Poll

BF2s SotW #10

126%26% - 27
22%2% - 3
37%7% - 8
48%8% - 9
51%1% - 2
632%32% - 33
715%15% - 16
82%2% - 3
Total: 101
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6948

konfusion wrote:

I don't like the writing in no6 - it just doesn't "do it for me" - it's too blotchy, too bold, stands out too much.

-konfusion
But isn't that the goal of a logo/brand? To stand out from the rest?

You should know as a 'designer'.

Ps. Konfusion. Your projects part of your website is one big '404' fix the links/wwwroot.
-Whiteroom-
Pineapplewhat
+572|6870|BC, Canada
1,6,and 7 are the best, but I'm gonna go with 6 as I think it fits most with the simplistic theme they usually go for with the symbols.
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6948

Very close race.
Microwave
_
+515|6866|Loughborough Uni / Leeds, UK
1:  It's on fire....not a sensible idea

2: Nice but looks abit....paint.

3. Very nice but I think the colours are slightly off - too luminous.

4. Just because it has a transparent background (as Sarge said) does not make it good! This forum is hard the context of an olympic logo, lolz. + disney font.....

5. Well put together and a nice idea but just doesn't do it for me.

6. Love this one (got my vote) - simple, eye catching, slick and looks professional.

7. Nice idea with the flag but I don't think it came off too well (I'm sure with abit of tweaking it can look better).

8. I like this one but again not really my thing... I don't think it works with big ben between the rings, possibly to the side? ( - just personal preference).





All constructive criticisms. Great work guys!

Last edited by james@alienware (2007-06-17 02:50:35)

Fosterthelegend
:)
+97|6826|Kent, UK
me likes 3
or 6
Toilet Sex
one love, one pig
+1,775|6783

#1 gets my vote since this is based on looks I guess.

But isn't that the goal of a logo/brand? To stand out from the rest?

You should know as a 'designer'.
Not necessarily. The goal of a logo is to communicate to your audience, and sometimes "standing out" isn't the best way to go about it. Also, type which is too bold or whatever wouldn't work because logos should work at small sizes as well as large, and if bold type is too bold, it screws up at small. Then there's loads more issues like printing.

Last edited by Toilet Sex (2007-06-17 08:23:21)

CruZ4dR
Cereal Killer
+145|6867|The View From The Afternoon
lol #5 ftw!
konfusion
mostly afk
+480|6761|CH/BR - in UK

Bernadictus wrote:

konfusion wrote:

I don't like the writing in no6 - it just doesn't "do it for me" - it's too blotchy, too bold, stands out too much.

-konfusion
But isn't that the goal of a logo/brand? To stand out from the rest?

You should know as a 'designer'.

Ps. Konfusion. Your projects part of your website is one big '404' fix the links/wwwroot.
lol - what I meant is that the font simply looks ugly, because it's blotchy. In any color but black, the filled in os might have worked out better - but in black, as I said, it's just too blotchy.

And about my website - I think my hosting provider's been fucking around with my stuff...

-konfusion
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6948

Toilet Sex wrote:

#1 gets my vote since this is based on looks I guess.

But isn't that the goal of a logo/brand? To stand out from the rest?

You should know as a 'designer'.
Not necessarily. The goal of a logo is to communicate to your audience, and sometimes "standing out" isn't the best way to go about it. Also, type which is too bold or whatever wouldn't work because logos should work at small sizes as well as large, and if bold type is too bold, it screws up at small. Then there's loads more issues like printing.
It depends on the company that hired you. Soon I will show what I mean.
Entertayner
Member
+826|6782

The winner is Bernadictus he receives the coveted:

https://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t290/Entertayner/Other%20Stuff/sotw_winner_1.png

Even though he's a n00b and closed this thread.
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6948

Sowwy, I did nots do it on purpose.
^*AlphA*^
F*ckers
+3,135|6949|The Hague, Netherlands

Nice one Bern
https://bf3s.com/sigs/36eac2cb6af70a43508fd8d1c93d3201f4e23435.png
Toilet Sex
one love, one pig
+1,775|6783

Bernadictus wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:

#1 gets my vote since this is based on looks I guess.

But isn't that the goal of a logo/brand? To stand out from the rest?

You should know as a 'designer'.
Not necessarily. The goal of a logo is to communicate to your audience, and sometimes "standing out" isn't the best way to go about it. Also, type which is too bold or whatever wouldn't work because logos should work at small sizes as well as large, and if bold type is too bold, it screws up at small. Then there's loads more issues like printing.
It depends on the company that hired you. Soon I will show what I mean.
Messed up type depends on the company? o_O
DonFck
Hibernator
+3,227|6843|Finland

Toilet Sex wrote:

Bernadictus wrote:

Toilet Sex wrote:

#1 gets my vote since this is based on looks I guess.


Not necessarily. The goal of a logo is to communicate to your audience, and sometimes "standing out" isn't the best way to go about it. Also, type which is too bold or whatever wouldn't work because logos should work at small sizes as well as large, and if bold type is too bold, it screws up at small. Then there's loads more issues like printing.
It depends on the company that hired you. Soon I will show what I mean.
Messed up type depends on the company? o_O
I personally like the font and the logo.

For one, it was an actual logo, and a very good one at that. The font was "punk", as in 1970's punk (Sex Pistols / Clash - London Calling <-- get it? ), so it worked also. In other words, it represented three things, IMO. The old/traditional (Olympic Games), the sports aspect (look at the logo for a while, it's a running person) and something that personifies the location (the text - London-punk font)

I liked, and I like still.

Disclaimer: The above analysis is just mine, and isn't necessarily true, or what Bernie was after. He will surely comment on my analysis if I missed the mark on anything
I need around tree fiddy.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6876|NT, like Mick Dundee

6
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Bernadictus
Moderator
+1,055|6948

Toilet Sex wrote:

Messed up type depends on the company? o_O
You call it messed up typography, which is fine by me. It is your personal opinion. On the other hand, your opinion has no meaning to me, since I presume you don't make a living of designing, which I on the other hand do.

And second, I find it pretty offensive when people comment like that on a persons work, when they can't lay anything on the table themselves.

DonFck wrote:

For one, it was an actual logo, and a very good one at that. The font was "punk", as in 1970's punk (Sex Pistols / Clash - London Calling <-- get it? ), so it worked also. In other words, it represented three things, IMO. The old/traditional (Olympic Games), the sports aspect (look at the logo for a while, it's a running person) and something that personifies the location (the text - London-punk font).
I would like for you to get out of my head Don. You are scaring me.

*Searches office for spy tools*
Jenspm
penis
+1,716|6943|St. Andrews / Oslo

Oh so close!

But Bernies sig was by far the best one...

GJ

(mine was #1 btw, yay me)
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/flickricon.png https://twitter.com/phoenix/favicon.ico
RedTwizzler
I do it for the lulz.
+124|6748|Chicago
I like #1.
KuSTaV
noice
+947|6723|Gold Coast
They're all very good, but 1, 2 and 6 stood out for their simplicity. No. 7 is creative, but I dont see it posted everywhere.
noice                                                                                                        https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/26774/awsmsanta.png
.Sup
be nice
+2,646|6665|The Twilight Zone
no. 6 is a good idea, i would just change the font. i voted for that one
https://www.shrani.si/f/3H/7h/45GTw71U/untitled-1.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard