded canada they would loseGR34 wrote:
we canaidians are still alive in 2142 we survived like we always have we now live in bigger igloos nothing spical but we still have 21st centuary equpiment E.G. C7 C9 C4 emplosives, and we have propeller plaes. but we are still alive we waight till the pac and eu kill one another then we kill who ever wins there fight!! and we get ther earth
No, No. You all have it wrong. They won't win because the Canadians are just too nice. You'll invade and they'll give you maple syrup. :p And who can hate those people with maple syrup. :drool:
Anyways, I still believe people need to show the land masses better, because the sea level would be lower.
Anyways, I still believe people need to show the land masses better, because the sea level would be lower.
Syrup makes everything better. I used to drink it right out of the bottle, like beerup.Stags wrote:
No, No. You all have it wrong. They won't win because the Canadians are just too nice. You'll invade and they'll give you maple syrup. :p And who can hate those people with maple syrup. :drool:
Anyways, I still believe people need to show the land masses better, because the sea level would be lower.
Well since the ocean is a giant mass of water in constant motion from the moons gravitational pull it would not be frozen and if it was frozen we would all be really really fucked because what does water do when frozen.....Expand and the expanding water would all engulf us in an entire ice world just look at PlutoStags wrote:
Got a question, shouldn't the oceans be frozen too? Also, if that happened the sea level would be lower thus there would be land where none was before.
Also, the situation in 2142 is a lot like the snowball earth affect that happened early in earth's history (although, after the moon's formation).
so there you go numb nuts
This is not official....
A battle in Florida would rule.
You know, Florida isn't the only unfrozen state in th US. You could also fight for Georgia...eh well at least the southern half
"No, it's my peach tree!"....
"No, it's my peach tree!"....
Last edited by -Gunsmoke- (2006-12-02 19:59:12)
The world is covered in ice. I think there's enough water.D34TH_D34L3R wrote:
Wouldn't the bigger problem that food be the drinkable water supply?
Just a question?
LMAO... you don't have a single clue do you?DrMod wrote:
how is Hawii frozen
Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ice_ageAn ice age is a period of long-term downturn in the temperature of Earth's climate...
In layman's terms, the whole world is cold.
Last edited by Dex Luther (2006-12-02 20:53:20)
vietnam, cambodia and burma looks thawed
austrailia is gone...poor kangaroos...
Well, yeah, no joke. We have giant floating machines that transport people, have fusion reactors and launch glowing orbs of death, but we can't grow food hydroponically and keep everyone warm with the fusion power?Ender2309 wrote:
this whole war is baseless, as
A) canada hasn't changed at all
B) they'd just use hydroponics and shit to grow food.
Plus, one of them smart Titan builders aught to have thought of the idea of putting an arseload of missiles and missle launchers on the titan itself! I mean, sure, it would ruin the premise of the game, but everyone could stay nice and cozy inside of the titan while the enemy frantically captures missile silos only to get wasted anyway.
Map = geographical failure. That would not happen. Period.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Australia would not freeze dammit.
and if we didnt freeze - there should have been an Australian theatre. i mean damn. we have tonnes of natural resources, and in the world economic market we are known as the world's farm.
judging from our farming and mining resources, it would seem we would be of HIGH strategic importance in the scnario presented in BF2142.
expansion pack ftw.
and if we didnt freeze - there should have been an Australian theatre. i mean damn. we have tonnes of natural resources, and in the world economic market we are known as the world's farm.
judging from our farming and mining resources, it would seem we would be of HIGH strategic importance in the scnario presented in BF2142.
expansion pack ftw.
Hmm... the earth rotates so there for there would be a band around the equator that may not be frozen but still cold. BTW salt water doesnt freeze unless the water is seperated from the salt and since it's cold thus no evaporation no seperation of water from salt equals no lower ocean level.
Just my opinion.
Just my opinion.
Penguins are freezing, support Global Warming.
Actually, salt water DOES freeze, but at a lower temperature than fresh water. The exact temperature at which salt water will freeze depends on how much salt there is. The saltier the water, the lower the temperature needed to freeze it.xm20k wrote:
Hmm... the earth rotates so there for there would be a band around the equator that may not be frozen but still cold. BTW salt water doesnt freeze unless the water is seperated from the salt and since it's cold thus no evaporation no seperation of water from salt equals no lower ocean level.
Just my opinion.
Example: Water with as much salt as can be dissolved (you can't dissolve any more no matter how hard you try) into it will freeze at a temperature of -22ºC(-7.6ºF).
[/science lesson]
EDIT: for typo
Last edited by Dex Luther (2006-12-03 00:14:10)
WTF Australia frozen over LMAO its so hot here its not funny, australia is the dryest country in the world so how would it freeze with no water?
EA/DICE chose which part of the world was frozen, so of course it wont be accurate. what were all you people expecting?Machine_Madness wrote:
WTF Australia frozen over LMAO its so hot here its not funny, australia is the dryest country in the world so how would it freeze with no water?
Mabey true of small bodies of water or with little to no movement but the ocean currents keep it from freezing. The surface could freeze over but the water below would remain unfrozen. It is a lot colder at the ocean floor at the polar caps than -7.6 degrees F. IIRC.Dex Luther wrote:
Actually, salt water DOES freeze, but at a lower temperature than fresh water. The exact temperature at which salt water will freeze depends on how much salt there is. The saltier the water, the lower the temperature needed to freeze it.xm20k wrote:
Hmm... the earth rotates so there for there would be a band around the equator that may not be frozen but still cold. BTW salt water doesnt freeze unless the water is seperated from the salt and since it's cold thus no evaporation no seperation of water from salt equals no lower ocean level.
Just my opinion.
Example: Water with as much salt as can be dissolved (you can't dissolve any more no matter how hard you try) into it will freeze at a temperature of -22ºC(-7.6ºF).
[/science lesson]
EDIT: for typo
got pawned by a lot of ice lol,_j5689_ wrote:
By ice, lol.Masterstyle wrote:
Damn the USA got pwnedI have no idea, it'd be pretty cool to fight in Disney World though, lmao.WilhelmSissener wrote:
Now, how official is it?
I'm sure during an ice age the temperatures drop WAY below -22ºC. Heck, during NORMAL Canadian winters the temperature often drops to double that (-40ºC).xm20k wrote:
Mabey true of small bodies of water or with little to no movement but the ocean currents keep it from freezing. The surface could freeze over but the water below would remain unfrozen. It is a lot colder at the ocean floor at the polar caps than -7.6 degrees F. IIRC.Dex Luther wrote:
Actually, salt water DOES freeze, but at a lower temperature than fresh water. The exact temperature at which salt water will freeze depends on how much salt there is. The saltier the water, the lower the temperature needed to freeze it.xm20k wrote:
Hmm... the earth rotates so there for there would be a band around the equator that may not be frozen but still cold. BTW salt water doesnt freeze unless the water is seperated from the salt and since it's cold thus no evaporation no seperation of water from salt equals no lower ocean level.
Just my opinion.
Example: Water with as much salt as can be dissolved (you can't dissolve any more no matter how hard you try) into it will freeze at a temperature of -22ºC(-7.6ºF).
[/science lesson]
EDIT: for typo
I'd estimate that if the planet was going through an ice age the temperatures would be closer to -100ºC if not lower. Otherwise, as other have said, people would just buy some snow tires, a snow blower, and get on with life.
For an event like this to cause a war, it has to be more devastating than anything we could adapt easily too. For some cold weather and ice to be that devastating I think we're looking at temperatures that would make all those people who use the "It'll be a cold day in Hell before..." expression sweat.
I profess, it's possible that not all the water in the oceans would freeze, but I think we're still talking about ice hundreds of kilometers thick.
I don't think Oceans are even hundreds of kilometers deep.Dex Luther wrote:
I'm sure during an ice age the temperatures drop WAY below -22ºC. Heck, during NORMAL Canadian winters the temperature often drops to double that (-40ºC).xm20k wrote:
Mabey true of small bodies of water or with little to no movement but the ocean currents keep it from freezing. The surface could freeze over but the water below would remain unfrozen. It is a lot colder at the ocean floor at the polar caps than -7.6 degrees F. IIRC.Dex Luther wrote:
Actually, salt water DOES freeze, but at a lower temperature than fresh water. The exact temperature at which salt water will freeze depends on how much salt there is. The saltier the water, the lower the temperature needed to freeze it.
Example: Water with as much salt as can be dissolved (you can't dissolve any more no matter how hard you try) into it will freeze at a temperature of -22ºC(-7.6ºF).
[/science lesson]
EDIT: for typo
I'd estimate that if the planet was going through an ice age the temperatures would be closer to -100ºC if not lower. Otherwise, as other have said, people would just buy some snow tires, a snow blower, and get on with life.
For an event like this to cause a war, it has to be more devastating than anything we could adapt easily too. For some cold weather and ice to be that devastating I think we're looking at temperatures that would make all those people who use the "It'll be a cold day in Hell before..." expression sweat.
I profess, it's possible that not all the water in the oceans would freeze, but I think we're still talking about ice hundreds of kilometers thick.
Wtf Mate?
Well During an Iceage the temperatures are not so much colder then they are now. The difference between winter and summer becomes closer. We are running up to an Iceage again. The Icemasses on the northpole are melting, swifting the path of hot currents of water. The watertemeperature by Europe will change causing a change in the climate. A new Iceage is born.Dex Luther wrote:
I'm sure during an ice age the temperatures drop WAY below -22ºC. Heck, during NORMAL Canadian winters the temperature often drops to double that (-40ºC).xm20k wrote:
Mabey true of small bodies of water or with little to no movement but the ocean currents keep it from freezing. The surface could freeze over but the water below would remain unfrozen. It is a lot colder at the ocean floor at the polar caps than -7.6 degrees F. IIRC.Dex Luther wrote:
Actually, salt water DOES freeze, but at a lower temperature than fresh water. The exact temperature at which salt water will freeze depends on how much salt there is. The saltier the water, the lower the temperature needed to freeze it.
Example: Water with as much salt as can be dissolved (you can't dissolve any more no matter how hard you try) into it will freeze at a temperature of -22ºC(-7.6ºF).
[/science lesson]
EDIT: for typo
I'd estimate that if the planet was going through an ice age the temperatures would be closer to -100ºC if not lower. Otherwise, as other have said, people would just buy some snow tires, a snow blower, and get on with life.
For an event like this to cause a war, it has to be more devastating than anything we could adapt easily too. For some cold weather and ice to be that devastating I think we're looking at temperatures that would make all those people who use the "It'll be a cold day in Hell before..." expression sweat.
I profess, it's possible that not all the water in the oceans would freeze, but I think we're still talking about ice hundreds of kilometers thick.
Mankind has survivad Iceages
Last edited by Doperwt. (2006-12-03 15:00:14)