Best choice to head up the UN / IAEA Security Council.

2007-04-12 09:09:07

#1

(T)eflon(S)hadow: R.I.P. Neda; +456|7258|Grapevine, TX

The UN has done a marvelous job again of showing it's best intentions. Today they announced none other than Iran & Syria, as the head of EDIT: UN Disarmament Commision Both are on the UN list of Sates the Support Terrorism. Iran just had Sanctions put on it. Seriously when will the people of our countries stand up and put an end to this irresponsible club of elitist?

I watched the ogiginal report on TV this morning, however I have found nothing regarding this online. I have scoured Google, CNN, Reuters, etc.

Discuss and please add links to story when you find one. Thanks

Last edited by (T)eflon(S)hadow (2007-04-13 16:59:06)

2007-04-12 09:13:26

#2

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|7100|UK

Cheney....i'll bet he'd find nukes in the vatican.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2007-04-12 09:33:24

#3

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7145

m3thod wrote:
Cheney....i'll bet he'd find nukes in the vatican.

The pope is the nuke.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

2007-04-12 09:37:34

#4

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6958|Global Command

This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.

2007-04-12 12:58:35

#5

Pug: UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate; +652|6971|Texas - Bigger than France

Isn't this kind of like parents putting their teenage son in charge of the house while they go on summer vacation?

2007-04-12 22:41:57

#6

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6834|North Carolina

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:
m3thod wrote:
Cheney....i'll bet he'd find nukes in the vatican.
The pope is the nuke.

Would that make him a puke?

2007-04-12 22:43:30

#7

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6834|North Carolina

ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.

Agreed. NATO should be the organization that we focus on. Those countries are our real allies. We'd just need to add Australia, Brazil, and Japan in there.

2007-04-13 00:29:39

#8

TrollmeaT: Aspiring Objectivist; +492|7102|Colorado

ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.

QFE

2007-04-13 01:08:31

#9

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|7145

Turquoise wrote:
ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.
Agreed. NATO should be the organization that we focus on. Those countries are our real allies. We'd just need to add Australia, Brazil, and Japan in there.

North Atlantic Trade Organization. None of those are in the North Atlantic. But there should be a League of Nation 2.

2007-04-13 01:11:16

#10

konfusion: mostly afk; +480|6979|CH/BR - in UK

Turquoise wrote:
ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.
Agreed. NATO should be the organization that we focus on. Those countries are our real allies. We'd just need to add Australia, Brazil, and Japan in there.

I dunno - for some reason, I get the feeling that the US doesn't like Brazil very much...

-konfusion

2007-04-13 01:16:42

#11

Varegg: Support fanatic :-); +2,206|7239|Nårvei

ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.

Yes, lets tear down bridges and cooperation worldwide to create the perfect balance !

Lets continue to treat these nations like they are second rate and watch them dwell deeper into poverty and extremism and hate the industrial countries even more than they do now !

Is this what you want ATG ? ..... the few western countries against the rest of the world ?

If so you need a higher wall than the one Israel got to keep the "terrorists" out of leveling your country !

Keep ignoring that opinions like the one you have on this issue is why we have war and conflicts in the world, this is just how a Islamistic fanatic would think !

Wait behind the line ..............................................................

2007-04-13 01:55:08

#12

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6984

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:
The UN has done a marvelous job again of showing it's best intentions. Today they announced none other than Iran & Syria, as the head of Nuclear Decommissioning for the UN Security Council/ IAEA. Both are on the UN list of Sates the Support Terrorism. Iran just had Sanctions put on it. Seriously when will the people of our countries stand up and put an end to this irresponsible club of elitist?

I watched the rgiginal report on TV this morning, however I have found nothing regarding this online. I have scoured Google, CNN, Reuters, etc.

Discuss and please add links to story when you find one. Thanks

On what channel or website did you see this? I find this rather hard to believe.

2007-04-13 17:13:09

#13

(T)eflon(S)hadow: R.I.P. Neda; +456|7258|Grapevine, TX

Ok I posted in accurate info. The U.N. made Iran & Syria the head of the Disarmament Council. I thought it had to do with Nuclear Decommissioning, I was incorrect.

2007-04-13 17:23:01

#14

GunSlinger OIF II: Banned.; +1,860|7073

reelected?

2007-04-13 17:40:19

#15

Skorpy-chan: Member; +127|6774|Twyford, UK

ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.

You DO know that the purpose of the UN is to wrap defense in so much bureaucracy that World War 3 will never happen, right?
Terminating it would lead to multiple unrestrained nukings and wars.

2007-04-13 17:48:07

#16

ATG: Banned; +5,233|6958|Global Command

Skorpy-chan wrote:
ATG wrote:
This is an example of why the U.N. isn't just a collection of clowns; it's part of the problem in the world and needs to be terminated.
You DO know that the purpose of the UN is to wrap defense in so much bureaucracy that World War 3 will never happen, right?
Terminating it would lead to multiple unrestrained nukings and wars.

hmmmnn... possible point here.

2007-04-13 17:52:12

#17

TrollmeaT: Aspiring Objectivist; +492|7102|Colorado

I don't agree, the whole oil for food scandal should have been enough to close the doors.

BF2S Forums Best choice to head up the UN / IAEA Security Council.

m3thod wrote:

cyborg_ninja-117 wrote:

m3thod wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

ATG wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

ATG wrote:

ATG wrote:

(T)eflon(S)hadow wrote:

ATG wrote:

Skorpy-chan wrote:

ATG wrote:

Board footer