Which one? Why?
Poll
Which One out of this list is the Biggest Threat to World Peace?
| Iran | 10% | 10% - 15 | ||||
| Muslim Extremists from all Around the World | 34% | 34% - 51 | ||||
| Israel | 7% | 7% - 11 | ||||
| Al-Qaeda | 4% | 4% - 6 | ||||
| Hezbollah | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| Hamas | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| Civil war in Iraq | 0% | 0% - 0 | ||||
| North Korea | 2% | 2% - 3 | ||||
| All of the above | 20% | 20% - 30 | ||||
| Other | 21% | 21% - 32 | ||||
| Total: 148 | ||||||
Other. People who blame america for the world's woes.
Iran, we attack them, all the middle east will join in..then the rest!
Well, I am going to have to say Iran. Not because of the people that live there or the fact that they are a Muslim country but because their leadership. When you attempt to kidnap Australian sailors (which failed because the Aussies dont take shit from no one) and then actually do kidnap British sailors lots of people become suspicious. Also, [ghetto drawl] they be instigating shit [/ghetto drawl]
None of those. Muslim extremism hasn't got to the point where my life is unbearable, all of that relates to the ME which at the end of the day i couldn't give 3 fucks about.
Can't see any of those starting something that would seriously affect my life or the world. Unless NK let the nukes fly, even then none would reach Britain, and they'd get slammed by everyone else.
Long story short, none of the above.
Can't see any of those starting something that would seriously affect my life or the world. Unless NK let the nukes fly, even then none would reach Britain, and they'd get slammed by everyone else.
Long story short, none of the above.
Where can I click USA?
ME. Some wacko drops a nuke in Israel. WWIII. How come that doesn't affect you?Mekstizzle wrote:
None of those. Muslim extremism hasn't got to the point where my life is unbearable, all of that relates to the ME which at the end of the day i couldn't give 3 fucks about.
Can't see any of those starting something that would seriously affect my life or the world. Unless NK let the nukes fly, even then none would reach Britain, and they'd get slammed by everyone else.
Long story short, none of the above.
I pciked all of the above.
Cubefreak666 wrote:
Where can I click USA?
Eh, none of them seem to be helping it, for that matter.
See "Other"INFERNO552 wrote:
xgloryx wrote:
Cubefreak666 wrote:
Where can I click USA?
Last edited by DesertFox- (2007-07-02 15:56:13)
maybe... usa, i have nothing against usa but its "world police" behaviour may cause some big trouble.
Other than that, north korea and iran. Mostly because of their shitty leaders.
Other than that, north korea and iran. Mostly because of their shitty leaders.
all of the above ---------------- each plays a little part which snowball into a big avalache
Please explain exactly how those people are the biggest threat to world peace? Specifically explain how they're worse than the people commiting violent acts.David.Podedworny wrote:
Other. People who blame america for the world's woes.
All of the above. They all affect our world in a negative way.
i hate that. how can the "biggest" be more than one?SEREMAKER wrote:
all of the above ---------------- each plays a little part which snowball into a big avalache
Maybe the biggest threat is a combination of factors.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
i hate that. how can the "biggest" be more than one?SEREMAKER wrote:
all of the above ---------------- each plays a little part which snowball into a big avalache
how is that possible? the biggest threat, of all the threats listed, is contributing to total threat, but if we were to say a combination makes up the biggest, we would be saying no more than 100% threat level is a combination of all factors.sergeriver wrote:
Maybe the biggest threat is a combination of factors.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
i hate that. how can the "biggest" be more than one?SEREMAKER wrote:
all of the above ---------------- each plays a little part which snowball into a big avalache
edit: this becomes common knowledge, so we must break down the 'biggest' to the next biggest threat level under 100% (99.999 at the most).
Last edited by CoronadoSEAL (2007-07-02 12:28:24)
I'm saying that people voting for all of the above could be considering those threats equally dangerous, therefore none of them is a bigger threat than the others.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
how is that possible? the biggest threat, of all the threats listed, is contributing to total threat, but if we were to say a combination makes up the biggest, we would be saying no more than 100% threat level is a combination of all factors.sergeriver wrote:
Maybe the biggest threat is a combination of factors.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
i hate that. how can the "biggest" be more than one?
meh. i see your point. /different interpretationsergeriver wrote:
I'm saying that people voting for all of the above could be considering those threats equally dangerous, therefore none of them is a bigger threat than the others.CoronadoSEAL wrote:
how is that possible? the biggest threat, of all the threats listed, is contributing to total threat, but if we were to say a combination makes up the biggest, we would be saying no more than 100% threat level is a combination of all factors.sergeriver wrote:
Maybe the biggest threat is a combination of factors.
The biggest threat to world peace is arguing about voting in polls, arguing about grammar, or nit-picking inconsequential things.
I'm pretty sure those you mention are bigger threats than the ones listed above.Pug wrote:
The biggest threat to world peace is arguing about voting in polls, arguing about grammar, or nit-picking inconsequential things.
Last edited by sergeriver (2007-07-02 12:37:30)
Other:
Human Nature
Human Nature
all of them, you cant trust any of them
tbh America should be up there lol